A Clinical Study in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain From PHN Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Gabapentin Treatment
Study PXN110527: The Investigation of the Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of XP13512 in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain Associated With Post-herpetic Neuralgia (PHN) Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Gabapentin Treatment.
1 other identifier
interventional
96
2 countries
53
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is evaluate the difference between two doses of gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, on pain associated with post-herpetic neuralgia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Mar 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
53 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 18, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 20, 2011
CompletedJuly 22, 2013
January 1, 2013
1.3 years
February 6, 2008
April 26, 2011
July 15, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Data
Baseline and end of treatment values are the calculated means of the daily 24-hour API scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (baseline) and the last 7 days on treatment within each period (end of treatment). Participants rated their API over the preceding 24 hours, using an 11-point PI-Numerical Rating Scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). LOCF was used if less than 4 days of diary data were provided. Change from baseline was calculated as end of treatment minus baseline. Data are summarized by dose, independent of treatment period.
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Change From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data for Each Treatment Period
Baseline and end of treatment values are the calculated means of the daily 24-hour API scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (baseline) and the last 7 days on treatment within each period (end of treatment). Participants used a hand-held diary to rate their average pain intensity over the preceding 24 hours, using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). LOCF was used if less than 4 days of diary data were provided. The by period summary is provided as a sensitivity analysis for the primary analysis.
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Change From Baseline in the Mean Current (Evening) Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF Data
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of Each Treatment Period Using LOCF
Baseline and End of Treatment (Weeks 4 and 9, representing the last week of each treatment period)
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
GEn 1200mg/day
EXPERIMENTALgabapentin enacarbil 1200mg/day, 4 weeks treatment in either the first or second treatment period
GEn 3600mg/day
EXPERIMENTALgabapentin enacarbil 3600mg/day, 4 weeks treatment in either the first or second treatment period
Interventions
1200mg/day gabapentin enacarbil
3600mg/day gabapentin enacarbil
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or older
- Documented medical diagnosis of PHN with pain present for at least 3 months from the healing of a herpes zoster rash
- Female subjects are eligible if of non-childbearing potential or not lactating, has a negative pregnancy, and agrees to use one a specified highly effective method for avoiding pregnancy.
- Currently on a stable dose of 1800 mg/day of gabapentin for ≥2 weeks with inadequate response OR
- Not currently treated with gabapentin, but previously treated with ≥1800 mg/day of gabapentin for 4 weeks or more with inadequate response.
- Baseline 24-hour average pain intensity score ≥ 4.0 based on an 11-point PI-NRS
- Provides written informed consent in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements
You may not qualify if:
- Other chronic pain conditions not associated with PHN. However, the subject will not be excluded if:
- The pain is located at a different region of the body; and
- The pain intensity is not greater than the pain intensity of the PHN; and
- The subject can assess PHN pain independently of other pain
- Is unable to discontinue prohibited medications or non-drug therapies or procedures throughout the duration of the study
- Hepatic impairment defined as ALT or AST \> 2x upper limit of normal (ULN), or alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin \> 1.5x ULN
- Chronic hepatitis B or C
- Impaired renal function defined as creatinine clearance \<60 mL/min or requiring hemodialysis
- Corrected QT (QTc) interval ≥ 450 msec or QTc interval ≥480 msec for patients with Bundle Branch Block
- Uncontrolled hypertension at screen (sitting systolic \>160 mmHg and/or sitting diastolic \>90 mmHg)
- Current diagnosis of active epilepsy or any active seizure disorder requiring chronic therapy with antiepileptic drugs
- Medical condition or disorder that would interfere with the action, absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of GEn, or, in the investigator's judgment
- Is considered to be clinically significant and may pose a safety concern, or,
- Could interfere with the accurate assessment of safety or efficacy, or,
- Could potentially affect a subject's safety or study outcome
- +11 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- XenoPort, Inc.lead
Study Sites (53)
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Oxnard, California, 93030, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Roseville, California, 95661, United States
GSK Investigational Site
San Francisco, California, 94109, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Bradenton, Florida, 34209, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Chipley, Florida, 32428, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Daytona Beach, Florida, 32117, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Myers, Florida, 33916, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Gainesville, Florida, 32608, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Marianna, Florida, 32446, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Miami Springs, Florida, 33166, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Naranja, Florida, 33032, United States
GSK Investigational Site
South Miami, Florida, 33143, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33603, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Decatur, Georgia, 30033, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60617, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Terre Haute, Indiana, 47802, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111, United States
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63117, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Missoula, Montana, 59808, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03766, United States
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10004, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Norman, Oklahoma, 73071, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Medford, Oregon, 97501, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Greensburg, Pennsylvania, 15601, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78756, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77028, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77044, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77089, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Longview, Texas, 75605, United States
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78238, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Weber City, Virginia, 24290, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tacoma, Washington, 98405, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Yakima, Washington, 98902, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Schönau, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69250, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Hüttenberg, Hesse, 35625, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Wiesbaden, Hesse, 65189, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Achim, Lower Saxony, 28832, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44892, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Hattingen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45525, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55116, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Dresden, Saxony, 01307, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Leipzg, Saxony, 04109, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, State of Berlin, 10409, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, State of Berlin, 10435, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Harden RN, Freeman R, Rainka M, Zhang L, Bell C, Berges A, Chen C, Graff O, Harding K, Hunter S, Kavanagh S, Schwartzbach C, Warren S, McClung C. A phase 2a, randomized, crossover trial of gabapentin enacarbil for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia in gabapentin inadequate responders. Pain Med. 2013 Dec;14(12):1918-32. doi: 10.1111/pme.12227. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
PMID: 24102928DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- XenoPort Call Center
- Organization
- XenoPort, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2008
First Posted
February 18, 2008
Study Start
March 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2009
Study Completion
July 1, 2009
Last Updated
July 22, 2013
Results First Posted
May 20, 2011
Record last verified: 2013-01