Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept in Active RA Despite Methotrexate Therapy in Japan
JESMR
1 other identifier
interventional
151
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Multi-center, parallel-group, randomized, open control study. All patients will be selected to two treatment groups.
- 1.Etanercept alone treatment group (25mg, twice/week, s.c.)
- 2.Etanercept combined with MTX group (25mg, twice/week, s.c.+MTX 6-8mg/week)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 rheumatoid-arthritis
Started Jun 2005
Longer than P75 for phase_4 rheumatoid-arthritis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 25, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 2, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 1, 2015
CompletedOctober 1, 2015
September 1, 2015
3.3 years
May 25, 2008
March 29, 2012
September 1, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
EULAR Good Response
EULAR good response was defined as reaching, at least, low decease activity by the disease activity score of 28 joints (DAS28) and its improvement by \> 1.2. DAS28 is a quantitative composite measure of disease activity for rheumatoid arthritis, and DAS28 \< 3.2 is regarded as low disease activity.
at 24 weeks
ACR50 Response Rate
ACR (American College of Rheumatology) 50 response is defined by the following definition of improvement: at least 50% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and at least 50% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR-core set measures; patient and physician global assessments, pain, disability, and an acute phase reactant (erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein).
at 24 weeks
Radiographic Progression Defined by Change in Van Der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Score
The van der Heijde-modifiedtotal Sharp score is the sum of scores for erosions and joint space narrowing. The minimum and maximum total scores are 0 and 448, respectively. The maximum number of erosions is 160 in the hands and 120 in the feet; and the maximum scores for joint space narrowing are 120 and 48, respectively. Erosions are scored 1 for a discrete interruption of the cortical surface, and scored 2-5 for a larger defect according to the surface area of the joint involved. Notably, the maximum erosion score in each joint in hands is 5, while it is 10 in the feet. For joint space narrowing, 0=normal; 1=focal or doubtful; 2=general, \<50% of the original joint space; 3=general, \>50% of the original joint space or subluxation; 4=ankylosis.
at 52 weeks
Study Arms (2)
ETN Alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORetanercept (25mg, twice/week, s.c.)
ETN+MTX
ACTIVE COMPARATORetanercept (25mg, twice/week, s.c.) combined with methotrexate (6-8mg/week)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients had to be at least 18 years of age
- fulfilled the 1987 revised classification criteria for RA by in American College of Rheumatology (ACR)
- met the guidelines for the proper use of ETN in Japan (having at least 6 tender joints and 6 swollen joints
- either serum C-reactive protein more than 2 mg/dl or ESR no less than 28 mm at 1 hour, with adequate safety profiles)
- be ACR functional class I-III
- have been receiving MTX 6 mg/week for a minimum of 3 months at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks at the time of study enrollment
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who required concurrent use of prednisone (PSL) \>10 mg/day, or its equivalent, were excluded from study entry
- the start of dose increment of PSL equivalents within 3 months of the study enrollment
- experience of antirheumatic therapy except for MTX and PSL equivalents
- previous treatment with ETN or any other biological treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Keio University
Tokyo, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
Related Publications (3)
Kameda H, Ueki Y, Saito K, Nagaoka S, Hidaka T, Atsumi T, Tsukano M, Kasama T, Shiozawa S, Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T; Japan Biological Agent Study Integrated Consortium. Etanercept (ETN) with methotrexate (MTX) is better than ETN monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite MTX therapy: a randomized trial. Mod Rheumatol. 2010 Dec;20(6):531-8. doi: 10.1007/s10165-010-0324-4. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
PMID: 20574649RESULTKameda H, Kanbe K, Sato E, Ueki Y, Saito K, Nagaoka S, Hidaka T, Atsumi T, Tsukano M, Kasama T, Shiozawa S, Tanaka Y, Yamanaka H, Takeuchi T. Continuation of methotrexate resulted in better clinical and radiographic outcomes than discontinuation upon starting etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 52-week results from the JESMR study. J Rheumatol. 2011 Aug;38(8):1585-92. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110014. Epub 2011 May 15.
PMID: 21572151RESULTKameda H, Kanbe K, Sato E, Ueki Y, Saito K, Nagaoka S, Hidaka T, Atsumi T, Tsukano M, Kasama T, Shiozawa S, Tanaka Y, Yamanaka H, Takeuchi T; Japan Biological Agent Integrated Consortium (JBASIC). A merged presentation of clinical and radiographic data using probability plots in a clinical trial, the JESMR study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Feb;72(2):310-2. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201804. Epub 2012 Sep 12. No abstract available.
PMID: 22975754RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Hideto Kameda
- Organization
- School of Medicine, Toho University
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Tsutomu Takeuchi, MD, PhD
JBASIC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Toho University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 25, 2008
First Posted
June 2, 2008
Study Start
June 1, 2005
Primary Completion
October 1, 2008
Study Completion
October 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 1, 2015
Results First Posted
October 1, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-09