Samarium Sm 153 Lexidronam Pentasodium and 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy or Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Rising Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
A Phase II Trial of Samarium 153 Followed by Salvage Prostatic Fossa 3D-CRT or IMRT Irradiation in High-Risk, Clinically Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
3 other identifiers
interventional
67
1 country
29
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Giving samarium Sm 153 lexidronam pentasodium and 3-dimensional (3-D) conformal radiation therapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy may keep prostate cancer from growing in patients with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well samarium Sm 153 lexidronam pentasodium and 3-D conformal radiation therapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy work in treating patients with rising PSA levels after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 prostate-cancer
Started Apr 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_2 prostate-cancer
29 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 30, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 31, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 25, 2017
CompletedJuly 25, 2017
June 1, 2017
6.3 years
October 30, 2007
September 6, 2016
June 26, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of Patients With PSA Response (pt) Within 12 Weeks of Samarium 153 Administration
A PSA response for each patient is calculated by (baseline PSA-current PSA)/baseline PSA. A decline of at least 30% is considered a response. Null hypothesis (H0): Samarium 153 is not effective (pt ≤ 0.1) vs alternative hypothesis (HA): Samarium 153 is effective (pt ≥ 0.25). The sample size of 69 analyzable patients (eligible patients receiving any protocol treatment with ≥ 12 weeks follow-up from the Samarium 153 injection) was calculated based on Fleming's Multiple Testing Procedure at a significance level of 0.019 and 91% statistical power requiring 69 patients to conclude either the null or alternative hypotheses. With only 52 analyzable patients this study had only 78% power and needed at least 11 patients with a PSA response to reject H0.
Twelve weeks from the date of Samarium 153 infusion.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Completion of Therapy
90 days from the end of radiation therapy.
Number of Patients With Hematologic Toxicity at 12 Weeks
Twelve weeks from the date of Samarium 153 infusion.
Samarium 153-related Adverse Events at 12 Weeks (Percentage of Patients)
Twelve weeks from the date of Samarium 153 infusion
Acute and Late Radiotherapy-Related Adverse Events
90 days from start of radiotherapy
Freedom From Progression (FFP) Rate at 2 Years
From randomization to 2 years
Study Arms (1)
Radiotherapy + Samarium 153
EXPERIMENTALSamarium 153 infusion followed by radiotherapy 12 weeks later
Interventions
3D-CRT or IMRT 64.8-70.2 Gy to the prostatic fossa begins 12 weeks (+/- 1 week) after Samarium 153 administration. Daily tumor doses of 1.8 - 2.0 Gy per day, 5 days per week x 7-8 weeks.
Samarium 153 lexidronam dose 2.0 mCi/kg by IV injection one time within 2 weeks (+/- 3days) after registration.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically proven diagnosis of prostate cancer progressing after prior radical prostatectomy as indicated by one of the following:
- Postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rising above 1.0 ng/mL
- Postoperative PSA rising above 0.2 ng/mL with a surgical tumor Gleason score of 9 or 10
- Postoperative PSA rising above 0.2 ng/ml with nodal disease
- Stage II-IV disease (T2 -T4, N0-N1)
- No distant metastases based on the following minimum diagnostic work up:
- History or physical examination within the past 8 weeks
- Bone scan negative for bone metastases within the past 4 months
- Abdominal imaging negative for metastases within the past 6 months
You may not qualify if:
- Biopsy evidence of M1 disease
- Presence of neuroendocrine features in any prostate cancer specimen
- PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- Zubrod Performance Status 0-1
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,800 cells/mm³
- Platelet count ≥ 100,000 cells/mm³
- Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL (transfusion or other intervention to achieve Hgb ≥ 8.0 g/dl is permitted)
- Prior invasive malignancy (except nonmelanoma skin cancer) unless disease free for a minimum of 3 years
- Severe, active comorbidity, defined as follows:
- Unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization within the last 6 months
- Transmural myocardial infarction within the last 6 months
- Acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of registration
- Hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects (laboratory tests for liver function and coagulation parameters, however, are not required for entry into this protocol)
- Renal failure (laboratory tests for renal function, however, are not required for entry into this protocol)
- AIDS based upon current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) definition (HIV testing is not required)
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Radiation Therapy Oncology Grouplead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
- NRG Oncologycollaborator
Study Sites (29)
Arizona Oncology Services Foundation
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013, United States
Auburn Radiation Oncology
Auburn, California, 95603, United States
Radiation Oncology Centers - Cameron Park
Cameron Park, California, 95682, United States
Mercy Cancer Center at Mercy San Juan Medical Center
Carmichael, California, 95608, United States
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90027, United States
Radiation Oncology Center - Roseville
Roseville, California, 95661, United States
Radiological Associates of Sacramento Medical Group, Incorporated
Sacramento, California, 95815, United States
University of California Davis Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Mercy General Hospital
Sacramento, California, 95819, United States
Solano Radiation Oncology Center
Vacaville, California, 95687, United States
CCOP - Christiana Care Health Services
Newark, Delaware, 19713, United States
University of Florida Shands Cancer Center
Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0232, United States
John B. Amos Cancer Center
Columbus, Georgia, 31904, United States
Tulane Cancer Center Office of Clinical Research
Alexandria, Louisiana, 71315-3198, United States
Hudner Oncology Center at Saint Anne's Hospital - Fall River
Fall River, Massachusetts, 02721, United States
West Michigan Cancer Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007-3731, United States
Regional Cancer Center at Singing River Hospital
Pascagoula, Mississippi, 39581, United States
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Saint Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
David C. Pratt Cancer Center at St. John's Mercy
St Louis, Missouri, 63141, United States
Billings Clinic - Downtown
Billings, Montana, 59107-7000, United States
Stony Brook University Cancer Center
Stony Brook, New York, 11794-9446, United States
McDowell Cancer Center at Akron General Medical Center
Akron, Ohio, 44307, United States
Summa Center for Cancer Care at Akron City Hospital
Akron, Ohio, 44309-2090, United States
Barberton Citizens Hospital
Barberton, Ohio, 44203, United States
Robinson Radiation Oncology
Ravenna, Ohio, 44266, United States
Oklahoma University Cancer Institute
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107-5541, United States
Sentara Cancer Institute at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States
Coastal Cancer Center at Sentara Virginia Beach General Hospital
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23454, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Comparison of freedom from progression rate at two years with Kattan Nomograms was not possible because the pretreatment data needed for the Kattan Nomograms was not collected.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Wendy Seiferheld, M.S.
- Organization
- NRG Oncology
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard K. Valicenti, MD
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
- STUDY CHAIR
Oliver Sartor, MD
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 30, 2007
First Posted
October 31, 2007
Study Start
April 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
July 25, 2017
Results First Posted
July 25, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06