Study Stopped
it stopped at a regulatory stage
Pharmacological vs Surgical Treatment for Mixed Incontinence
Randomized Pilot Study on the Treatment of Mixed Urinary Incontinence: Pharmacological Treatment (Tolterodine SR) vs Surgery With Tension Free Vaginal Tape
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In patients with symptoms of mixed incontinence (loss of urine associated with coughing/sneezing/laughing, and loss of urine associated with the strong urge to void), is surgical treatment with tension free vaginal tape or pharmacological treatment with tolterodine more effective? What are the parameters predictive of success or failure with either forms of treatment? What are the parameters predictive of the necessity for further treatment after primary treatment? Patients will be randomised to having surgical or pharmacological treatment for their mixed incontinence symptoms. They will be assessed subjectively and objectively pre-treatment and after treatment at intervals up to 3 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Sep 2007
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 30, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2010
CompletedJuly 29, 2024
July 1, 2024
2.3 years
August 29, 2007
July 26, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
improvement in subjective and objective measures of urinary incontinence
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
assessment of pre-treatment predictors of success or failure of treatment
3 months
assessment of pre-treatment predictors of requirement for alternative treatment
3 months
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORTension Free Vaginal Tape
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORTolterodine tartrate 4mg
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must be female as this is a urogynaecology study.
- An age of between 35 and 70 years. This takes into account that incontinence tends to prevail in women with advancing years. Younger women may be planning to start a family which precludes them from participating.
- Clinical urodynamic evidence of mixed incontinence with prevalence of symptoms of stress incontinence assessed by means of a specific questionnaire and visual analog scale (VAS). The study is assessing the treatment of mixed incontinence and the patients will have to have evidence of this which is provided by their symptoms.
- Candidates for corrective surgery of the component of sphincter defect with Ba \< - 1 according to the International Continence Society (ICS) classification of genital prolapse.
- Patients capable of filling in the micturition diary, the VAS, and the pathology specific quality of life questionnaire, the Kings Health Questionnaire. These form part of the continuing assessment of effectiveness of treatment.
- Patients capable of understanding and signing an informed written consent form for participating in the trial. If patients are unable to give their consent for the procedures and investigations they cannot be ethically recruited.
- Patients who accept not to give birth vaginally in the future, so as not to jeopardize the results of the surgical operation.
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications for using anti-cholinergic agents (urinary retention, uncontrolled narrow-angle glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, severe ulcerative colitis, toxic megacolon). Anticholinergics form one group of the patients and inability to take these drugs therefore precludes them from participating.
- Ascertained hypersensitivity to tolterodine or any of the excipients. For the above reason.
- Patients with urinary tract infections (UTI) during the run-in period.
- Patients with recurrent urinary tract infections (\> 5 in the past 12 months).
- Patients with diagnosed interstitial cystitis.
- These compromise the results obtained.
- Patients with haematuria of uncertain origin. These patients need urgent investigation of these signs with procedures that are not included in the study.
- Patients on treatment with anti-cholinergic agents of other drugs acting on detrusor instability. This will compromise the results of the study if for example these patients are randomised into the surgical group.
- Patients on diuretics. This affect their urinary behaviour.
- Patients on concomitant treatment with potent CYP 34A inhibitors, such as macrolide antibiotics or antimycotic agents.
- Patients who have undergone previous surgery on the distal urinary tract (with the exception of hysterectomy).
- Patients who do not have adequate contraceptive cover or patients who are breast-feeding. For reasons of avoiding pregnancy during the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Demetri C Panayi
London, sw18 4qr, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Vikram Khullar
Imperial College London
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2007
First Posted
August 30, 2007
Study Start
September 1, 2007
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
July 29, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07