A Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of RMT Medical Technology's SafeFlo® Vena Cava Filter
1 other identifier
interventional
117
6 countries
8
Brief Summary
To determine the safety and effectiveness of the SafeFlo filter for permanent protection against pulmonary emboli. All patients will be selected to receive the filter according to the stated inclusion / exclusion criteria after consultation between the attending physician and interventional radiologist. Patients with a permanent implantation will be followed for up to 6 months. Clinical success will be defined as no occurrences of any of the following events: recurrent pulmonary embolism, IVC occlusion or filter embolization. The proportion of permanent filter patients considered to be a clinical success will be the primary efficacy parameter.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2003
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2008
CompletedMay 31, 2013
May 1, 2013
4.7 years
March 30, 2008
May 30, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical success will be defined as no occurrences of any of the following events: recurrent pulmonary embolism, IVC occlusion or filter embolization.
6 months follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The proportion of patients with successful deployment of the filter will be calculated and presented with a 95% exact confidence interval.
3 and 6 months follow-up
Study Arms (1)
Single arm
EXPERIMENTALSafeFlo IVC Filter
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Traditional indications for vena cava filter in patients with established DVT or PE, including (40):
- Patients with proven Pulmonary Embolus (PE) or Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and one or more of the following:
- Contraindication to anticoagulation
- Complication of anticoagulation
- Failure of anticoagulation
- Recurrent PE despite adequate anticoagulation therapy
- Inability to achieve adequate anticoagulation
- Poor compliance with anticoagulation medications
- Extended indications for vena cava filter placement in patients with established DVT or PE, including the following (31, 40):
- Large free-floating thrombus in the iliac vein or IVC;
- Following massive PE in which recurrent emboli may prove fatal;
- During/after surgical or transcatheter embolectomy;
- Filter placement in high-risk trauma and orthopedic patients:
- High risk trauma or orthopedic patients who cannot receive anticoagulation because of increased bleeding risk, and have one or more of the following injury patterns (31, 40):
- Severe closed head injury (GCS \< 8);
- +4 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- All patients under 18 years of age.
- All patients undergoing emergency procedures.
- All patients with abnormal IVC anatomy or pathology of the IVC such as thrombosis or tumor which prevent safe filter implantation.
- All patients with an IVC diameter which precludes oversizing of the filter platform.
- All patients with active infection / bacteremia.
- All patients with sensitivity to contrast media.
- Uncorrectable severe coagulopathy (e.g., patients with liver or multisystem failure).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
Holy Name Hospital
Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
Mt. Sinai Hospital
Manhattan, New York, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, United States
University Hospital Vienna
Vienna, Austria
251 Air Force Hospital
Athens, Greece
Rabin Medical Center
Petah Tikva, Israel
Universitas Hospital
Bloemfontein, South Africa
Queen Margaret Hospital
Dumfermline, Scotland, United Kingdom
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jacob Cynamon, Dr.
Montefiore Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2008
First Posted
April 9, 2008
Study Start
July 1, 2003
Primary Completion
March 1, 2008
Study Completion
March 1, 2008
Last Updated
May 31, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-05