Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing Lorazepam and Diazepam for Children in the Emergency Department With Seizures (Status 2)
Use Of Lorazepam For The Treatment Of Pediatric Status Epilepticus: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Trial Of Lorazepam And Diazepam
2 other identifiers
interventional
259
2 countries
14
Brief Summary
Children with seizures are frequently seen in the emergency department. The drug lorazepam, which is commonly used, is not labeled by the US Food and Drug Administration for children for this use. The FDA, under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, has requested that a study comparing diazepam, a drug that is labeled by the FDA for this indication, with lorazepam be performed. The study will show whether one drug is more effective and safe than the other.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Feb 2008
Typical duration for phase_2
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 20, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedDecember 18, 2012
July 1, 2012
4.2 years
February 20, 2008
December 14, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
cessation of convulsions within 10 minutes of the initial administration of the study drug and a sustained absence of convulsions for 30 minutes from the initial administration of the study drug.
30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (6)
To determine population pharmacokinetics (PK) of lorazepam using sparse sampling.
24 hr
feasibility of identifying patients for informed consent prior to arrival in status epilepticus for a randomized controlled trial
2 years
the experience of community consultation and public disclosure
2 years
feasibility of enrolling pediatric patients under an exception from informed consent
2 years
determine patients' and parents' attitudes and reactions to an exception from informed consent approach
2 years
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cohort 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORCohort 1 (preconsented) patients will involve obtaining informed consent from the legally authorized representative of a potential study subject before they present to the ED in SE. Patient assent will be obtained for patients as per local IRB rules. The consent document (enclosed in this application) will inform parents that if their child comes to the ED and qualifies for the study based on study inclusion/exclusion criteria, they will be enrolled. Patients who cannot be contacted to confirm consent will be enrolled in Cohort 2 (EFIC) as detailed below. Patients in Cohort 1 will be randomized in a blinded fashion to either lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg or diazepam 0.2 mg/kg
Cohort 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORCohort 2 (EFIC) will include patients who appear in the ED with SE and qualify for the study but have not given prior consent. These patients will be enrolled under the EFIC regulations. The parent/guardian will be given the opportunity to object to participation or ask additional questions. The child will be enrolled (dosed) with study medication under an EFIC. Once the child is stabilized, a research staff member will approach the parent or LAR to obtain informed consent to continue the child's participation in the study. If a parent or LAR refuses continued participation, then no further study procedures will be performed. Safety and data will be collected in accordance with federal regulations. Cohort 2 will be randomized, like Cohort 1, to either lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg or diazepam 0.2 mg/kg
Interventions
Administration instructions will ask to deliver 0.04 ml per kilogram of child's weight of the study medication up to a maximum of 1.6 ml. 0.04 ml/kg (maximum dose 1.6 ml) will deliver 0.1 mg/kg of lorazepam (maximum dose 4 mg) and 0.2 mg/kg of diazepam (maximum dose 8 mg). Half of this dose can be repeated in 5 minutes if the patient is still convulsing. The medication will be administered as a slow IV push.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 3 months to less than 18 years;
- Generalized tonic clonic status epilepticus, defined as:
- Three or more generalized tonic clonic seizures within the last hour and currently experiencing a convulsion (i.e. the current convulsion may be the third convulsion within one hour); or
- Two or more generalized tonic clonic seizures in succession with no recovery of consciousness between seizures and currently experiencing a convulsion (i.e. the current convulsion may be the second convulsion without recovery of consciousness after the first convulsion); or
- A seizure that lasts at least 5 minutes that is either generalized tonic clonic in its entirety or starts focal and then generalizes. The seizure must be associated with loss of consciousness
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy;
- Shock prior to study drug (sustained hypotension requiring inotropic therapy);
- Significant dysrhythmia prior to study drug (other than sinus tachycardia);
- Need for emergent surgical intervention and general anesthesia for a condition present prior to study drug;
- Known sensitivity to benzodiazepines or known contraindication to benzodiazepine use; or
- Use of a benzodiazepine within 1 week of presentation.
- Pregnancy;
- Use of a benzodiazepine within 1 week of presentation.
- Parent/guardian refusal to give informed consent by the methods described;
- Patient's refusal to assent (for patients ≥ 7 yrs old and mentally competent to understand study procedures) by the methods described, or as required by the local IRB;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (14)
University of California- Davis Medical Center
Davis, California, 95817, United States
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Children's National Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
University of Maryland Hospital for Children
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
University of Michigan Emergency Medicine Research
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106, United States
Children's Hospital of Michigan
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
Children's Hospital of Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, 14222, United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Children's Medical Center Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75390-9063, United States
Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
University of Utah Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84158, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin Children's Corporate Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Alberta Children's Hospital
Calgary, Alberta, T3B6A8, Canada
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H8L1, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Chamberlain DB, Chamberlain JM. Making Sense of a Negative Clinical Trial Result: A Bayesian Analysis of a Clinical Trial of Lorazepam and Diazepam for Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;69(1):117-124. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.08.449.
PMID: 27993298DERIVEDChamberlain JM, Okada P, Holsti M, Mahajan P, Brown KM, Vance C, Gonzalez V, Lichenstein R, Stanley R, Brousseau DC, Grubenhoff J, Zemek R, Johnson DW, Clemons TE, Baren J; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Lorazepam vs diazepam for pediatric status epilepticus: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 Apr 23-30;311(16):1652-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2625.
PMID: 24756515DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James Chamberlain, MD
Children's National Research Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 20, 2008
First Posted
February 22, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion
May 1, 2012
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
December 18, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-07