LaPAroscopic Low pRessure cOlorectal Surgery
PAROS
1 other identifier
interventional
138
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Laparoscopy by its mini-invasive character has revolutionized abdominal and colorectal surgery but certain limitations remains (post-operative pain due to pneumoperitoneum, pneumoperitoneum stability, visibility during bleeding, smoke evacuation). The medical device for continuous pressure insufflation during laparoscopic procedures Airseal® would allow the maintenance of pneumoperitoneum at a lower pressure. The stable low pressure (7mmHg) is described in the literature for 15 years as the best way to reduce scapular pain, but until the marketing of Airseal, working at 7mmHg was not possible because the space of work was not stable. Moreover, this device makes it possible to obtain a better vision because of the evacuation of the fumes potentially leading to a reduction in the operating time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 7, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 25, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 26, 2020
CompletedOctober 8, 2020
October 1, 2020
1.4 years
January 8, 2019
October 6, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Length of postoperative hospital stay
To determine the length of hospitalization
From surgery to the end of the hospitalization (max 30 days)
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Surgery time
During surgery
Appreciation of visual quality by surgeon
During surgery
Impact of the use of microlaparoscopic instruments
During surgery
Rates of conversion
During surgery
Blood pressure (mmHg)
During surgery
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm A: Low Pressure (5-7 mmHg)
EXPERIMENTALLaparoscopic colectomy surgery with low pressure (5-7mmHg)
Arm B: Standard pressure (12-15 mmHg)
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaparoscopic colectomy surgery with standard pressure (12-15mmHg)
Interventions
Medical device set to the mode Airseal®, pressure adjustment between 5 and 7 mmHg
Medical device set to the mode "Standard Insufflation", pressure adjustment between 12 and 15 mmHg
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18
- Colonic resection (right or left) performed for benign or malignant pathology
- Laparoscopic procedure
- Informed consent signed
- Social Insurance
You may not qualify if:
- Laparotomy procedure
- Associated resection (except appendectomy or liver biopsy
- Emergency procedure
- Pelvic sepsis
- Pregnant or breast-feeding woman.
- Persons deprived of liberty or under guardianship
- Impossibility for compliance to follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chu de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, France
Related Publications (1)
Celarier S, Monziols S, Celerier B, Assenat V, Carles P, Napolitano G, Laclau-Lacrouts M, Rullier E, Ouattara A, Denost Q. Low-pressure versus standard pressure laparoscopic colorectal surgery (PAROS trial): a phase III randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg. 2021 Aug 19;108(8):998-1005. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab069.
PMID: 33755088DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Quentin DENOST
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The study will be carried out: * Blind patient: The patient will not know the group he belongs to, in order to minimize the bias related to the self-evaluation of postoperative pain * Blind for the outpatient evaluator: the surgeon will blindly evaluate the primary endpoint: patient's discharge criteria. This "evaluator" surgeon will be different from the "operator" surgeon The blind will minimize the measurement bias.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2019
First Posted
January 23, 2019
Study Start
January 7, 2019
Primary Completion
May 25, 2020
Study Completion
June 26, 2020
Last Updated
October 8, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share