Focal In-stent Restenosis After Drug-Eluting Stent
FOCUS
FOcal Type In-stent Restenosis After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Treated by CUtting Balloon Angioplasty Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
15
Brief Summary
To evaluate the optimal management of focal in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation with sirolimus-eluting implantation versus cutting balloon angioplasty
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Mar 2007
Longer than P75 for phase_4
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2011
CompletedAugust 8, 2012
August 1, 2012
4 years
June 11, 2007
August 6, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Binary In-segment Restenosis
At 9 months angiographic follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Composite end-point of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization
At 9-month after index procedure
Stent thrombosis
In-hospital, 30 days, 9 months, and 1year
Late luminal loss
at 8 month angiographic follow-up
Procedural success defined as achievement of a final diameter stenosis of <30% by QCA using any percutaneous method, without the occurrence of death, Q wave MI, or repeat revascularization of the target lesion
during the hospital stay
Study Arms (2)
Cutting balloon
EXPERIMENTALCutting balloon
Sirolimus-eluting stent
ACTIVE COMPARATORSirolimus-eluting stent
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient must be at least 18 years of age.
- Restenosis after drug-eluting stents (\>50% by visual estimate)
- Lesion length \< 10 mm (focal ISR)
- Patients with stable (CCS class 1 to 4) or acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina pectoris Braunwald class IB, IC, IIB, IIC, IIIB, IIIC or NSTEMI) or patients with atypical chest pain or without symptoms but having documented myocardial ischemia, amenable to stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention
- The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical and angiographic follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.
You may not qualify if:
- The patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications:
- Heparin
- Aspirin
- Both Clopidogrel and TIclopidine
- Sirolimus eluting stent
- Stainless steel and/or
- Contrast media (patients with documented sensitivity to contrast which can be effectively pre-medicated with steroids and diphenhydramine \[e.g. rash\] may be enrolled. Patients with true anaphylaxis to prior contrast media, however, should not be enrolled).
- Systemic (intravenous) Sirolimus use within 12 months.
- Female of childbearing potential, unless a recent pregnancy test is negative, who possibly plan to become pregnant any time after enrollment into this study.
- History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy (including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia), or will refuse blood transfusions.
- Gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the prior 3 months, or major surgery within 2 months.
- Current known current platelet count \<100,000 cells/mm3 or Hgb \<10 g/dL.
- Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy \<1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment).
- Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period.
- Patients with EF\<30%.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Seung-Jung Parklead
- CardioVascular Research Foundation, Koreacollaborator
Study Sites (15)
Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital
Bucheon-si, South Korea
Choeng Ju St.Mary's Hospital
Choeng Ju, South Korea
Kangwon National University Hospital
Chuncheon, South Korea
Chungnam National University Hospital
Daejeon, South Korea
Asan Medical Center
Gangneung, South Korea
DongGuk University Gyongju Hospital
Gyongju, South Korea
Chonbuk National University Hospital
Jeonju, South Korea
Kwangju Christian Hospital
Kwangju, South Korea
Inje University Pusan Paik Hospital
Pusan, South Korea
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital,
Pyeongchon, South Korea
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 138-736, South Korea
Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Kyungsang University Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Seoul Veterans Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Ulsan University Hospital
Ulsan, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD
Department of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD,PhD, Chairman,Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center,University of Ulsan,College of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2007
First Posted
June 12, 2007
Study Start
March 1, 2007
Primary Completion
March 1, 2011
Study Completion
March 1, 2011
Last Updated
August 8, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-08