Ketamine In Thoracic Surgery (KITS) Trial
KITS
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aim of the study is to demonstrate a reduction in circulating interleukin 6 levels at 4 and 24 hours after completion of lobectomy (either VATS or open). The null hypothesis (H0) is thus that there is no difference in circulating interleukin 6 levels when patients are given either ketamine or placebo (0.9% saline in equivalent volume). The alternative (two tailed) hypothesis (HA) if the null is disproved is that ketamine leads to significantly different levels of interleukin 6 at 4 and 24 hours after completion of surgery. We plan to randomize 40 patients to receive either ketamine or placebo, in a block of 4 randomization design stratified by whether surgery is performed by VATS or open lobectomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 lung-cancer
Started Jul 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 lung-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2007
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 16, 2012
CompletedJuly 25, 2014
November 1, 2012
5 months
July 18, 2007
September 29, 2011
July 18, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Interleukin Levels at 24 Hours
24 Hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
C-reactive Protein (CRP) Serum Levels
24 hours
Verbal Pain Scores
baseline, 4 hours, 24 hours and at discharge
Study Arms (2)
Ketamine
EXPERIMENTALSingle bolus 0.5mg/kg ketamine IV after induction of anesthesia
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOR0.9 % saline bolus of equivalent volume
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients presenting for lobectomy either VATS or open.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with myocardial infarction in the previous six months,
- Patients with a history of psychotic disorder,
- Patients with a history of chronic pain syndrome,
- Patients with documented previous allergy to ketamine.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Related Publications (5)
Roytblat L, Talmor D, Rachinsky M, Greemberg L, Pekar A, Appelbaum A, Gurman GM, Shapira Y, Duvdenani A. Ketamine attenuates the interleukin-6 response after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg. 1998 Aug;87(2):266-71. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199808000-00006.
PMID: 9706914BACKGROUNDBartoc C, Frumento RJ, Jalbout M, Bennett-Guerrero E, Du E, Nishanian E. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the anti-inflammatory effects of ketamine in cardiac surgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2006 Apr;20(2):217-22. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2005.12.005. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
PMID: 16616662BACKGROUNDTashima T, Yamashita J, Nakano S, Joutsuka T, Hayashi N, Saishoji T, Ogawa M. Comparison of video-assisted minithoracotomy and standard open thoracotomy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2005;14(3):203-8. doi: 10.1080/13645700510034001.
PMID: 16754164BACKGROUNDCraig SR, Leaver HA, Yap PL, Pugh GC, Walker WS. Acute phase responses following minimal access and conventional thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001 Sep;20(3):455-63. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(01)00841-7.
PMID: 11509263BACKGROUNDYim AP, Wan S, Lee TW, Arifi AA. VATS lobectomy reduces cytokine responses compared with conventional surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Jul;70(1):243-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01258-3.
PMID: 10921716BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Andrew Shaw MD
- Organization
- Duke University Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andy Shaw, M. D.
Duke University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2007
First Posted
July 20, 2007
Study Start
July 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2007
Study Completion
December 1, 2007
Last Updated
July 25, 2014
Results First Posted
November 16, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-11