NCT00688103

Brief Summary

Multi-center, parallel-group, randomized, open control study. All patients will be selected to two treatment groups.

  1. 1.Etanercept alone treatment group (25mg, twice/week, s.c.)
  2. 2.Etanercept combined with MTX group (25mg, twice/week, s.c.+MTX 6-8mg/week)

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
151

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 rheumatoid-arthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2005

Longer than P75 for phase_4 rheumatoid-arthritis

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2005

Completed
3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 25, 2008

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 2, 2008

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2008

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2010

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

October 1, 2015

Status Verified

September 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

May 25, 2008

Results QC Date

March 29, 2012

Last Update Submit

September 1, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • EULAR Good Response

    EULAR good response was defined as reaching, at least, low decease activity by the disease activity score of 28 joints (DAS28) and its improvement by \> 1.2. DAS28 is a quantitative composite measure of disease activity for rheumatoid arthritis, and DAS28 \< 3.2 is regarded as low disease activity.

    at 24 weeks

  • ACR50 Response Rate

    ACR (American College of Rheumatology) 50 response is defined by the following definition of improvement: at least 50% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and at least 50% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR-core set measures; patient and physician global assessments, pain, disability, and an acute phase reactant (erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein).

    at 24 weeks

  • Radiographic Progression Defined by Change in Van Der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Score

    The van der Heijde-modifiedtotal Sharp score is the sum of scores for erosions and joint space narrowing. The minimum and maximum total scores are 0 and 448, respectively. The maximum number of erosions is 160 in the hands and 120 in the feet; and the maximum scores for joint space narrowing are 120 and 48, respectively. Erosions are scored 1 for a discrete interruption of the cortical surface, and scored 2-5 for a larger defect according to the surface area of the joint involved. Notably, the maximum erosion score in each joint in hands is 5, while it is 10 in the feet. For joint space narrowing, 0=normal; 1=focal or doubtful; 2=general, \<50% of the original joint space; 3=general, \>50% of the original joint space or subluxation; 4=ankylosis.

    at 52 weeks

Study Arms (2)

ETN Alone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

etanercept (25mg, twice/week, s.c.)

Drug: ETN Alone

ETN+MTX

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

etanercept (25mg, twice/week, s.c.) combined with methotrexate (6-8mg/week)

Drug: ETN+MTX

Interventions

etanercept (25 mg, twice/week, s.c.)

Also known as: etanercept
ETN Alone

etanercept (25 mg, twice/week, s.c.) combined with methotrexate (6-8 mg/week)

Also known as: etanercept and methotrexate
ETN+MTX

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients had to be at least 18 years of age
  • fulfilled the 1987 revised classification criteria for RA by in American College of Rheumatology (ACR)
  • met the guidelines for the proper use of ETN in Japan (having at least 6 tender joints and 6 swollen joints
  • either serum C-reactive protein more than 2 mg/dl or ESR no less than 28 mm at 1 hour, with adequate safety profiles)
  • be ACR functional class I-III
  • have been receiving MTX 6 mg/week for a minimum of 3 months at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks at the time of study enrollment

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who required concurrent use of prednisone (PSL) \>10 mg/day, or its equivalent, were excluded from study entry
  • the start of dose increment of PSL equivalents within 3 months of the study enrollment
  • experience of antirheumatic therapy except for MTX and PSL equivalents
  • previous treatment with ETN or any other biological treatment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Keio University

Tokyo, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Kameda H, Ueki Y, Saito K, Nagaoka S, Hidaka T, Atsumi T, Tsukano M, Kasama T, Shiozawa S, Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T; Japan Biological Agent Study Integrated Consortium. Etanercept (ETN) with methotrexate (MTX) is better than ETN monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite MTX therapy: a randomized trial. Mod Rheumatol. 2010 Dec;20(6):531-8. doi: 10.1007/s10165-010-0324-4. Epub 2010 Jun 24.

  • Kameda H, Kanbe K, Sato E, Ueki Y, Saito K, Nagaoka S, Hidaka T, Atsumi T, Tsukano M, Kasama T, Shiozawa S, Tanaka Y, Yamanaka H, Takeuchi T. Continuation of methotrexate resulted in better clinical and radiographic outcomes than discontinuation upon starting etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 52-week results from the JESMR study. J Rheumatol. 2011 Aug;38(8):1585-92. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110014. Epub 2011 May 15.

  • Kameda H, Kanbe K, Sato E, Ueki Y, Saito K, Nagaoka S, Hidaka T, Atsumi T, Tsukano M, Kasama T, Shiozawa S, Tanaka Y, Yamanaka H, Takeuchi T; Japan Biological Agent Integrated Consortium (JBASIC). A merged presentation of clinical and radiographic data using probability plots in a clinical trial, the JESMR study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Feb;72(2):310-2. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201804. Epub 2012 Sep 12. No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Interventions

EtanerceptMethotrexate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Immunoglobulin Fc FragmentsImmunoglobulin FragmentsPeptide FragmentsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsImmunoglobulin Constant RegionsImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulinsReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorReceptors, CytokineReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, Cell SurfaceMembrane ProteinsAminopterinPterinsPteridinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Hideto Kameda
Organization
School of Medicine, Toho University

Study Officials

  • Tsutomu Takeuchi, MD, PhD

    JBASIC

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
NETWORK
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, Toho University

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2008

First Posted

June 2, 2008

Study Start

June 1, 2005

Primary Completion

October 1, 2008

Study Completion

October 1, 2010

Last Updated

October 1, 2015

Results First Posted

October 1, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-09

Locations