Humidification in Laparoscopic Colonic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
82
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Laparoscopic surgery allows surgeons to remove bowel via small incisions. To allow insertion of a camera and instruments, cold and dry gas is blown into the abdominal cavity. This project investigates the use of warmed, humidified gas in laparoscopic surgery. The hypothesis is that this will result in less damage to internal surfaces, and shorten recovery time. Previous studies have demonstrated positive outcomes in laparoscopic gallbladder operations. The investigators plan to study patients undergoing laparoscopic colon operations, as these operations are longer and the effect of humidification will be magnified. The investigators will enroll 74 patients: 37 will have the operation with cold dry gas, and 37 will have warm, humidified gas. The investigators will measure intraoperative heat loss, postoperative pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and time to return of bowel function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2008
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 17, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedMarch 11, 2014
March 1, 2014
1.2 years
March 17, 2008
March 10, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain by visual analogue scale
preop, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, day 1, day 2, day 3, day 7, day 14, day 30, day 60
Morphine equivalent analgesia use
PACU, day of OT, day 1, day 2, day 3, total in hospital
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Intraoperative temperature by esophageal probe
15 min intervals during surgery
Plasma and peritoneal cytokine concentration
Morning of surgery
Antiemetic use
PACU, day of OT, day 1, day 2, day 3
Return of bowel function - passage of flatus, bm, and eating first meal
daily
Any complications
Up to 3 months postoperatively
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Small bowel obstruction
5 year followup
Survival
5 year followup
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALHumidified and warmed carbon dioxide laparoscopic insufflation.
2
PLACEBO COMPARATORCold and dry carbon dioxide laparoscopic insufflation.
Interventions
Humidification to 98% relative humidity, and warming to 37 degrees C of laparoscopic insufflate. This will be done for the duration of the operation.
No humidifier or warmer will be used (device switched off). This will deliver laparoscopic insufflate at 0% humidity and 20 degrees C.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients 15 years and over undergoing elective laparoscopic colonic resection at all three auckland hospitals
You may not qualify if:
- Acute cases
- Stoma formation (preop or intraop decision)
- Decision to change to open surgery preoperatively (intraop conversions included as intention to treat)
- Rectal lesions defined as 15 cm from anal verge on imaging and/or sigmoidoscopy / colonoscopy
- Steroid dependence
- Inability to consent or answer SRS questions due to cognitive impairment or language barrier
- ASA \>= 4
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Middlemore Hospital
Auckland, Otahuhu, New Zealand
Auckland City Hospital
Auckland, New Zealand
North Shore Hospital
Auckland, New Zealand
Related Publications (1)
Sammour T, Hill AG. Five year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial on warming and humidification of insufflation gas in laparoscopic colonic surgery--impact on small bowel obstruction and oncologic outcomes. Int Surg. 2015 Apr;100(4):608-16. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00210.1.
PMID: 25875541DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Andrew G Hill, MBChB, MD, FRACS
University of Auckland, New Zealand
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2008
First Posted
March 24, 2008
Study Start
April 1, 2008
Primary Completion
June 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
March 11, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03