NCT00621478

Brief Summary

Children with seizures are frequently seen in the emergency department. The drug lorazepam, which is commonly used, is not labeled by the US Food and Drug Administration for children for this use. The FDA, under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, has requested that a study comparing diazepam, a drug that is labeled by the FDA for this indication, with lorazepam be performed. The study will show whether one drug is more effective and safe than the other.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
259

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2008

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
2 countries

14 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2008

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 20, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 22, 2008

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

December 18, 2012

Status Verified

July 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

4.2 years

First QC Date

February 20, 2008

Last Update Submit

December 14, 2012

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • cessation of convulsions within 10 minutes of the initial administration of the study drug and a sustained absence of convulsions for 30 minutes from the initial administration of the study drug.

    30 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • To determine population pharmacokinetics (PK) of lorazepam using sparse sampling.

    24 hr

  • feasibility of identifying patients for informed consent prior to arrival in status epilepticus for a randomized controlled trial

    2 years

  • the experience of community consultation and public disclosure

    2 years

  • feasibility of enrolling pediatric patients under an exception from informed consent

    2 years

  • determine patients' and parents' attitudes and reactions to an exception from informed consent approach

    2 years

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Cohort 1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Cohort 1 (preconsented) patients will involve obtaining informed consent from the legally authorized representative of a potential study subject before they present to the ED in SE. Patient assent will be obtained for patients as per local IRB rules. The consent document (enclosed in this application) will inform parents that if their child comes to the ED and qualifies for the study based on study inclusion/exclusion criteria, they will be enrolled. Patients who cannot be contacted to confirm consent will be enrolled in Cohort 2 (EFIC) as detailed below. Patients in Cohort 1 will be randomized in a blinded fashion to either lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg or diazepam 0.2 mg/kg

Drug: lorazepam or diazepam

Cohort 2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Cohort 2 (EFIC) will include patients who appear in the ED with SE and qualify for the study but have not given prior consent. These patients will be enrolled under the EFIC regulations. The parent/guardian will be given the opportunity to object to participation or ask additional questions. The child will be enrolled (dosed) with study medication under an EFIC. Once the child is stabilized, a research staff member will approach the parent or LAR to obtain informed consent to continue the child's participation in the study. If a parent or LAR refuses continued participation, then no further study procedures will be performed. Safety and data will be collected in accordance with federal regulations. Cohort 2 will be randomized, like Cohort 1, to either lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg or diazepam 0.2 mg/kg

Drug: lorazepam or diazepam

Interventions

Administration instructions will ask to deliver 0.04 ml per kilogram of child's weight of the study medication up to a maximum of 1.6 ml. 0.04 ml/kg (maximum dose 1.6 ml) will deliver 0.1 mg/kg of lorazepam (maximum dose 4 mg) and 0.2 mg/kg of diazepam (maximum dose 8 mg). Half of this dose can be repeated in 5 minutes if the patient is still convulsing. The medication will be administered as a slow IV push.

Also known as: Ativan, Valium
Cohort 1Cohort 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age3 Months - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 3 months to less than 18 years;
  • Generalized tonic clonic status epilepticus, defined as:
  • Three or more generalized tonic clonic seizures within the last hour and currently experiencing a convulsion (i.e. the current convulsion may be the third convulsion within one hour); or
  • Two or more generalized tonic clonic seizures in succession with no recovery of consciousness between seizures and currently experiencing a convulsion (i.e. the current convulsion may be the second convulsion without recovery of consciousness after the first convulsion); or
  • A seizure that lasts at least 5 minutes that is either generalized tonic clonic in its entirety or starts focal and then generalizes. The seizure must be associated with loss of consciousness

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy;
  • Shock prior to study drug (sustained hypotension requiring inotropic therapy);
  • Significant dysrhythmia prior to study drug (other than sinus tachycardia);
  • Need for emergent surgical intervention and general anesthesia for a condition present prior to study drug;
  • Known sensitivity to benzodiazepines or known contraindication to benzodiazepine use; or
  • Use of a benzodiazepine within 1 week of presentation.
  • Pregnancy;
  • Use of a benzodiazepine within 1 week of presentation.
  • Parent/guardian refusal to give informed consent by the methods described;
  • Patient's refusal to assent (for patients ≥ 7 yrs old and mentally competent to understand study procedures) by the methods described, or as required by the local IRB;

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (14)

University of California- Davis Medical Center

Davis, California, 95817, United States

Location

Children's Hospital Colorado

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

Location

Children's National Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States

Location

University of Maryland Hospital for Children

Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States

Location

University of Michigan Emergency Medicine Research

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106, United States

Location

Children's Hospital of Michigan

Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States

Location

Children's Hospital of Buffalo

Buffalo, New York, 14222, United States

Location

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

Children's Medical Center Dallas

Dallas, Texas, 75390-9063, United States

Location

Texas Children's Hospital

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

University of Utah Pediatric Emergency Medicine

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84158, United States

Location

Medical College of Wisconsin Children's Corporate Center

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States

Location

Alberta Children's Hospital

Calgary, Alberta, T3B6A8, Canada

Location

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Ottawa, Ontario, K1H8L1, Canada

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Chamberlain DB, Chamberlain JM. Making Sense of a Negative Clinical Trial Result: A Bayesian Analysis of a Clinical Trial of Lorazepam and Diazepam for Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;69(1):117-124. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.08.449.

  • Chamberlain JM, Okada P, Holsti M, Mahajan P, Brown KM, Vance C, Gonzalez V, Lichenstein R, Stanley R, Brousseau DC, Grubenhoff J, Zemek R, Johnson DW, Clemons TE, Baren J; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Lorazepam vs diazepam for pediatric status epilepticus: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 Apr 23-30;311(16):1652-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2625.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Status Epilepticus

Interventions

LorazepamDiazepam

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

SeizuresNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BenzodiazepinonesBenzodiazepinesBenzazepinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • James Chamberlain, MD

    Children's National Research Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
NIH
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2008

First Posted

February 22, 2008

Study Start

February 1, 2008

Primary Completion

May 1, 2012

Study Completion

May 1, 2012

Last Updated

December 18, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-07

Locations