Comparison of Ultrasound and Nerve Stimulation Technique for Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block
A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Nerve Stimulation Guidance of Popliteal, Sciatic Catheter Placement After Major Foot and Ankle Surgery: Clinical Outcome and Cost Analysis
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The most useful method to manage pain after major foot and ankle surgery is infusion of local anesthetic with a catheter close to the sciatic nerve in the popliteal space above the knee joint. Inaccurate catheter placement and spread of local anesthetic account for most failures. The most prevalent method to place the catheter is the traditional nerve stimulation technique relying on surface anatomic landmarks and electrical stimulation to localize the sciatic nerve. In recent years ultrasound technique has been applied to provide real-time, visual guidance of catheter placement. The purpose of this randomized, controlled trial is to compare the success rate, patient acceptance and cost-effectiveness of the ultrasound and nerve stimulation techniques.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain
Started Aug 2007
Typical duration for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 4, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 6, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2009
CompletedDecember 21, 2009
December 1, 2009
2.2 years
July 4, 2007
December 18, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success rate: post-operative analgesia
First two post-operative days
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Time consumption of catheter placement
Before surgery
Duration of post-operative observation
After surgery
Pain score
First two post-operative days
Nausea score
First two post-operative days
Sensory block
First two post-operative days
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
I
EXPERIMENTALUltrasound guided placement of popliteal catheter
II
EXPERIMENTALNerve stimulation guided placement of popliteal catheter
Interventions
Bolus naropin 7,5 mg/ml 30 ml; infusion bupivacaine 2,5 mg/ml 5-10 ml/h
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- elective posterior foot and/or ankle surgery
- calcaneus osteotomy
- subtalar arthrodesis
- total ankle arthroplasty
- ankle arthrodesis (non-arthroscopic) minimum age 18 years ASA I-III informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- coagulation disorders
- infection in the region of needle insertion
- systemic infection
- preoperative sciatic nerve neuropathy
- preoperative motor or sensory deficit in the operative extremity
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth disorder
- diabetic neuropathy
- severe peripheral vascular disease
- allergy to local anesthetics
- lack of understanding of the visual analogue scale
- communication problems
- dementia
- body mass index above 35
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Aarhuslead
- National Board of Health, Denmarkcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Anesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Related Publications (2)
Ehlers L, Jensen JM, Bendtsen TF. Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound vs nerve stimulation guidance for continuous sciatic nerve block. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Nov;109(5):804-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes259. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
PMID: 22855632DERIVEDBendtsen TF, Nielsen TD, Rohde CV, Kibak K, Linde F. Ultrasound guidance improves a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block when compared with nerve stimulation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):181-4. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e31820d421f.
PMID: 21425514DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas F Bendtsen, Ph.d.
Department of Anesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Norrebrogade, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 4, 2007
First Posted
July 6, 2007
Study Start
August 1, 2007
Primary Completion
October 1, 2009
Study Completion
October 1, 2009
Last Updated
December 21, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-12