Children's Aid Societies: Differential Response and Wraparound Prevention Trial
The Comparative Effects and Expense of Augmenting Usual Children's Aid Society (CAS) Care With a Regional Differential Response and Wraparound Prevention Service for Children
2 other identifiers
observational
135
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of this Differential Wraparound model, in 5 Children's Aid Societies within Hamilton-Niagara Region, in preventing maltreatment cases from either becoming ongoing protection cases, or the children ending up in out-of-home of out-of community placements, as well as reducing the amount of time in Children's Aid Society care as compared to usual Children's Aid Society risk assessment and protection service alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2006
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 16, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedJune 23, 2011
November 1, 2009
November 15, 2007
June 22, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To measure the characteristics of families and their children and comparisons between usual care versus differential response
Follow-up at 1 year and 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Follow up measures at 1 year and 2 year follow ups including measuring whether differential response is happening
6 months after facilitator is assigned
Study Arms (1)
Children's Aid Societies
Comparing differential response (Wraparound) with usual care
Eligibility Criteria
Clients of CAS going on to protective custody cases
You may qualify if:
- Parent of children and youth, living in Hamilton and surrounding areas.
- Newly referred substantiated cases going on to protective services.
- English \& non-English speaking.
You may not qualify if:
- Safety threat
- Non-substantiated cases not going to protective services.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hamilton Children's Aid Societylead
- McMaster Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Children's Aid Society
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4B9, Canada
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dominic Verticchio
Children's Aid Society
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2007
First Posted
November 16, 2007
Study Start
October 1, 2006
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
June 23, 2011
Record last verified: 2009-11