NCT00499746

Brief Summary

This research is part of a set of studies whose purpose is to test whether tramadol can be used for the treatment of opioid addiction. Tramadol is already available in the United States as a pain medicine marketed as Ultram. It has effects similar to morphine, and it may also have effects similar to other drugs like stimulants. The doses of tramadol used in this study are higher than those generally used for the treatment of pain. To be in this study a participant must be a user of opioids (drugs like heroin) and stimulants (drugs like cocaine), but cannot be addicted to either. The person must be between 21-55 years old, and generally healthy. Up to 12 people will take part in this study.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2007

Typical duration for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 9, 2007

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 11, 2007

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2007

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2010

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2011

Completed
6.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 17, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

October 17, 2017

Status Verified

September 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

July 9, 2007

Results QC Date

August 18, 2012

Last Update Submit

September 14, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

drug discriminationopioid pharmacologybehavioral pharmacologyhuman research

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Acquisition of Discrimination Assessed by Accuracy of the Discrimination Test

    The acquisition of discrimination was to test whether volunteers could identify each training drug condition by the correct letter code. Results are the percentage of correct responses with a range of 0% to 100%.

    1 day

  • Discrimination Effects Assessed by Operant Responses

    Volunteers emitted operant responses on computer keys that corresponded to the training letter, on a fixed interval 1 second schedule for 8.5 minutes. The range is from 0 to 500 operant responses.

    1 day

  • Discrimination Effects Assessed by Point Distribution

    In point distribution, volunteers distributed 50 points among three training drug letters depending on how certain they were of the identity of the administrated drug. Maximum total is 50 points.

    1day

  • Discrimination Effects Assessed by Discrete Choice

    During discrete choice, volunteers were given three choices (placebo, hydromorphone, methylphenidate) and were asked to choose which of the training drugs they thought they received. The outcome measure illustrates the percentage of participants who chose either placebo, hydromorphone, or methylphenidate during each drug condition (i.e., Placebo, Hydromorphone 8 mg, Tramadol 50 mg, etc.), ranging from 0-100. The outcome measure represents the percentage of participants who chose either placebo, opioid agonist, or stimulant across each drug condition.

    1 day

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Physiologic Effects Assessed by the Pharmacological Class Questionnaire

    Measure at 120 min after drug administration

  • Physiological Effects Assessed by Peak Change From Baseline Pupil Diameter

    Measure at 120 min after drug administration

  • Peak Change From Baseline Opioid Agonist Effects Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Measure at 120 min after drug administration

  • Peak Change From Baseline Stimulant Effects Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Measure at 120 min after drug administration

Study Arms (4)

Tramadol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

oral dose, once per day

Drug: tramadol

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

oral dose, once per day

Drug: placebo

hydromorphone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

oral dose, once per day

Drug: Hydromorphone

methylphenidate

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

oral dose, once per day

Drug: Methylphenidate

Interventions

oral dose, once per day

Also known as: Ultram
Tramadol

oral dose, once per day

Also known as: sugar pill
Placebo

oral dose, once per day

Also known as: Dilaudid
hydromorphone

oral dose, once per day

Also known as: stimulant
methylphenidate

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Months - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Study subjects are male and female non-dependent opioid users with active stimulant use.
  • Between the ages of 21-55
  • In good physical health
  • Without significant psychiatric illness besides their drug use.
  • Females are required to provide a negative pregnancy test prior to study participation.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects are excluded if they have evidence of significant medical (e.g., insulin dependent diabetes mellitus) or psychiatric (e.g., schizophrenia) illness.
  • Subjects with a history of seizures will be excluded.
  • Persons with current history of significant alcohol or sedative/hypnotic drug use will be excluded from study participation.
  • Applicants seeking treatment for their substance abuse will not be admitted to the study, and will be provided information about treatment services available.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit

Baltimore, Maryland, 21224, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Duke AN, Bigelow GE, Lanier RK, Strain EC. Discriminative stimulus effects of tramadol in humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011 Jul;338(1):255-62. doi: 10.1124/jpet.111.181131. Epub 2011 Apr 5.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Opioid-Related Disorders

Interventions

TramadolSugarsHydromorphoneMethylphenidateCentral Nervous System Stimulants

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Narcotic-Related DisordersSubstance-Related DisordersChemically-Induced DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CyclohexanolsHexanolsFatty AlcoholsAlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsDimethylaminesMethylaminesAminesLipidsCarbohydratesMorphine DerivativesMorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic CompoundsPhenylacetatesAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingPhysiological Effects of DrugsPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesCentral Nervous System AgentsTherapeutic Uses

Results Point of Contact

Title
Eric C. Strain, M.D.
Organization
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Study Officials

  • Eric C Strain, M.D.

    Johns Hopkins University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
NIH
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2007

First Posted

July 11, 2007

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion

April 1, 2010

Study Completion

August 1, 2011

Last Updated

October 17, 2017

Results First Posted

October 17, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-09

Locations