NCT00633113

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical, radiographic (x-ray) and cost effectiveness outcomes (cost relative to risks and benefits) of two different minimally invasive knee joint replacement surgical techniques. The primary study hypothesis is that in comparing total knee replacement performed with the two different surgical techniques that respect four minimally invasive surgery principles (low-profile instrumentation, "minimally invasive" incision, overall minimal knee surgical intervention), a faster return to function will result when the technique does not incise the tendon.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
131

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2007

Longer than P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2007

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 4, 2008

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 11, 2008

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

April 29, 2013

Status Verified

April 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

March 4, 2008

Last Update Submit

April 25, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Total Knee ArthroplastyMinimally Invasive Knee ReplacementKnee OsteoarthritisCost effectiveness minimally invasive knee surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Primary outcome: clinical outcomes in the Subvastus Total Knee Arthroplasty versus Medial Parapatellar surgical groups, using the Knee Society Score.

    5 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Secondary outcome: Includes cost-effectiveness of the Subvastus Total Knee Arthroplasty versus Medial Parapatellar surgical groups; EQ-5D, SF-12; radiographic assessment using Knee Society Radiographic Assessment.

    5 years

Study Arms (2)

1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

\- Medial Parapatellar Arthrotomy (MPPA) technique

Procedure: MPPA

2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

\- Subvastus (SV) technique

Procedure: SV

Interventions

MPPAPROCEDURE

\- Medial Parapatellar Arthrotomy

1
SVPROCEDURE

\- Subvastus Technique

2

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Presence of severely symptomatic knee osteoarthritis that has failed non- operative treatment
  • Males and non-pregnant females, 35-85 years of age at the time of surgery
  • ASA class 1 or 2
  • Procedure will not require computer navigation
  • Patient/Surgeon has not requested another implant
  • Patient has signed an IRB approved study consent form
  • Patient is able and willing to actively participate in post-operative rehabilitation program
  • Patient understands study requirements
  • Patient is willing to comply with follow-up visits and diary documentations
  • Patient is capable of independent ambulation

You may not qualify if:

  • Skeletal immaturity
  • More than 10 degrees of valgus or varus deformity as measured from a weight bearing AP alignment view
  • Patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis who are considering a simultaneous bilateral procedure
  • Bone or ligament insufficiency that requires the use of augments or stems, or constrained component
  • Daily pre-operative use of narcotic pain medication
  • Prior knee arthroplasty
  • Patient is a prisoner
  • Patient has had prior tibial tubercle osteotomy
  • Patient's surgical knee would require removal of hardware prior to TKA
  • Patient has \< 95 degrees flexion pre-operatively

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Interventions

15-phenyl-beta-methylpentadecanoic acid

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Ivan M Tomek, MD

    Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2008

First Posted

March 11, 2008

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion

September 1, 2012

Study Completion

September 1, 2012

Last Updated

April 29, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-04

Locations