Remifentanil and Propofol Versus Fentanyl and Midazolam for Sedation During Therapeutic Hypothermia. A Randomised, Controlled Trial
Cool Sedation
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to increase knowledge about drug properties and effects during therapeutic hypothermia. The primary end point of this study is the time from termination of sedation to extubation in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia, after treatment with the combination remifentanil and propofol versus that of fentanyl and midazolam.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Apr 2008
Typical duration for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 25, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2010
CompletedDecember 29, 2023
December 1, 2023
1.1 years
April 23, 2008
December 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
time from termination of sedation to extubation in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia, after treatment with the combination remifentanil and propofol versus that of fentanyl and midazolam.
2010
Study Arms (2)
Study group 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORMidazolam and fentanyl; continuous intravenous infusions
Study group 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORPropofol and remifentanil; continuous intravenous infusion
Interventions
Patients will receive: propofol, continuous intravenous infusion, concentration 10 mg/ml, 1-4 mg/kg/hour and remifentanil; continuous intravenous infusion 0,050 mg/ml, 0.1-0.3 microgram/kg/min. Drugs are administered to sedate the patients as part of normal treatment for as long as sedation is needed. Doses are titrated to achieve the desired level of sedation.
Patients will receive: midazolam; continuous intravenous infusion, concentration 5 mg/ml, 2-10 mg/hour and fentanyl; continuous intravenous infusion, concentration 0,050 mg/ml, 0.025-0.5 mg/hour. Drugs are administered to sedate the patients as part of normal treatment for as long as sedation is needed. Doses are titrated to achieve the desired level of sedation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Treatment with therapeutic hypothermia following cardiac arrest (33-34°C) and analgesia/sedation required
- Patients must be 18 years or older
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women
- Cardiovascular unstable patients in a deteriorating circulatory status which require multiple other therapeutic measures that makes participation practically impossible
- Liver or renal failure defined as sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA)-score 3 or 4
- History of drug allergies, or contraindications for the study drugs
- Patients using a scheduled dose of any of the study drugs.
- Patients with a known substance abuse of opioids or benzodiazepines
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Norwegian University of Science and Technologylead
- St. Olavs Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Stavanger University Hospital
Stavanger, Rogaland, 4068, Norway
St. Olavs Hospital
Trondheim, Sør-Trøndelag, 7006, Norway
Related Publications (1)
Bjelland TW, Dale O, Kaisen K, Haugen BO, Lydersen S, Strand K, Klepstad P. Propofol and remifentanil versus midazolam and fentanyl for sedation during therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: a randomised trial. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Jun;38(6):959-67. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2540-1. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
PMID: 22527063RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pål Klepstad, MD, PhD
National Taiwan Normal University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2008
First Posted
April 25, 2008
Study Start
April 1, 2008
Primary Completion
May 1, 2009
Study Completion
June 1, 2010
Last Updated
December 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12