Microcirculation Guided Therapy Versus "Standard Treatment" of Severe Sepsis
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to asses the recovery of organ failure between two resuscitation protocols in severe sepsis: standard, pressure guided therapy versus a microcirculation guided therapy
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 6, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 8, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedJanuary 22, 2008
January 1, 2008
1.5 years
June 6, 2007
January 17, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score during the first 72 hours of treatment for severe sepsis
72 hours
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Severity, decrease and duration of organ failure over the complete ICU stay
complete icu stay
Duration of organ support
during ICU treatment
ICU and hospital length of stay
hospital stay
ICU and hospital mortality
hospital stay
Inflammatory response measured by IL-6/IL-10
72 hours
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 18 years or older
- admission to the intensive care unit with severe sepsis, defined in according with a modification of the American College of Chest Physician/SCCM guidelines criteria
- intention to provide full intensive care treatment for at least 72 hours and
- written informed consent to be obtained from patient or next of kin.
You may not qualify if:
- haematologic malignancy
- metastatic malignancy
- AIDS with CD4 \< 50 cells/mm3
- liver cirrhosis Child Pugh B \& C
- pregnancy
- post resuscitation with GCS \< 8 of 15 and treatment with induced hypothermia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, intensive care
Amsterdam, 1090 HM, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
van der Voort PH, van Zanten M, Bosman RJ, van Stijn I, Wester JP, van Raalte R, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Zandstra DF. Testing a conceptual model on early opening of the microcirculation in severe sepsis and septic shock: a randomised controlled pilot study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Mar;32(3):189-98. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000126.
PMID: 25032942DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rutger v Raalte, MD
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, intensive care unit
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 6, 2007
First Posted
June 8, 2007
Study Start
June 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
January 22, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-01