PRET: Patients Prone to Recurrence After Endovascular Treatment
PRET
1 other identifier
interventional
447
6 countries
32
Brief Summary
The PRET study aims at comparing two types of coils used in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The first type made of platinum has been used for more than 15 years. The other, referred to as hydrocoil, containing in addition to platinum a polymer layer that expands when in contact with blood, has been in use since 2002. The hypothesis of the PRET study is that the newer hydrocoil will be more effective and yet as safe as the older platinum coil.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jun 2007
Longer than P75 for phase_4
32 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 29, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 1, 2019
CompletedMarch 26, 2019
July 1, 2016
8.3 years
February 21, 2008
August 1, 2017
March 12, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrence Rate of Target Aneurysm.
1. major angiographic recurrence of the lesion or the presence of a residual aneurysm at last angiographic follow-up, as determined by the core laboratory, blinded to treatment allocation; 2. retreatment of the same aneurysm by endovascular or surgical means during the 18-month follow-up period; 3. an intracranial bleeding episode, or the occurrence or progression of a mass effect in relation to the treated aneurysm during the follow-up period, as determined by the blinded Adverse Event Committee.
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Mortality Rate
18 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
18 months
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events
18 months
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORplatinum coils
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORhydrogel coils
Interventions
standard endovascular coil embolization with or without adjunct techniques
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients presenting at least one aneurysm 'prone to recurrence after endovascular treatment' (PRET), defined for the sake of this study as:
- PRET-1: One ruptured or unruptured aneurysm, never treated, with a dimension ≥10mm (longest axis, including thrombosed portions of large or giant aneurysms); for ruptured lesions, patients should be in WFNS grade I, II or III.
- PRET-2: an Aneurysm presenting a major recurrence after previous coiling; and judged by the neurovascular team to require elective treatment.
- The anatomy of the lesion is such that endovascular treatment is possible with both types of coils (not necessarily certain or probable)
- The endovascular physician is content to use either type of coils (platinum or hydrogel-coated coils) but no other type of coils
- Patient is 18 or older
- Life expectancy is more than 2 years
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of other aneurysms requiring treatment during the same session
- Patients with associated cerebral arteriovenous malformations
- When parent vessel occlusion, without simultaneous endosaccular coiling of the aneurysm, is the primary intent of the procedure
- Any absolute contraindication to endovascular treatment, angiography, or anaesthesia such as severe allergies to contrast or medications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (32)
Shands - University of Florida Hospital
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Borgess Medical Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
Mayo Clinic Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
University of Mississipi Health Care
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216, United States
Saint Francis Medical Center
Cape Girardeau, Missouri, United States
Washington University in St Louis
St Louis, Missouri, United States
University of Buffalo (SUNY)
Buffalo, New York, United States
Stony Brook University Medical Center (SUNY)
Stony Brook, New York, United States
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, United States
University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
The Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
University of Virginia Health System
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
West Virginia University Hospital
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal - Notre Dame Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1, Canada
Instituto de Neurocirugía Dr. Asenjo
Santiago, Chile
CHU Bordeaux - Hôpital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, France
CHU Henri Mondor - Hôpital Henri Mondor
Créteil, France
CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Gui de Chauliac
Montpellier, France
CHU Nancy-Hôpital Central
Nancy, France
CHU de Nantes - Hôpital Guillaume et René Laennec
Nantes, France
Centre Hospitalier Sainte Anne
Paris, France
Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital
Kobe, Japan
Leeds General Infirmary
Leeds, United Kingdom
The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust
Liverpool, United Kingdom
Queens Medical Centre
Nottingham, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Naggara O, Darsaut T, Trystram D, Tselikas L, Raymond J. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: why we must not perpetuate the impasse for another 25 years. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jun;13(6):537-8. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70091-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 24849854DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Operators could not be blinded to coil type. This may have affected case selection, coil selection, and completeness of the coiling procedure. Aneurysm volumes were not directly measured but extrapolated from aneurysm dimensions.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ruby Klink, coordinator
- Organization
- Centre de Recherches du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jean RAYMOND, MD
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Daniel ROY, MD
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2008
First Posted
February 29, 2008
Study Start
June 1, 2007
Primary Completion
October 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 26, 2019
Results First Posted
March 1, 2019
Record last verified: 2016-07