NCT00575666

Brief Summary

This study is an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intranasal insulin as an adjunctive therapy, with a 4-week follow-up, in 60 non-diabetic schizophrenia subjects to examine insulin's effect on psychopathology and cognition. In addition, the study will examine insulin's effects on weight, food intake, resting energy expenditure, and body composition.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 schizophrenia

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2007

Typical duration for phase_4 schizophrenia

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2007

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 14, 2007

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 18, 2007

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2010

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 17, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

December 17, 2012

Status Verified

November 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

December 14, 2007

Results QC Date

April 27, 2012

Last Update Submit

November 15, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

cognition, psychopathology

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (17)

  • Cognitive Function- Digit Span Total

    Subjects completed the digit span task. Assessment was completed at Screening/Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. Higher scores represent higher recall accuracy, and therefore less advanced psychopathology. Min score= 0, Max score= 30. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

  • Cognitive Function- Verbal Fluency

    Subjects completed a verbal fluency test. Assessment was completed at Screening/Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. Higher scores represent higher levels of verbal fluency, and therefore less advanced psychopathology. Min score= 0, Max score= N/A. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

  • Cognitive Function- HVLT Immediate Recall Total

    Subjects completed a word recall task. Assessment was completed at Screening/Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. Higher scores represent higher recall accuracy, and therefore less advanced psychopathology. Min score= 0, Max score= 36. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

  • Cognitive Function- HVLT Delayed Recall Total

    Subjects completed a delayed word recall task. Assessments were completed at Screening/Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. Higher scores represent higher recall accuracy, and therefore less advanced psychopathology. Min score= 0, Max score= 12. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

  • Cognitive Function- Trails A

    Subjects completed a timed "trails" (i.e. connect-the-dots) test. Assessments were completed at Screening/Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. Scores were measured by time to complete in seconds. Max score= N/A. Lower values represent less advanced psychopathology. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

  • Cognitive Function- Trails B

    Subjects completed a timed "trails" (i.e. connect the dots) test. Assessments were completed at Screening/Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. Scores were mesured by time to complete in seconds. Max score= N/A. Lower values represent less advanced psychopathology. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

  • Cognitive Function- CPT D Prime Score

    Subjects completed a computer-based cognitive test designed to measure sustained attention (attention to a specific stimulus over a period of several minutes) before and after intranasal treatment. During this test, participants respond as quickly as possible to any consecutive presentation of identical stimuli on the computer screen. The stimuli (2, 3, and 4-digit targets) were presented with increasing cognitive load in successive blocks. Correct responses, responses made to the second of 2 identical stimuli presented in a row, were scored as hits. False alarms were also recorded. The "d prime score" is a score given to each participant on a scale of 0.0- 1.0 in which discrimination sensitivity is measured. A score of zero equates to no sensitivity, whereas a score of 1.0 equates to perfect sensitivity. Values below represent postreatment performance minus pretreatment performance. Higher scores represent less advanced psychopathology. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

  • Cognitive Function- CPT Hits Rate (Proportion)

    Subjects completed a computer-based cognitive test. The test is described in detail in a previous outcome measure ("CPT d prime score"). Hits rate was defined as the proportion of correct responses to the relevant stimuli (response to two identical targets) compared to total responses (total hits). Assessments were completed at Screening/Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. Hits rate as a proportion of total hits was measured. Min score= 0, Max score= 1.0. Higher values represent higher stimulus recognition accuracy, and thus less advanced psychopathology. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

  • Cognitive Function- CPT Reaction Time of Hits (Milliseconds)

    Subjects completed a computer-based cognitive functioning test designed to measure sustained attention (attention to a stimulus over a period of several minutes). The test is described in detail in a previous outcome measure ("CPT d prime score"). Reaction time of hits is defined as the average time each participant took to respond correctly to relevant stimuli. Assessments were completed at Screening/Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. Reaction time was measured in milliseconds. Max score= N/A. Lower values represent less advanced psychopathology. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

  • Cognitive Function- CPT False-alarm Rate (Proportion)

