Use of Spinal Sealant System During Spinal Surgery
A Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Spinal Sealant System as an Adjunct to Sutured Dural Repair With Standard of Care Methods During Spinal Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
3
1 country
1
Brief Summary
- 1.To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Spinal Sealant as an adjunct to sutured dural repair compared with standard of care methods (control) to obtain watertight dural closure intraoperatively in patients undergoing spinal surgery.
- 2.To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Spinal Sealant as an adjunct to sutured dural repair compared with standard of care methods (control) to obtain watertight dural closure in patients undergoing spinal surgery up to 90 days post-procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jan 2006
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 10, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedOctober 12, 2011
October 1, 2011
1.8 years
March 29, 2007
October 10, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent (%) success obtaining watertight closure following assigned treatment (Spinal Sealant or control)
Percentage (%) success in obtaining a watertight closure following assigned treatment (Spinal Sealant or control) defined as either Success (A watertight closure of the dural repair intra-operatively after assigned treatment, confirmed by Valsalva maneuver at 20-25 cm H2O for 10-15 seconds); or Failure (A non-watertight closure of the dural repair intra-operatively after assigned treatment, confirmed by Valsalva maneuver at 20-25 cm H2O for 10-15 seconds). This will be determined intraoperatively.
Determination in course of surgery with up to 90 day post operative follow-up.
Study Arms (2)
Spinal Sealant
EXPERIMENTALDural repair with the Spinal Sealant System.
Standard Methods
ACTIVE COMPARATORDural repair with standard methods such as the closing of the dura with stitches.
Interventions
Spinal Sealant System which will be sprayed over the stitches to close the opening in the dura.
Standard methods such as the closing of the dura with stitches.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is between 18 and 75 years of age.
- Patient is scheduled for a spinal procedure that entails a dural incision.
- Patient requires a procedure involving surgical wound classification Class I/Clean (per CDC criteria).
- Patient, or authorized representative, has been informed of the nature of the study, and has provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the respective clinical site.
- Intraoperative Criteria: Presence of non-watertight closure, either spontaneously or upon Valsalva maneuver to 20-25 cm H20 for 5-10 seconds.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has active spinal and/or systemic infection.
- Patient will require additional spine surgery within the study time period.
- Patient has had a previous spinal surgery involving dural exposure and/or entry at the same level(s) as the study procedure.
- Patient has pre-existing external lumbar CSF drain or internal CSF shunt.
- Patient is participating in a clinical trial of another investigational device or drug.
- Patient with creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dL.
- Patient with total bilirubin \> 2.5 mg/dL.
- Pregnant or breast-feeding females or females who wish to become pregnant during the length of study participation.
- Patient has been treated with chronic steroid therapy unless discontinued more than 6 weeks prior to surgery (standard perioperative steroids are permitted). For purposes of this protocol, chronic steroid therapy is defined as greater than 4 weeks.
- Patient has documented history of significant coagulopathy with a PTT \> 35 sec, PT/ INR \>1.2, receiving aspirin, or NSAIDS at the time of surgery. Note: Patients who are receiving cardiovascular prophylaxis are not excluded.
- Patient is receiving warfarin or heparin at the time of surgery (including analogs).
- Patient has a diagnosed and documented compromised immune system and/or autoimmune disease.
- Patient has had chemotherapy treatment within 6 months prior to, or planned during the study (until completion of last follow-up evaluation).
- Patient has had prior radiation treatment to the surgical site or has planned radiation therapy within 30 days post procedure.
- Patient has a known malignancy or another condition with prognosis shorter than 6 months.
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Centerlead
- Confluent Surgicalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ian E. McCutcheon, MD
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2007
First Posted
April 10, 2007
Study Start
January 1, 2006
Primary Completion
November 1, 2007
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
October 12, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-10