Study to Evaluate if Inhaled Nitric Oxide Improves Liver Function After Transplantation
Effects of Inhaled Nitric Oxide on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Human Liver During Transplantation
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This blinded, placebo-controlled study will administer inhaled nitric oxide to patients undergoing liver transplantation. The purpose of the study is to test if inhaled nitric oxide prevents liver injury associated with the restoration of blood flow. The premise of the current study is provided by previous studies which document a protective effect of inhaled nitric oxide in this clinical setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Apr 2008
Typical duration for phase_2
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 20, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 28, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 6, 2014
CompletedNovember 6, 2014
October 1, 2014
11 months
December 20, 2007
September 30, 2013
November 5, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Changed Rate of Liver Function Recovery Post-transplantation (Percent Change in AST Levels)
The faster the percent decrease of AST reflect the greater the treatment improved liver function post transplant. A positive percent reflects an decrease; a negative percentage reflects a increase. The rate was calculated by measuring AST levels at baseline and at 96 hours post baseline. (AST levels were lower at 96 hours relative to baseline- positive values in data table indicate percent decrease of AST relative to baseline).
baseline and 96 hours after baseline
Changed Rate of Liver Function Recovery Post-transplantation (Percent Change in ALT Levels)
The faster the percent decrease ALT reflect, the greater the treatment improved liver function post transplant. A positive percent reflects an decrease; a negative percentage reflects a increase. . (ALT levels were lower at 96 hours relative to baseline- positive values in data table indicate percent decrease of ALT relative to baseline).
baseline and 96 hours after baseline
Change in Rate of Liver Function Recovery Post-transplantation (Percent Change in Alkaline Phosphatase Levels)
The faster the percent increase of alkaline phosphatase reflect, the greater the treatment improved liver function post transplant. A positive percent reflects an increase; a negative percentage reflects a decrease.
baseline and 96 hours after baseline
Change in Rate of Liver Function Recovery Post-transplantation (Percent Change in Prothrombin Times (PT))
The faster the percent increase of PT reflect, the greater the treatment improved liver function post transplant. A positive percent reflects an decrease; a negative percentage reflects a increase.
baseline and 96 hours after baseline
Change in Rate of Liver Function Recovery Post-transplantation (Percent Change in Bilirubin Levels)
A positive percent reflects an decrease; a negative percentage reflects a increase.
baseline and 96 hours after baseline
Change in Rate of Liver Function Recovery Post-transplantation (Decrease in Hepatobiliary Complications)
Number of complications due to hepatobiliary events.
baseline to 9 months after transplantation
Number of Complications Related to Liver Function Recovery Post-transplantation (Total Complications) at 9 Months Post Surgery
Number of any complication reported by subjects at 9 months after surgery
baseline to 9 months post surgery
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Effect of iNO on Hosptial Length of Stay
from surgery through discharge from hospital
Effect of iNO on SICU Stay
baseline to discharge for SICU
Study Arms (2)
1. Experimental
EXPERIMENTALiNO administration
2. Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo (nitrogen)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients \> 19 yr of age scheduled to undergo liver transplantation.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients \< 19 yr of age
- Patients undergoing re-transplantation or dual organ transplantation
- Patients with underlying pulmonary complications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Alabama at Birminghamlead
- Mallinckrodtcollaborator
- University of Washingtoncollaborator
Study Sites (2)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195-6540, United States
Related Publications (2)
Lang JD Jr, Teng X, Chumley P, Crawford JH, Isbell TS, Chacko BK, Liu Y, Jhala N, Crowe DR, Smith AB, Cross RC, Frenette L, Kelley EE, Wilhite DW, Hall CR, Page GP, Fallon MB, Bynon JS, Eckhoff DE, Patel RP. Inhaled NO accelerates restoration of liver function in adults following orthotopic liver transplantation. J Clin Invest. 2007 Sep;117(9):2583-91. doi: 10.1172/JCI31892.
PMID: 17717604BACKGROUNDLang JD Jr, Smith AB, Brandon A, Bradley KM, Liu Y, Li W, Crowe DR, Jhala NC, Cross RC, Frenette L, Martay K, Vater YL, Vitin AA, Dembo GA, Dubay DA, Bynon JS, Szychowski JM, Reyes JD, Halldorson JB, Rayhill SC, Dick AA, Bakthavatsalam R, Brandenberger J, Broeckel-Elrod JA, Sissons-Ross L, Jordan T, Chen LY, Siriussawakul A, Eckhoff DE, Patel RP. A randomized clinical trial testing the anti-inflammatory effects of preemptive inhaled nitric oxide in human liver transplantation. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 12;9(2):e86053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086053. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24533048DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Rakesh Patel
- Organization
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rakesh P Patel, PhD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Keith A Jones, MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Devin E Eckhoff, MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
- STUDY DIRECTOR
John S Bynon, MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Blair Smith, MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
- STUDY CHAIR
Clark Cross, MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Luc Frenette, MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John D Lang, MD
University of Washington
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 20, 2007
First Posted
December 28, 2007
Study Start
April 1, 2008
Primary Completion
March 1, 2009
Study Completion
October 1, 2012
Last Updated
November 6, 2014
Results First Posted
November 6, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-10