Aerobic Exercise, Resistance Exercise, or Flexibility and Relaxation Training in Inactive Older Female Breast Cancer Survivors
Comparison of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise in Older Breast Cancer Survivors
5 other identifiers
interventional
115
1 country
1
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, and flexibility and relaxation training may reduce fatigue and improve the health and quality of life of breast cancer survivors. It is not yet known which type of exercise is more effective for inactive older female breast cancer survivors. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying aerobic exercise to see how well it works compared with resistance exercise or flexibility and relaxation training in improving the health and quality of life of inactive older female breast cancer survivors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Mar 2008
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 18, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2010
CompletedOctober 15, 2015
October 1, 2015
2.3 years
April 18, 2008
October 13, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Comparison of the effects of aerobic exercise vs flexibility and relaxation training (control) on fatigue, aerobic capacity, functioning, and health outcomes as measured at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months
baseline,3 ,6 ,12, and 18 months
Comparison of the effects of resistance exercise vs flexibility and relaxation training (control) on fatigue, muscle strength, functioning, and health outcomes as measured at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months
baseline, 3 , 6 ,12, and 18 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Comparison of the relative effects of aerobic exercise vs resistance exercise on fatigue, physical functioning, physical health, and mental health as measured at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months
baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months
Determination of the mediating effects of fatigue and fitness on the relationship between exercise and physical functioning as measured at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months
baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months
Comparison of the individual and relative effects of aerobic exercise vs resistance exercise vs flexibility and relaxation training (control) on body composition and on biomarkers of cancer recurrence as measured at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 ...
baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months
Study Arms (3)
progressive, aerobic exercise program
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients undergo aerobic exercise training over approximately 45 minutes (not including warm-up or cool-down exercises) 3 days a week for 18 months.
progressive, resistance exercise program
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients undergo resistance exercise training 3 days a week for 18 months.
flexibility and relaxation training [control]
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients perform a series of whole body flexibility (stretching) and relaxation (guided imagery, progressive neuromuscular relaxation, focused breathing) exercises 3 days a week for 18 months.
Interventions
Arm I (progressive, aerobic exercise program): Patients undergo aerobic exercise training over approximately 45 minutes (not including warm-up or cool-down exercises) 3 days a week for 18 months. Arm II (progressive, resistance exercise program): Patients undergo resistance exercise training 3 days a week for 18 months.
All biomarkers will be measured from urine, blood and plasma obtained from participants by the Oregon Health \& Science University (OHSU) General Clinical Research Center (GCRC). Upon exit from the study we will confirm the presence/absence of metastatic disease, via verbal verification by the subject, in order to ensure that biomarkers were primarily reflective of bone turnover changes and not to metastases.
Patients complete questionnaires at baseline and periodically during the study to assess demographic (i.e., age, income) and disease-specific (i.e., stage, treatment) variables, self-report mental and physical function, presence of chronic medical conditions, symptoms, fatigue, exercise outside the study exercise intervention, dietary intake, and psychosocial function.
Administered at measured at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months
Follow-up every 6 months (measured at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months )
The Schwartz Cancer Fatigue (SCF) scale, a 6-item scale that specifically assesses the level of subjective fatigue that the participant is currently experiencing. The SCF has been used to measure fatigue in previous exercise studies. The Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS) consists of 22 items and four subscales: behavioral/severity, affective meaning, sensory and cognitive/mood. The scale has been shown to detect reductions in fatigue in cancer patients undergoing behavioral interventions to reduce fatigue, including exercise. Responses are averaged for subscale and total scores with higher scores indicating more fatigue. The PFS has been used to measure fatigue in previous studies of illness and/or medical treatments. 15 minute survey
An interim safety/efficacy review will occur after the first half of enrolled participants completes their 3 month testing appointment (or after 3 months of exercise). The interim safety review will be overseen by OHSU NCI-designated Cancer Institute, while the efficacy review will be conducted by an independent monitor, Dr. George Knafl, a biostatistician in the OHSU School of Nursing, who is not a member of the study personnel.
We will include a 6-item measure of self-efficacy for exercise that has been validated in adults (Nigg, 2002) and has been used by Dr. Bennett (Co-I) in current work in cancer survivors. 5 min. survey
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- OHSU Knight Cancer Institutelead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239-3098, United States
Related Publications (2)
Winters-Stone KM, Torgrimson-Ojerio B, Dieckmann NF, Stoyles S, Mitri Z, Luoh SW. A randomized-controlled trial comparing supervised aerobic training to resistance training followed by unsupervised exercise on physical functioning in older breast cancer survivors. J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Mar;13(2):152-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
PMID: 34426142DERIVEDWinters-Stone KM, Wood LJ, Stoyles S, Dieckmann NF. The Effects of Resistance Exercise on Biomarkers of Breast Cancer Prognosis: A Pooled Analysis of Three Randomized Trials. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Feb;27(2):146-153. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0766. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
PMID: 29141853DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kerri Winters-Stone, PhD
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 18, 2008
First Posted
April 21, 2008
Study Start
March 1, 2008
Primary Completion
June 1, 2010
Study Completion
June 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 15, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10