Assess Safety and Probable Benefit of the EXCOR® Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device
A Prospective, Multi-center, Single Arm Study to Access the Safety and Probable Benefit of the Berlin Heart EXCOR® Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device [EXCOR Pediatric]
1 other identifier
interventional
48
2 countries
17
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine whether use of the Berlin Heart EXCOR® Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device for bridge-to-transplant is associated with a reasonable assurance of safety and probable benefit such that the EXCOR® Pediatric merits approval by the Food and Drug Administration under a Humanitarian Device Exception (HDE).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable heart-failure
Started May 2007
Longer than P75 for not_applicable heart-failure
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 20, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 15, 2013
CompletedMarch 15, 2013
March 1, 2013
3.3 years
December 20, 2007
January 25, 2012
March 13, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The Safety of EXCOR® Pediatric Was Evaluated by Summarizing the Serious Adverse Event Rate Experienced While the Subject Was Supported on the Device.
The serious adverse event rate was calculated by totaling the number of serious adverse events all subjects experienced during device support (from implant to explant, an average of 58 days) divided by the total support time (in days) for all subjects. The serious adverse event rates were calculated separately for each primary study cohort.
Participants were followed while on device support, an average of 58 days
Efficacy of the EXCOR® Pediatric Was Estimated by Showing Survival of All Participants Who Were Supported by the Device.
Efficacy of the EXCOR® Pediatric was estimated by showing survival of all participants who were supported by the device.
Participants were followed while on device support, an average of 58 days
Study Arms (1)
EXCOR Pediatric
EXPERIMENTALImplantation of the EXCOR Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device
Interventions
Extracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Severe New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class IV (or Ross Functional Class IV for patients \<= 6 years) heart failure refractory to optimal medical therapy, and has met at least one of the following criteria:
- Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) profile status 1 or 1a, i.e. critical cardiogenic shock (low BP unresponsive to support), compromised end organ perfusion, \< 24 hour survival without mechanical support; may be due to Ventricular Tachycardia (VT)/Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) (1A) OR
- INTERMACS profile status or 2A (i.e progressive decline): not in imminent danger, but worsening despite optimal inotropic therapy; may be due to VT/VF (2A) AND at least one of the following criteria: Decline in renal functions, Decline in nutritional status, Decline in mobility/ambulation
- Support with extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or other mechanical circulatory support device OR
- Unable to separate from cardiopulmonary bypass
- Listed (UNOS status 1A or equivalent) for cardiac transplantation
- Two-ventricle circulation, including cardiomypathy, repaired structural heart disease or acquired heart disease
- Age 0 to 16 years
- Weight \>= 3 kg and \<= 60 kg
- Legal guardian (and patient if age-appropriate) understands the nature of the procedure, is willing to comply with associated follow-up evaluations, and provide written informed consent and assent prior to the procedure
You may not qualify if:
- Support on ECMO for \>= 10 days
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) duration \>= 30 minutes within 48 hours of implantation
- Body weight \< 3.0 kg or Body Surface Area \> 1.5 m2
- Presence of mechanical aortic valve
- Unfavorable or technically-challenging cardiac anatomy including single ventricle lesions, complex heterotaxy, and restrictive cardiomyopathy
- Evidence of intrinsic hepatic disease
- Evidence of intrinsic renal disease
- Evidence of intrinsic pulmonary disease
- Hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis (not including dialysis or continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) for fluid removal)
- Moderate or severe aortic and/or pulmonic valve insufficiency
- Apical Ventricular Septal Defects (VSD) or other compromise that is technically challenging to repair at implant
- Documented heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
- Documented coagulopathy
- Hematologic disorder
- Active Infection within 48 hours of implant (positive blood culture or White Blood Cell Count \>15,000 and fever \> 38 degrees C)
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (17)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202, United States
Lucille Packard Children's Hospital / Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
The Children's Hospital Denver
Denver, Colorado, 80045, United States
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Riley Hospital for Children
Indianapolis, Indiana, 26202, United States
Children's Hospital of Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
C.S. Mott Children's Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
University of Minnesota - Fairview
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
St. Louis Children's Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
The Mt. Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224, United States
Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Seattle Children's Hospital
Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Stollery Children's Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada
Related Publications (3)
Jordan LC, Ichord RN, Reinhartz O, Humpl T, Pruthi S, Tjossem C, Rosenthal DN. Neurological complications and outcomes in the Berlin Heart EXCOR(R) pediatric investigational device exemption trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jan 22;4(1):e001429. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001429.
PMID: 25613996DERIVEDFraser CD Jr, Jaquiss RD, Rosenthal DN, Humpl T, Canter CE, Blackstone EH, Naftel DC, Ichord RN, Bomgaars L, Tweddell JS, Massicotte MP, Turrentine MW, Cohen GA, Devaney EJ, Pearce FB, Carberry KE, Kroslowitz R, Almond CS; Berlin Heart Study Investigators. Prospective trial of a pediatric ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 9;367(6):532-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014164.
PMID: 22873533DERIVEDAlmond CS, Buchholz H, Massicotte P, Ichord R, Rosenthal DN, Uzark K, Jaquiss RD, Kroslowitz R, Kepler MB, Lobbestael A, Bellinger D, Blume ED, Fraser CD Jr, Bartlett RH, Thiagarajan R, Jenkins K. Berlin Heart EXCOR Pediatric ventricular assist device Investigational Device Exemption study: study design and rationale. Am Heart J. 2011 Sep;162(3):425-35.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.05.026. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
PMID: 21884857DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Robert Kroslowitz, CEO
- Organization
- Berlin Heart Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charles D Fraser, MD, FACS
Texas Children's Hospital / Baylor College of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
- Expanded Access
- Yes
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 20, 2007
First Posted
December 31, 2007
Study Start
May 1, 2007
Primary Completion
September 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
March 15, 2013
Results First Posted
March 15, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-03