NCT00689091

Brief Summary

Awareness during anesthesia is a problem receiving increased attention by patients, clinicians, and the general public. The incidence of intraoperative awareness has been reported to be between 1-2/1000 cases, but recent data suggest that this may be an overestimate. The Bispectral Index (BIS) Monitor is an electroencephalographic method of assessing depth of anesthesia that has been shown in one study to reduce the incidence of awareness during anesthesia in the high-risk population (Myles et al, 2004). In the study of Myles et al, the number needed to treat (NNT) in order to prevent one case of awareness in the high-risk population was 138, with an associated cost of approximately US$2200. Since the NNT and the associated cost of treatment would be much higher in the general population, the efficacy of the BIS monitor in preventing awareness in all anesthetized patients needs to be clearly established. Furthermore, recent data suggest that the BIS may not be useful in the high-risk population. The investigators propose a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing the BIS monitor to electronic alerts based on non-electroencephalographic gauges of anesthetic depth.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
22,185

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2008

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2008

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 29, 2008

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 3, 2008

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2010

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 17, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

December 7, 2017

Status Verified

November 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

May 29, 2008

Results QC Date

December 12, 2013

Last Update Submit

November 3, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

AwarenessBIS Monitorelectronic alertsminimumalveolarconcentration

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The Percentage of Incidences With Explicit Recall in the BIS Versus MAC Alert Groups.

    By modified intention-to-treat analysis

    Outcome of awareness is assessed 30-days after the operation

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Number of Participants With Dreams During Anesthesia Compared Between MAC or BIS Monitoring

    During surgery (45 minutes - 18 hours), measured based on 30 day interviews

  • Percentage of Cases With Electronic Alerts

    During surgery: (45 minutes - 18 hours)

  • Overall Use of Anesthetics Comparing the BIS to MAC Alerts.

    During surgery (45 minutes - 18 hours)

  • Time Till Discharge Readiness

    During recovery room stay: 30 minutes to 6 hours

  • Number of Participants Without Nausea or Vomiting

    During recovery room stay: 30 minutes to 6 hours

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Relationship Between BIS Values and Hemodynamic Parameters.

    Outcome of hemodynamic stability is assessed

  • The Relationship Between Cumulative Deep Hypnotic Time, Anesthetic Doses, and Mortality.

    Outcome of mortality is assessed

  • Predictors of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Based on the Type of Awareness Event.

    Outcome of post-traumatic stress disorder is assessed with the covariate of awareness

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

BIS group

EXPERIMENTAL

This group will have BIS values visible and will receive alerts when the value is \>60.

Device: Bispectral Index Monitor

MAC Alert

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group will receive an alert if total MAC (including intravenous infusions) is \<0.5 age-adjusted.

Device: Electronic MAC alert

Interventions

Comparison of two different alerting protocols. One using the bispectral index monitor and one using the MAC alerting protocols.

BIS group

Comparison of two different alerting protocols. One using the bispectral index monitor and one using the MAC alerting protocols.

MAC Alert

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • At least 18 years of age, English-speaking, available for follow-up interview at one month.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pre-existing neurologic or neuropsychiatric condition, surgical manipulation around forehead, not available for follow-up interview.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Michigan Medical School, University Hospital

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Vance JL, Shanks AM, Woodrum DT. Intraoperative bispectral index monitoring and time to extubation after cardiac surgery: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Sep 18;14:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-79. eCollection 2014.

  • Shanks AM, Avidan MS, Kheterpal S, Tremper KK, Vandervest JC, Cavanaugh JM, Mashour GA. Alerting thresholds for the prevention of intraoperative awareness with explicit recall: a secondary analysis of the Michigan Awareness Control Study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 May;32(5):346-53. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000123.

  • Avidan MS, Palanca BJ, Glick D, Jacobsohn E, Villafranca A, O'Connor M, Mashour GA; BAG-RECALL Study Group. Protocol for the BAG-RECALL clinical trial: a prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled trial to determine whether a bispectral index-guided protocol is superior to an anesthesia gas-guided protocol in reducing intraoperative awareness with explicit recall in high risk surgical patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2009 Nov 30;9:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-9-8.

  • Mashour GA, Tremper KK, Avidan MS. Protocol for the "Michigan Awareness Control Study": A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing electronic alerts based on bispectral index monitoring or minimum alveolar concentration for the prevention of intraoperative awareness. BMC Anesthesiol. 2009 Nov 5;9:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-9-7.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Consciousness Monitors

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Surgical EquipmentEquipment and Supplies

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. George A Mashour
Organization
University of Michigan

Study Officials

  • George A. Mashour, M.D., Ph.D.

    University of Michigan

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology and Neurosurgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2008

First Posted

June 3, 2008

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion

April 1, 2010

Study Completion

June 1, 2010

Last Updated

December 7, 2017

Results First Posted

November 17, 2014

Record last verified: 2017-11

Locations