NCT00572039

Brief Summary

This randomized, controlled clinical trial will test the efficacy of Problem-Solving Treatment (PST) to improve vision function in older persons with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). AMD is a highly prevalent, disabling disease of aging that causes severe vision loss and functional decline. It is the leading cause of blindness in older persons in the United States and may affect more than 10 million people. Currently, there are no effective treatments to restore vision. Thus, improving Vision Function is a major goal of treatment. Vision function refers to vision-related abilities to perform daily living activities (e.g. reading recipes to prepare meals). Decrements in vision function will become a major public health problem as the population ages and the prevalence of AMD increases. PST is a brief, standardized, cognitive-behavioral treatment that teaches problem-solving skills. We believe PST will enable patients with AMD find practical solutions to vision-related problems and thereby improve vision function. We will recruit 240 AMD patients from the retina clinics of Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA, with bilateral AMD and visual acuity worse than 20/70 in the better eye. PST-trained therapists will deliver 6 1-hour, in-home sessions to the 120 subjects randomized to PST. The control treatment is Supportive Therapy (ST), a similarly structured, standardized psychological treatment that controls for the non-specific effects of treatment (n=120). ST contains no active elements beyond its non-specific components; in this way it is a placebo treatment. Independent raters, masked to treatment assignment, will assess Targeted Vision Function (primary outcome) and vision-related quality of life (secondary outcome) at 3 months to assess PST's efficacy, and at 6 months to evaluate its long-term effects. As the population ages, the disability of AMD will become more prevalent, costly, and burdensome to patients, families, and ophthalmologists. This makes devising and testing practical and affordable interventions to improve vision function a national priority.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
241

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2005

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2005

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 10, 2007

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 12, 2007

Completed
5.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2013

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 15, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

April 15, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7.8 years

First QC Date

December 10, 2007

Results QC Date

August 11, 2015

Last Update Submit

April 11, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Age-Related Macular DegenerationAMDVision FunctionProblem Solving TreatmentPST

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Targeted Vision Function (TVF)

    We identified and quantified the TVF goals that subjects valued but found difficult to achieve. To derive the TVF measure, at baseline subjects completed the Activities Inventory, a structured vision function questionnaire that asks patients to rate the value and difficulty of 48 vision function goals (e.g., daily meal preparation) and the tasks (e.g., seeing stove settings) that are required to achieve them. If a goal is important (range of 0 \[not important\]to 4 \[very important\]), the subject rates its "difficulty" (on a scale of 0 \[not difficult\] to 4 \[impossible\]). The average TVF score is the sum of the difficulty ratings of the (up to) 4 self-selected goals divided by the number of goals (from 1 to 4). Higher average scores indicate greater disability. At each outcome assessment subjects again rated the difficulty of the same targeted goals and the average TVF score was calculated.

    3-Months

  • Targeted Vision Function

    We identified and quantified the TVF goals that subjects valued but found difficult to achieve. To derive the TVF measure, at baseline subjects completed the Activities Inventory, a structured vision function questionnaire that asks patients to rate the value and difficulty of 48 vision function goals (e.g., daily meal preparation) and the tasks (e.g., seeing stove settings) that are required to achieve them. If a goal is important (range of 0 \[not important\]to 4 \[very important\]), the subject rates its "difficulty" (on a scale of 0 \[not difficult\] to 4 \[impossible\]). The average TVF score is the sum of the difficulty ratings of the (up to) 4 self-selected goals divided by the number of goals (from 1 to 4). Higher average scores indicate greater disability. At each outcome assessment subjects again rated the difficulty of the same targeted goals and the average TVF score was calculated.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Vision-related Quality of Life

    3-Months

  • Vision-related Quality of Life

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

PST

EXPERIMENTAL

Problem Solving Treatment (PST)

Behavioral: PST

ST

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Supportive Therapy (ST)

Behavioral: ST

Interventions

PSTBEHAVIORAL

PST will be delivered in subjects' homes over the course of 6 weeks.

PST
STBEHAVIORAL

ST will be delivered in subjects' homes over the course of 6 weeks.

ST

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Being at least 65 years old
  • Having bilateral Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) (atrophic or neovascular)
  • Having a best corrected visual acuity of 20/70 or worse
  • Moderate difficulty in at least one valued vision functional goal

You may not qualify if:

  • Ophthalmologic Criteria. Patients who have uncontrolled glaucoma (continued visual field loss and increase in optic nerve cupping), diabetic retinopathy (due to macular edema), or cataracts for which surgery within 6 months is likely will not be eligible to participate. This information will be obtained from patients' ophthalmology charts and discussion with the patient's ophthalmologist.
  • Cognitive Impairment Criteria. Cognitive functioning will be evaluated by the Project Director during the telephone screen (see Chapter 9). Patients with cognitive impairment will not be eligible to participate.
  • Health Criteria. Patients with life-threatening illness (e.g., terminal cancer, need for oxygen) will not be eligible to participate. Information regarding heath status will be gleaned from patient's ophthalmology charts.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Thomas Jefferson University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Rovner BW, Casten RJ, Massof RW, Leiby BE, Tasman WS; Wills Eye AMD Study. Psychological and cognitive determinants of vision function in age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul;129(7):885-90. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.146.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Macular Degeneration

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Retinal DegenerationRetinal DiseasesEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Barry W. Rovner, MD
Organization
Thomas Jefferson University

Study Officials

  • Barry W Rovner, MD

    Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2007

First Posted

December 12, 2007

Study Start

August 1, 2005

Primary Completion

June 1, 2013

Study Completion

June 1, 2013

Last Updated

April 15, 2025

Results First Posted

October 15, 2015

Record last verified: 2025-04

Locations