A Safety and Efficacy Study of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System
BHR
Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System (BHR) Post Approval Study: A Prospective, Multi-Centered Study of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System
1 other identifier
observational
329
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to meet a PMA condition of approval of the BHR System. The study will evaluate the long term safety and effectiveness of the BHR system in patients with non-inflammatory and inflammatory arthritis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2006
Longer than P75 for all trials
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 6, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 28, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 12, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 12, 2025
CompletedApril 15, 2026
December 1, 2024
18.6 years
January 28, 2008
April 10, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of Participants with Revision by 10 Years
Proportion of participants with revision by 10 years. A revision was defined as removal with or without replacement of the components (device revision may have been partial or total).
10 years
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Harris Hip Score (HHS): Overall Score
Baseline, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 10 years
Harris Hip Score (HHS): Pain Score
Baseline, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 10 years
Harris Hip Score (HHS): Function Score
Baseline, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 10 years
Harris Hip Score (HHS): Absence of Deformity Score
Baseline, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 10 years
Harris Hip Score (HHS): Range of Motion Score
Baseline, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 10 years
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Hip Resurfacing
Birmingham Hip Resurfacing
Interventions
Hip resurfacing system: single use device for hybrid fixation in patients requiring primary hip resurfacing arthroplasty
Eligibility Criteria
The BHR System is a single use device intended for hybrid fixation: cemented femoral head component and cementless acetabular component. The BHR System is intended for use in patients requiring primary hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to: * Non-inflammatory arthritis (degenerative joint disease) such as osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis, or dysplasia/DDH, or * Inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis. BHR System is intended for patients who, due to relatively younger age or increase activity level, may not be suitable for traditional total hip arthroplasty due to an increase possibility of requiring future ipsilateral hip joint revision.
You may qualify if:
- A. Males or females, at least 21 years of age, inclusive, and skeletally mature.
- B. The BHR System is a single use device intended for hybrid fixation: cemented femoral head component and cementless acetabular component. The BHR System is intended for use in patients requiring primary hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to:
- non-inflammatory arthritis (degenerative joint disease) such as osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis, or dysplasia/DDH, or
- inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis.
- The BHR System is intended for patients who, due to their relatively younger age or increased activity level, may not be suitable for traditional total hip arthroplasty due to an increased possibility of requiring future ipsilateral hip joint revision.
- C. The subject or his/her legal guardian was willing to consent to participate in the study by signing and dating the approved consent form;
- D. The subject was available for clinical follow-up through at least ten years postoperative;
You may not qualify if:
- A. Subjects with infection or sepsis,
- B. Subjects with any vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, or neuromuscular disease severe enough to compromise implant stability or postoperative recovery,
- C. Female subjects of child-bearing age due to unknown effect on the fetus of medal ion release.
- D. Subjects with bone stock inadequate to support the device including:
- Subjects with severe osteopenia should not receive a BHR procedure. Patients with a family history of severe osteoporosis or sever osteopenia.
- Subjects with osteonecrosis or avascular necrosis (AVN) with \>50% involvement of the femoral head (regardless of FICAT Grade) should not receive a BHR.
- Note: In cases of questionable bone stock, a DEXA scan may be necessary to assess inadequate bone stock.
- E. Subjects with known moderate to severe renal insufficiency. Subjects on medications (such as high-dose or chronic aminoglycoside treatment) or with co-morbidities (such as diabetes) that increase the risk of future, significant renal impairment should be advised of the possibility of increase in system medal ion concentration. Preoperative and postoperative monitoring of renal function 9such creatinine, GFR, BUN) at 6wk/3month, 6 month (optional visit), 1-, 2-, 3-, 4,-, 5-, and 10-year time points was necessary.
- F. Patients who were immunosuppressed with disease such as AIDS or persons receiving high dose of corticosteroids.
- G. Patients with psychological or neurological conditions which would pre-empt their ability or unwillingness to participate in the study.
- H. Patients who were severely overweight.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
Tucson Orthopaedic Institute
Tucson, Arizona, 85713, United States
Center for Orthopaedics
Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70601, United States
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021, United States
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14672, United States
OrthoCarolina
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States
Anderson Orthopaedic Clinic
Alexandria, Virginia, 22306, United States
Aurora Medical Center
Grafton, Wisconsin, 53024, United States
Biospecimen
laboratory collection: whole blood, serum
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andy Engh, MD
Anderson Orthopaedic Clinic
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lawrence Housman, MD
Tucson Orthopaedic Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Masonis, MD
OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edwin Su, MD
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Noble, Jr., MD
Center for Orthopaedics
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Anderson, MD
Aurora Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher Drinkwater, MD
University of Rochester
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2008
First Posted
February 11, 2008
Study Start
October 6, 2006
Primary Completion
May 12, 2025
Study Completion
May 12, 2025
Last Updated
April 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2024-12