Study Stopped
Enrollment closed
Treatment w/ Tri-Luma® Cream & Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) vs a Mild Inactive Control Cream & Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) in Melasma
Split-Face, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Sequential Treatment With Tri-Luma® Cream With Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) vs. a Mild Inactive Control Cream With Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) in Subjects With Melasma
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tri-Luma® Cream (fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%, hydroquinone 4%, tretinoin 0.05%) when used sequentially with a series of intense pulsed light (IPL) treatments in Subjects diagnosed with moderate to severe melasma during a 10 week treatment period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 11, 2010
CompletedAugust 23, 2022
September 1, 2012
9 months
April 24, 2008
September 25, 2009
July 28, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Who Were a Success or Failure With Regards to Melasma Severity at Week 10 as Evaluated Using the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of Melasma
Number of participants who were a success or failure with regards to melasma severity at Week 10 as evaluated using the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of melasma (0 = Clear, 1 = Almost Clear, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, 4 = Severe) with Clear / Almost Clear being success and all others being failure
Baseline to week 10
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Number of Participants Who Were a Success or Failure With Regards to Melasma Severity at Week 6 Using the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of Melasma With Clear/Almost Clear Being Success and All Others Being Failure
Baseline to week 6
Degree of Pigmentation (Melanin) Using a Mexameter at Weeks 6 and 10
Baseline to Week 6 and Baseline to Week 10
Number of Participants Showing Success or Failure in Improvement of Melasma at Week 6 Using the Investigator's Evaluation of Improvement
Baseline to week 6
Number of Participants Showing Success or Failure in Improvement of Melasma at Week 10 Using the Investigator's Evaluation of Improvement
Baseline to week 10
Number of Participants Showing Success or Failure in Improvement of Melasma at Week 6 Using the Subject's Evaluation of Improvement
Baseline to week 6
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
IPL / Tri-Luma® Cream
ACTIVE COMPARATORIPL/Cetaphil® Moisturizing Cream as Inactive Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Applied once daily at bedtime on one side of the face; this was a randomized, split face study where one cream was used on the right side of the face and the other cream on the left side of the face and IPL (Intense Pulsed Light) was used on both sides of the face.
Applied once daily at bedtime on the opposite side of the face; this was a randomized, split face study where one cream was used on the right side of the face and the other cream on the left side of the face and IPL (Intense Pulsed Light) was used on both sides of the face.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects diagnosed with moderate to severe melasma on both sides of the face (Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) at baseline must be 3 or 4.)
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with a diagnosis of skin cancer (Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC), Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC), Melanoma) in the areas to be treated
- Subjects with prior facial Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), resurfacing, deep or chemical peels within 6 months of the date of study entry
- Subject has initiated treatment with hormones including estrogen, progesterone and/or oral contraceptives within 3 months of study entry, or who intend to discontinue hormonal therapy during the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Galderma R&Dlead
Study Sites (2)
Dermatology/Cosmetic Laser Associates of La Jolla, Inc.
La Jolla, California, 92037, United States
Tennessee Clinical Research Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37215, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ronald W. Gottschalk, MD / Medical Director
- Organization
- Galderma Laboratories, L.P.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ron W Gottschalk, MD
Galderma R&D
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2008
First Posted
April 29, 2008
Study Start
January 1, 2008
Primary Completion
October 1, 2008
Study Completion
October 1, 2008
Last Updated
August 23, 2022
Results First Posted
January 11, 2010
Record last verified: 2012-09