Minimally Invasive Knee Replacement Outcomes (MIKRO) Study
MIKRO
A Randomized, Prospective, Blinded Clinical Trial Comparing Two Total Knee Replacement Techniques
1 other identifier
interventional
131
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical, radiographic (x-ray) and cost effectiveness outcomes (cost relative to risks and benefits) of two different minimally invasive knee joint replacement surgical techniques. The primary study hypothesis is that in comparing total knee replacement performed with the two different surgical techniques that respect four minimally invasive surgery principles (low-profile instrumentation, "minimally invasive" incision, overall minimal knee surgical intervention), a faster return to function will result when the technique does not incise the tendon.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started Nov 2007
Longer than P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 4, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2012
CompletedApril 29, 2013
April 1, 2013
4.8 years
March 4, 2008
April 25, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary outcome: clinical outcomes in the Subvastus Total Knee Arthroplasty versus Medial Parapatellar surgical groups, using the Knee Society Score.
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Secondary outcome: Includes cost-effectiveness of the Subvastus Total Knee Arthroplasty versus Medial Parapatellar surgical groups; EQ-5D, SF-12; radiographic assessment using Knee Society Radiographic Assessment.
5 years
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATOR\- Medial Parapatellar Arthrotomy (MPPA) technique
2
ACTIVE COMPARATOR\- Subvastus (SV) technique
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presence of severely symptomatic knee osteoarthritis that has failed non- operative treatment
- Males and non-pregnant females, 35-85 years of age at the time of surgery
- ASA class 1 or 2
- Procedure will not require computer navigation
- Patient/Surgeon has not requested another implant
- Patient has signed an IRB approved study consent form
- Patient is able and willing to actively participate in post-operative rehabilitation program
- Patient understands study requirements
- Patient is willing to comply with follow-up visits and diary documentations
- Patient is capable of independent ambulation
You may not qualify if:
- Skeletal immaturity
- More than 10 degrees of valgus or varus deformity as measured from a weight bearing AP alignment view
- Patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis who are considering a simultaneous bilateral procedure
- Bone or ligament insufficiency that requires the use of augments or stems, or constrained component
- Daily pre-operative use of narcotic pain medication
- Prior knee arthroplasty
- Patient is a prisoner
- Patient has had prior tibial tubercle osteotomy
- Patient's surgical knee would require removal of hardware prior to TKA
- Patient has \< 95 degrees flexion pre-operatively
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Centerlead
- Zimmer Biometcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ivan M Tomek, MD
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2008
First Posted
March 11, 2008
Study Start
November 1, 2007
Primary Completion
September 1, 2012
Study Completion
September 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 29, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-04