Study Stopped
concern patients in oral cleaout arm had worse outcome
Comparison Trial of Enema vs. PEG 3350 for Constipation
Randomized Clinical Trial of Milk and Molasses Enema vs. PEG 3350 for Fecal Impaction in Childhood Constipation
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if milk and molasses enema or PEG 3350 works better for treatment of fecal impaction in children who are constipated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2006
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 2, 2020
CompletedNovember 2, 2020
October 1, 2020
2.4 years
April 26, 2007
August 19, 2020
October 9, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Number of Participants With Main Symptom Improvement
On day 5, the number of participants who respond "improved" to the question "Has your child's main symptom improved, stayed the same or gotten worse?"
5 days
Study Arms (2)
enema
ACTIVE COMPARATORRectal enema containing mixture of milk and molasses
PEG 3350
ACTIVE COMPARATORMedication to be taken orally once each day for three consecutive days
Interventions
PEG 3350 1.5 gram/kg for disimpaction then 0.8 gram/kg for maintenance
enema 10 cc/kg per rectum (max 500 cc)then PEG 3350 0.8 gram/kg for maintenance
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Constipated children who have one of the following three conditions:
- Fecal impaction (lower quadrant mass or dilated rectum with hard stool),
- Functional fecal retention (large diameter stools as determined by caregiver \<twice/week and retentive behaviors, or
- Excessive stool in colon on abdominal radiograph as determined by attending radiologist or treating physician
You may not qualify if:
- Ill appearing patients (signs of acute surgical abdomen, abnormal vital signs, or overall ill appearing as determined by treating physician)
- Patients whose evaluation in the ED includes more than plain radiographs or urinalysis
- Patients who receive analgesia for the abdominal pain in the ED (except acetaminophen or ibuprofen)
- Non-English speaking patients and families
- Patients with milk allergy
- Patients with molasses allergy
- Patients who are pregnant
- Patients with a chronic medical conditions which may be associated with constipation (including patients with cystic fibrosis, cerebral palsy, hypothyroidism, spinal anomalies, and known gastrointestinal anatomic abnormalities) or a history of prior abdominal or rectal surgery
- Patients who are admitted to an in-patient unit
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Children's Mercy Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
More than half of patients who were approached declined participation. A moderate number of patients (29%) were lost to follow-up.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Melissa Miller MD
- Organization
- Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Melissa K Miller, MD
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2007
First Posted
April 30, 2007
Study Start
December 1, 2006
Primary Completion
May 1, 2009
Study Completion
May 1, 2009
Last Updated
November 2, 2020
Results First Posted
November 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10