    Subjects completed a computer-based cognitive functioning test designed to measure sustained attention (attention to a stimulus over a period of several minutes). False alarm rate is defined as the proportion of overall hits that were in response to an incorrect stimulus (two consecutive non-identical targets). Assessments were completed at Screening/Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. False-alarm hits were measured as a proportion of total hits. Min score= 0, Max score= 1.0. Lower values represent higher hit accuracy and less advanced psychopathology. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

  • Psychopathology- PANSS Total

    Positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and general psychopatholgy of schizophrenia were measured at Screening/Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. The assessment consisted of 30 total items, with each item measured on a seven-point scale (1= absent, 4= moderate, 7= extreme). Min score= 30, Max score= 210. Higher scores represent more advanced psychopathology. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

  • Psychopathology- PANSS Positive

    Positive symptoms of schizophrenia were measured at Screening/Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. The assessment consisted of seven items, with each item measured on a seven-point scale (1= absent, 4= moderate, 7= extreme). Min score= 7, Max score= 49. Higher scores represent more advanced psychopathology. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

  • Psychopathology- PANSS Negative

    Negative symptoms of schizophrenia were measured at Screening/Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. Assessment consisted of seven-items, with each item measured on a seven-point scale (1= absent, 4= moderate, 7= extreme). Min score= 7, Max score= 49. Higher scores represent more advanced psychopathology. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

  • Psychopathology- PANSS General Psychopathology

    General psychopathology was measured at Screening/Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. The assessment consisted of 16 items, with each item measured on a seven-point scale (1= absent, 4= moderate, 7= extreme). Min score= 16, Max score= 112. Higher scores represent more advanced psychopathology. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

  • Psychopathology- SANS Total

    Negative symptoms of schizophrenia were measured at Screening/Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. Assessment consisted of 25 items, with each item measured on a six-point scale (0= none, 3= moderate, 5= severe). Min score= 0, Max score= 125. Higher scores represent more advanced psychopathology. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

  • Psychopathology- CDSS Total

    Symptoms of depression were measured at Screening/Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. Assessment consisted of 9 items, with each item measured on a four-point scale (0= absent, 3= severe). Min score= 0, Max score= 27. Higher scores represent more advanced psychopathology. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

  • Psychopathology- QLS Total

    Quality of life was measured at Screening/Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. Assessment consisted of 21 items, with each item measured on a seven-point scale (0= not present, 3= sometimes present, 6= always present). Min score= 0, Max score= 126. Higher scores represent lower quality of life. Week 8 values are displayed below.

    Week 8

Study Arms (2)

A

EXPERIMENTAL

Intranasal Insulin Treatment

Drug: Insulin or Placebo

B

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Drug: Placebo

Drug: Insulin or Placebo

Interventions

intranasal, 40IU, 4 times daily

AB

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18-65 years.
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia, any subtype or schizoaffective disorder, any subtype.
  • Stable dose of the current antipsychotic drug for at least one month.
  • Well established compliance with outpatient treatment per treating clinician's judgement.
  • Able to complete the cognitive assessment battery (must be English speaking).
  • Female subjects will be eligible to participate in the study if they are of non-childbearing potential or of child-bearing potential and willing to practice appropriate birth control methods (complete abstinence from sexual intercourse, female sterilization, sterilization of male partner, implants of levonorgestrel, injectable progestogen, oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, or double barrier methods of contraception using spermicide with either a condom or diaphragm) during the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to provide informed consent.
  • Current substance abuse.
  • Psychiatrically unstable per treating clinician's judgement.
  • Significant medical illnesses including uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes, seizure. disorder, severe cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, pulmonary, or thyroid diseases.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Massachusetts Medical School

Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Interventions

Insulin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProinsulinInsulinsPancreatic HormonesPeptide HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Results Point of Contact

Title
Xiaoduo Fan, MD, MPH, MS
Organization
UMass Medical School

Study Officials

  • Xiaoduo Fan, MD, MPH, MS

    UMass Medical School

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2007

First Posted

December 18, 2007

Study Start

December 1, 2007

Primary Completion

September 1, 2010

Study Completion

September 1, 2010

Last Updated

December 17, 2012

Results First Posted

December 17, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-11

Locations