Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin Versus Simvastatin in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Dyslipidemia
A Phase IV, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-arm, Comparative and Forced- Titration Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin Versus Simvastatin in Patients With Type 2 DM and Dyslipidemia
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This is a phase IV, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm, comparative and forced- titration study to compare the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus simvastatin in patients with type 2 DM and dyslipidemia. When comparing the efficacy of rosuvastatin 20 mg with simvastatin 40 mg for the treatment of type 2 DM with dyslipidemia, rosuvastatin 20 mg is superior to simvastatin 40 mg in achieving the combined goal of LDL-C (\<100 mg/dL) and non-HDL-C (\<130 mg/dL).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 diabetes-mellitus
Started Jun 2006
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 25, 2007
CompletedDecember 6, 2011
December 1, 2011
1.1 years
July 24, 2007
December 5, 2011
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The percentage of patients achieving the combined treatment goal of LDL-C < 100mg/dl and non-HDL-C < 130 mg/dl at week 12 with rosuvastatin treatment compared with simvastatin treatment
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Achieving the combined treatment goal of LDL-C (<100 mg/dL) and non-HDL-C (130 mg/dL) at week 4;
4 weeks
Percentage of patients achieving the LDL-C goal of <100 mg/dL at week 4 and week 12;
12 weeks
Percentage of patients achieving the LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL at Week;The mean percent change from baseline in lipid profile at week 4 and week 12;
12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATOR10 mg rosuvastatin for 4 weeks followed by 20 m rosuvastatin for another 8 weeks
2
ACTIVE COMPARATOR20 mg simvastatin for 4 weeks followed by 40 mg simvastatin for another 8 weeks
Interventions
10 mg rosuvastatin for 4 weeks followed by rosuvastatin or another 12 weeks
20 mg simvastatin for 4 weeks followed by 40 mg simvastatin for another 8 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female between the ages of 20-75 years.
- Female patients post menopausal, hysterectomized or if of childbearing potential using a reliable method of birth control.
- Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
- Fasting triglyceride ≧150 mg/dL ≦500 mg/dL or Non-HDL-C≧130,but≦200 mg/dL
- Patients receiving stable antidiabetic treatment for 8 weeks before randomization (no change in the category of anti-diabetic agents, but the dose is adjustable).
- All patients give written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- A history of hypersensitivity to statins.
- A history of rhabdomyolysis or hereditary muscle disorders.
- Insulin-treated patients.
- Patient with any conditions of acute or chronic pancreatitis.
- Creatine kinase ≧3-fold upper limit of normal (ULN).
- Patients with an estimated creatinine clearance (see note)≦30 ml/min or bilirubin ≧1.5-fold ULN, or chronic active hepatitis or liver function impairment (AST and ALT ≧3-fold ULN).
- Overt proteinuria (repeat spot urine protein \>300mg/dl by dipstick method).
- Patients are taking cyclosporine.
- A history of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or familial dysbetalipoproteinemia.
- Patients with alcohol and drug abuse in past 3 years.
- Serious or unstable medical or psychological conditions.
- Hypothyroidism (TSH \> 5 μIU/mL).
- In the investigator's opinion, continuation in the study would be detrimental to the patient's well-being or might confound the clinical trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
Taichung, Taiwan
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
Related Publications (1)
Wu TH, Lee IT, Ho LT, Sheu WH, Hwu CM. Combined lipid goal attainment in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia: A head-to-head comparative trial of statins. J Chin Med Assoc. 2022 Aug 1;85(8):831-838. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000765. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
PMID: 35727095DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chii-Min Hwu, MD
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wayne H Sheu, MD,phD
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Attending physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2007
First Posted
July 25, 2007
Study Start
June 1, 2006
Primary Completion
July 1, 2007
Study Completion
July 1, 2007
Last Updated
December 6, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-12