Bispectral Index (BIS) Versus Electronic Alerts in the Prevention of Anesthesia Awareness: the Michigan Awareness Control Study
MACS
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Bispectral Index Monitoring to Electronic Alerts for Prevention of Awareness During Anesthesia in the General Population
1 other identifier
interventional
22,185
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Awareness during anesthesia is a problem receiving increased attention by patients, clinicians, and the general public. The incidence of intraoperative awareness has been reported to be between 1-2/1000 cases, but recent data suggest that this may be an overestimate. The Bispectral Index (BIS) Monitor is an electroencephalographic method of assessing depth of anesthesia that has been shown in one study to reduce the incidence of awareness during anesthesia in the high-risk population (Myles et al, 2004). In the study of Myles et al, the number needed to treat (NNT) in order to prevent one case of awareness in the high-risk population was 138, with an associated cost of approximately US$2200. Since the NNT and the associated cost of treatment would be much higher in the general population, the efficacy of the BIS monitor in preventing awareness in all anesthetized patients needs to be clearly established. Furthermore, recent data suggest that the BIS may not be useful in the high-risk population. The investigators propose a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing the BIS monitor to electronic alerts based on non-electroencephalographic gauges of anesthetic depth.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2008
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 29, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 17, 2014
CompletedDecember 7, 2017
November 1, 2017
1.9 years
May 29, 2008
December 12, 2013
November 3, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Percentage of Incidences With Explicit Recall in the BIS Versus MAC Alert Groups.
By modified intention-to-treat analysis
Outcome of awareness is assessed 30-days after the operation
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Number of Participants With Dreams During Anesthesia Compared Between MAC or BIS Monitoring
During surgery (45 minutes - 18 hours), measured based on 30 day interviews
Percentage of Cases With Electronic Alerts
During surgery: (45 minutes - 18 hours)
Overall Use of Anesthetics Comparing the BIS to MAC Alerts.
During surgery (45 minutes - 18 hours)
Time Till Discharge Readiness
During recovery room stay: 30 minutes to 6 hours
Number of Participants Without Nausea or Vomiting
During recovery room stay: 30 minutes to 6 hours
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (6)
Relationship Between BIS Values and Hemodynamic Parameters.
Outcome of hemodynamic stability is assessed
The Relationship Between Cumulative Deep Hypnotic Time, Anesthetic Doses, and Mortality.
Outcome of mortality is assessed
Predictors of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Based on the Type of Awareness Event.
Outcome of post-traumatic stress disorder is assessed with the covariate of awareness
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
BIS group
EXPERIMENTALThis group will have BIS values visible and will receive alerts when the value is \>60.
MAC Alert
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will receive an alert if total MAC (including intravenous infusions) is \<0.5 age-adjusted.
Interventions
Comparison of two different alerting protocols. One using the bispectral index monitor and one using the MAC alerting protocols.
Comparison of two different alerting protocols. One using the bispectral index monitor and one using the MAC alerting protocols.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 18 years of age, English-speaking, available for follow-up interview at one month.
You may not qualify if:
- Pre-existing neurologic or neuropsychiatric condition, surgical manipulation around forehead, not available for follow-up interview.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Michiganlead
- Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Researchcollaborator
- American Society of Anesthesiologistscollaborator
- Washington University School of Medicinecollaborator
- University of Chicagocollaborator
- University of Manitobacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Michigan Medical School, University Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Related Publications (4)
Vance JL, Shanks AM, Woodrum DT. Intraoperative bispectral index monitoring and time to extubation after cardiac surgery: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Sep 18;14:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-79. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25249789DERIVEDShanks AM, Avidan MS, Kheterpal S, Tremper KK, Vandervest JC, Cavanaugh JM, Mashour GA. Alerting thresholds for the prevention of intraoperative awareness with explicit recall: a secondary analysis of the Michigan Awareness Control Study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 May;32(5):346-53. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000123.
PMID: 25010744DERIVEDAvidan MS, Palanca BJ, Glick D, Jacobsohn E, Villafranca A, O'Connor M, Mashour GA; BAG-RECALL Study Group. Protocol for the BAG-RECALL clinical trial: a prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled trial to determine whether a bispectral index-guided protocol is superior to an anesthesia gas-guided protocol in reducing intraoperative awareness with explicit recall in high risk surgical patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2009 Nov 30;9:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-9-8.
PMID: 19948045DERIVEDMashour GA, Tremper KK, Avidan MS. Protocol for the "Michigan Awareness Control Study": A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing electronic alerts based on bispectral index monitoring or minimum alveolar concentration for the prevention of intraoperative awareness. BMC Anesthesiol. 2009 Nov 5;9:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-9-7.
PMID: 19891771DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. George A Mashour
- Organization
- University of Michigan
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
George A. Mashour, M.D., Ph.D.
University of Michigan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology and Neurosurgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 29, 2008
First Posted
June 3, 2008
Study Start
May 1, 2008
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Study Completion
June 1, 2010
Last Updated
December 7, 2017
Results First Posted
November 17, 2014
Record last verified: 2017-11