NCT00667043

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to increase knowledge about drug properties and effects during therapeutic hypothermia. The primary end point of this study is the time from termination of sedation to extubation in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia, after treatment with the combination remifentanil and propofol versus that of fentanyl and midazolam.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2008

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2008

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 23, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 25, 2008

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2009

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

December 29, 2023

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

April 23, 2008

Last Update Submit

December 28, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

therapeutic hypothermiacardiac arrestsedationremifentanilpropofolfentanylmidazolam

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • time from termination of sedation to extubation in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia, after treatment with the combination remifentanil and propofol versus that of fentanyl and midazolam.

    2010

Study Arms (2)

Study group 1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Midazolam and fentanyl; continuous intravenous infusions

Drug: fentanyl and midazolam

Study group 2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Propofol and remifentanil; continuous intravenous infusion

Drug: remifentanil and propofol

Interventions

Patients will receive: propofol, continuous intravenous infusion, concentration 10 mg/ml, 1-4 mg/kg/hour and remifentanil; continuous intravenous infusion 0,050 mg/ml, 0.1-0.3 microgram/kg/min. Drugs are administered to sedate the patients as part of normal treatment for as long as sedation is needed. Doses are titrated to achieve the desired level of sedation.

Study group 2

Patients will receive: midazolam; continuous intravenous infusion, concentration 5 mg/ml, 2-10 mg/hour and fentanyl; continuous intravenous infusion, concentration 0,050 mg/ml, 0.025-0.5 mg/hour. Drugs are administered to sedate the patients as part of normal treatment for as long as sedation is needed. Doses are titrated to achieve the desired level of sedation.

Study group 1

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Treatment with therapeutic hypothermia following cardiac arrest (33-34°C) and analgesia/sedation required
  • Patients must be 18 years or older

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant women
  • Cardiovascular unstable patients in a deteriorating circulatory status which require multiple other therapeutic measures that makes participation practically impossible
  • Liver or renal failure defined as sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA)-score 3 or 4
  • History of drug allergies, or contraindications for the study drugs
  • Patients using a scheduled dose of any of the study drugs.
  • Patients with a known substance abuse of opioids or benzodiazepines

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Stavanger University Hospital

Stavanger, Rogaland, 4068, Norway

Location

St. Olavs Hospital

Trondheim, Sør-Trøndelag, 7006, Norway

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bjelland TW, Dale O, Kaisen K, Haugen BO, Lydersen S, Strand K, Klepstad P. Propofol and remifentanil versus midazolam and fentanyl for sedation during therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: a randomised trial. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Jun;38(6):959-67. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2540-1. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HypothermiaHeart Arrest

Interventions

RemifentanilPropofolFentanylMidazolam

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Body Temperature ChangesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsHeart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PropionatesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsBenzodiazepinesBenzazepinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring

Study Officials

  • Pål Klepstad, MD, PhD

    National Taiwan Normal University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2008

First Posted

April 25, 2008

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion

May 1, 2009

Study Completion

June 1, 2010

Last Updated

December 29, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-12

Locations