Treatment for Bipolar Depression: Acute & Prophylactic Efficacy With Citalopram
2 other identifiers
interventional
119
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Bipolar depression is one of the least studied depressive illnesses. The standard practice for many doctors is to use antidepressant medicines, but there are few studies on the long-term results of these medicines. The goal of this study is to look at how effective and safe these medicines are in treating bipolar depression when taken with a mood stabilizer medicine. The drug being studied is citalopram, also known as Celexa. Celexa is FDA approved for the treatment of major depression, but is not FDA approved for the treatment of bipolar depression. It is, however, standard practice for many doctors is to use antidepressants, like Celexa, to treat their patients with bipolar disorder depression. The drug will be studied in three ways. We will see if it helps treat depressive symptoms. We will see how the drug affects the brain using PET and fMRI scans. Finally, we will look at the possibility that there may be a gene that could predict if a person would get better taking the drug using genetics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Nov 2007
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 13, 2017
CompletedMarch 24, 2017
February 1, 2017
6.7 years
November 20, 2007
July 7, 2016
February 21, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
MADRS Rating Scale Change
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating scale assessed in mixed effects regression model. The total range for the scale is 0 to 60. Lower values involve less depression, while higher values involve worse depression. The change in the MADRS scale is interpreted as higher values meaning better outcomes, because more depressive symptoms are improved.
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
citalopram + mood stabilizer
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll patients are on baseline mood stabilizers and are randomized to receive citalopram or placebo. In this arm, they are randomly assigned to citalopram.
placebo + mood stabilizer
PLACEBO COMPARATORAll patients are on baseline mood stabilizers and are randomized to receive citalopram or placebo. In this arm, they are randomly assigned to placebo
Interventions
Citalopram dose will be flexibly designed, beginning at 10 mg/d for at least one week, and the increased by 10 mg per week to a maximum of 50 mg/d. No target dose will be provided but rather clinicians will dose to clinical efficacy. Thus the study will provide clinicians data on the effective dose if it is positive. The dose will not be predetermined at static amounts.
This arm will only receive mood stabilizing medication. All subjects will be required to receive treatment with lithium, lamotrigine, valproate, or carbamazepine for at least one month at therapeutic blood levels or doses before randomization, or they must initiate one of these agents at study entry.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Current age ≥18 years
- DSM-IV diagnosis of BPD, type-I, or type-II
- Current major depressive episode using DSM-IV criteria, lasting 8 weeks or longer.
- Use of lithium, divalproex, carbamazepine, or lamotrigine at therapeutic serum levels or doses for ≥4 weeks prior to study entry, or willingness to accept one of these agents.
- Prior to initial evaluations, each subject must provide competent, written, informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Past non-response to a therapeutic trial of R,S-citalopram (≥100 mg/day for ≥8 weeks).
- Previous intolerance of R,S-citalopram;
- Diagnosis of unipolar depression
- Diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder
- Serious medical illness with acute instability (cardiac, respiratory, hepatic, renal), based on hospitalization in the past month
- Abnormal thyroid function tests
- Previous allergic reaction to or inability to tolerate lithium, divalproex, or carbamazepine at therapeutic serum levels.
- Current or past renal dysfunction if taking lithium
- Current or past hepatitis or other liver disease if taking divalproex
- Current or past hematologic disease if on carbamazepine
- Severe suicidal ideation, plan or intent, as documented by a score of ≥4 on the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale suicidality item (Item 10).
- Presence of psychosis
- Cognitive impairment sufficient to impair ability to give informed consent.
- Current pregnancy, or inability to utilize contraception
- The presence of any metallic implants
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tufts Medical Centerlead
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States
Related Publications (1)
Ghaemi SN, Whitham EA, Vohringer PA, Barroilhet SA, Amerio A, Sverdlov O, Patkar AA. Citalopram for Acute and Preventive Efficacy in Bipolar Depression (CAPE-BD): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 12;82(1):19m13136. doi: 10.4088/JCP.19m13136.
PMID: 33434956DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Nassir Ghaemi
- Organization
- Tufts Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nassir Ghaemi, MD, MPH
Tufts University Medical
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2007
First Posted
November 22, 2007
Study Start
November 1, 2007
Primary Completion
July 1, 2014
Study Completion
July 1, 2014
Last Updated
March 24, 2017
Results First Posted
February 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share