Study Stopped
slow recruitment
Weighted Vaginal Cones Versus Biofeedback in the Treatment of Urodynamic Stress Incontinence: a Randomized Trial.
A Randomised, Single-Blind Comparison of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises With Biofeedback Versus Weighted Vaginal Cones in the Management of Genuine Stress Incontinence : A Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the objective (urodynamic) cure rates and effect on patient quality of life after six months of treatment for two different nonsurgical management options for genuine stress urinary incontinence in females: weighted vaginal cones and formal supervised pelvic floor physiotherapy with biofeedback. Hypothesis: Assuming a minimum of six months of treatment, weighted vaginal cones are as effective as a formal supervised program of pelvic floor physiotherapy with biofeedback for the treatment of uncomplicated genuine stress urinary incontinence in females.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Sep 2001
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2001
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2007
CompletedJanuary 27, 2016
January 1, 2016
5.3 years
October 31, 2005
January 25, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Urodynamic studies
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Cough stress test
6 months
Standardized fixed bladder volume pad test
6 months
I-QOL questionnaire
6 months
Urogenital Distress Inventory
6 months
Study Arms (2)
a
EXPERIMENTALWeighted vaginal cones used to perform pelvic floor exercises
b
ACTIVE COMPARATORBiofeedback
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- urodynamic identification detrusor instability
- active (untreated or resistant) urinary tract infection
- any other disease that is felt by the investigators to potentially interfere with participation (e.g. arthritis limiting dexterity and thus interfering with the insertion and removal of vaginal cones)
- previous treatment with pelvic floor physiotherapy with biofeedback or functional electric stimulation for urinary incontinence
- previous use of weighted vaginal cones
- previous anti-incontinence surgery
- significant pelvic organ prolapse or those with abnormal vaginal anatomy (the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system of scoring for prolapse will be used, Grade \> III)
- use of concomitant treatments during the trial or the start of new medications that may alter continence mechanism
- inability to understand instructions in French or English or provide informed consent (e.g., psychiatric disease).
- pregnancy (which may alter pelvic anatomy may over the course of the study and thus make evaluation of treatment methods impossible)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 4P8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marie-Andree Harvey, MD MSc
Queen's University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2005
First Posted
November 1, 2005
Study Start
September 1, 2001
Primary Completion
January 1, 2007
Study Completion
October 1, 2007
Last Updated
January 27, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01