Study Stopped
Study was stopped following interim analysis.
A Comparison of Surgical Preparations and Wound Infection Rates for Elective Cesarean Sections
Povidone-iodine vs. Chlorhexidine Gluconate - A Comparison of Surgical Preparations and Wound Infection Rates for Elective Cesarean Sections
1 other identifier
interventional
268
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to find out if chlorhexidine gluconate solution is better at reducing the rate of wound infection after cesarean section compared to povidone-iodine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Dec 2007
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 11, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2010
CompletedNovember 9, 2012
November 1, 2012
2.2 years
September 10, 2007
November 8, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
to determine the rate of wound infection using two standard wound preparations: povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate
within 6 weeks following surgery
Secondary Outcomes (5)
readmission to hospital
within 6 weeks following surgery
extended length of admission
within 6 weeks following surgery
need for intravenous antibiotics
within 6 weeks following surgery
need for repeat procedure such as drainage
within 6 weeks following surgery
increased outpatient surveillance
within 6 weeks following surgery
Study Arms (2)
A
ACTIVE COMPARATORpovidone-iodine
B
ACTIVE COMPARATORchlorhexidine gluconate
Interventions
Abdominal surgical field cleaned with 5% povidone-iodine detergent scrub, detergent cleaned from surgical area with sterile water, and then painted with 1% povidone-iodine solution.
Abdominal surgical field painted once using 2% chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \>19 years
- Gestational age \> 37 weeks
- Booked elective cesarean section
You may not qualify if:
- Gestational age \< 37 weeks
- Premature rupture of membranes
- Onset of labor prior to procedure
- Evidence of maternal sepsis; maternal fever \> 38.5C
- LSCS for emergency issues: non-reassuring fetal status, placental abruption, failed induction
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Memorial University of Newfoundlandlead
- Eastern Healthcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Women' s Health Centre, Eastern Health
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1E 5K9, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paula Mallaley, MD
Resident, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial University of Newfoundland
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2007
First Posted
September 11, 2007
Study Start
December 1, 2007
Primary Completion
February 1, 2010
Study Completion
February 1, 2010
Last Updated
November 9, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-11