A Cafeteria Based Study of Weight Gain Prevention
Cafeteria
2 other identifiers
interventional
106
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The dramatic rise in overweight and obesity during the past several decades can be explained by environmental changes that foster increased energy intake and decreased energy expenditure. There are several reasons to suggest that the most effective approach to weight gain prevention is the incorporate reduced-fat eating into an overall strategy of lowering the energy density of the diet. Our energy density manipulations will be designed to reduce both the fat content and the caloric density of foods served at a cafeteria, which serves as the "food environment" for hospital employees.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable obesity
Started Sep 2002
Longer than P75 for not_applicable obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2002
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 12, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2007
CompletedFebruary 25, 2010
February 1, 2010
December 12, 2007
February 24, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Weight
36 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Caloric and macro-nutrient intake
36 months
Study Arms (2)
control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl (only exposure to the food labels and the new lower ED foods).
intervention group
EXPERIMENTALEducation in REDE techniques plus exposure to the food labels and the new lower ED foods.
Interventions
The intervention group received the education in REDE techniques. The intervention in this study comprised four components: * Four group education sessions to introduce the REDE principles of eating; * Approximately 10 new lower energy-dense foods were introduced in the employee cafeteria daily at lunchtime; * Food labels for all foods sold in the employee cafeteria at lunch time, which provided the energy density, calories, and macronutrient content of the prepared cafeteria foods. Prior to the intervention almost no foods had food labels. * Price reductions for lower energy density items. Both groups were exposed to the food labels and the new lower ED foods, but only the intervention group received the education sessions about how to take advantage of the new labels and cafeteria foods and only they were eligible for the price reductions.
The control group received no REDE intervention at all. Both groups were exposed to the food labels and the new lower ED foods, but the control group did not receive the education sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- works at one of the two hospitals and eats lunch in the cafeteria 2x per week
- BMI between 23 and 25
You may not qualify if:
- current diagnosis of a chronic disease or condition known to affect appetite or body weight
- currently taking medication known to affect appetite or body weight
- current pregnancy or plans to become pregnant within the next 24 months
- current enrollment or plans to enroll within the next 24 months in an organized weight management program
- plans to terminate employment at the hospital within the next 12 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Local Hospitals
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael R Lowe, Ph.D.
Drexel University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 12, 2007
First Posted
December 14, 2007
Study Start
September 1, 2002
Study Completion
February 1, 2007
Last Updated
February 25, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-02