Efficacy and Safety of Grass Pollen Sublingual Immunotherapy
A Randomised, DB, Plcb Controlled, Multicentre, Multinational Phase II/III Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Three Different Dose Regimens of Oralgen Grass Pollen in Patients With Grass Pollen Related Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
2 other identifiers
interventional
605
7 countries
40
Brief Summary
The study is assessing efficacy and safety of three different dosage regimens of grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy in adult patients suffering from grass pollen related rhinoconjunctivitis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Dec 2006
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
40 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 4, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2008
CompletedMay 5, 2010
May 1, 2010
10 months
December 3, 2007
May 4, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary efficacy variable is based on pollen season rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (PS.RTSS)
One year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Diarised Period RTSS on severity of rhinoconjunctivitis scores and rescue medication usage will be calculated to assess efficacy. Safety will be assessed through AE profile, the assessment of routine safety tests.
one year
Study Arms (4)
grass pollen extract twice weekly
ACTIVE COMPARATORCurrent standard dose regimen of grass pollen immunotherapy (9,500 BU), given twice weekly. Note: patients in twice weekly dosing regimen will also receive placebo on days no active treatment is given.
Grass pollen extract, daily
ACTIVE COMPARATORGrass pollen immunotherapy, 9,500 BU, given daily
Increased dose of grass pollen extract
ACTIVE COMPARATORIncreased dose of grass pollen immunotherapy, 19,000 BU, given daily
Placebo control
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients randomized to placebo will receive placebo daily.
Interventions
Patients will receive drops of grass pollen immunotherapy sublingually
Patients will receive matching placebo sublingually
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- male or female aged 18-50
- patients with grass pollen related allergic rhinoconjunctivitis for at least 2 pollen seasons
- Positive skin prick test and IgE value of at least Class 2+
- RTSS of greater or equal to 14 during pollen season prior tot the start of the study
- Patients must be in general good health
- Patients with normal spirometry
- Informed consent given and willing to comply with the protocol
- Female patients are eligible if they use an accepted contraceptive method
- Negative urine pregnancy test if female
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy, breast feeding
- Asthma requiring treatment other than beta-2 inhaled agonists
- patients who have taken oral steroids within 12 weeks before screening visit
- patients who have received desensitisation treatment for grass pollen
- treatment by immunotherapy with any other allergen within the previous 5 years
- patients who have suffered a lower respiratory tract infection within 4 weeks or an upper respiratory tract infection within 2 weeks of the screening visit
- patients at risk of non-compliance
- participation in any other clinical study within the previous 3 months
- patients with a past or current disease, which may affect participation in or outcome of this study.
- patients treated with beta-blockers or under continuous corticotherapy
- allergic sensitivity to epithelial allergens the patients is exposed to
- positive skin prick test for environmental allergens and suffering from serious allergic symptoms due to exposure to these allergens during study period
- intention to subject the patient to surgery of the nasal cavity during current study
- Usual contraindications of immunotherapy
- a clinical history of symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or asthma due to tree pollen or weed pollen adjacent to the start of, and potentially overlapping the grass pollen season
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Artu Biologicalslead
Study Sites (40)
MHAT PLovdiv, ENT Clinic
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
5th MHAT, ENT Clinic
Sofia, Bulgaria
Military Medical Academy
Sofia, Bulgaria
Ministry of interior-central clinical database
Sofia, Bulgaria
MHAT Sveta Marina
Varna, Bulgaria
Military Medical Academy
Varna, Bulgaria
ORL Soukroma praxe
Brno, Czechia
Fakultni nemocnice Brno
Brno-Bohunice, Czechia
Nemocnice Caslav
Čáslav, Czechia
Alergologicka ordinace
Dobruška, Czechia
Alergologicka ambulance
Jablonec nad Nisou, Czechia
Alergologicka ordinace
Kutná Hora, Czechia
Alergologicka ambulance
Ostrava - Hrabuvka, Czechia
Ambulance plicni a alergologicka
Ostrave - Hrabuvka, Czechia
Alergologicka ambulance Okresni nemocnice Tabor
Tábor, Czechia
Berufsgen. kliniken Bergmannsheil
Bochum, Germany
Univ. klinikum Carl Gustav Carus
Dresden, Germany
MedicoKIT
Goch, Germany
Johannes-Gutenberg-Universitat Mainz
Mainz, Germany
Vital Care
München, Germany
Privataertz. inst. & Forsh. einrichtung
Wiesbaden, Germany
Svabhegyi Allami Gyermekgyogyintezet pulmonologia
Budapest, Hungary
Szent Janos Korhaz
Budapest, Hungary
Selye Janos Korhaz
Komárom, Hungary
Karolina Korhaz
Mosomagyarovar, Hungary
Tudogyogyintezet Torokbalint
Törökbálint, Hungary
Kaunas medical University hospital
Kaunas, Lithuania
Klaipeda Regional Hospital
Klaipėda, Lithuania
JSC Seimos gydytojas
Vilnius, Lithuania
Vilnius Central Outpatient Clinic
Vilnius, Lithuania
Vilnius university hospital, Santariskiu Clinic
Vilnius, Lithuania
Ampha
's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
Ampha
De Bilt, Netherlands
Ampha
Hengelo, Netherlands
Menox
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Centrum imunologie a alergologie s.r.o
Bratislava, Slovakia
FNsP Nove Zamky, ambulancia TaRCh
Nové Zámky, Slovakia
Amb. klinickey imunologie a allergologie UTaRCH
Poprad, Slovakia
Ambulancia klinickej imunologie a alergologie
Trenčín, Slovakia
Medcentrum s.r.o.
Žilina, Slovakia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Folkert R Roossien
Artu-Biologicals Europe B.V., the Netherlands
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2007
First Posted
December 4, 2007
Study Start
December 1, 2006
Primary Completion
October 1, 2007
Study Completion
March 1, 2008
Last Updated
May 5, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-05