Early Hospital Discharge or Standard Inpatient Care in Cancer Patients Receiving Antibiotics for Febrile Neutropenia
A Prospective Randomised Phase III Trial of Early Hospital Discharge Versus Standard Inpatient Management of Cancer Patients With Low-Risk Febrile Neutropenia Receiving Oral Antibiotics. Oral Antibiotics for Neutropenic Sepsis Giving Early Hospital Discharge [ORANGE]
5 other identifiers
interventional
400
1 country
10
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Finishing an antibiotic regimen at home may be as effective as receiving it in the hospital. It is not yet known whether early hospital discharge is as effective as standard inpatient care in cancer patients receiving antibiotics for febrile neutropenia. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying early hospital discharge and comparing it with standard inpatient care in cancer patients receiving antibiotics for febrile neutropenia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2010
CompletedAugust 12, 2013
May 1, 2007
3 years
March 7, 2007
August 9, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Total number of days of hospitalization (including unplanned readmission) (randomized patients)
Incidence of serious adverse events (randomized and registered patients)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Incidence of treatment failure as defined by the necessity for change in antibiotic therapy (randomized and registered patients)
Incidence of unplanned readmissions (randomized patients)
Patient acceptability of randomized discharge policy as measured by Health Questionnaire, Cancer Worries Inventory Booklet, and Patient Daily Diary (randomized patients)
Toxicity attributed to oral antibiotic therapy as measured by NCI CTCAE v3.0 (randomized and registered patients)
Health service costs (randomized patients)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Gloucestershire Oncology Centre at Cheltenham General Hospital
Cheltenham, England, GL53 7AN, United Kingdom
Princess Royal Hospital at Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust
Hull, England, HU8 9HE, United Kingdom
Leicester Royal Infirmary
Leicester, England, LE1 5WW, United Kingdom
Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology
Merseyside, England, CH63 4JY, United Kingdom
Northampton General Hospital
Northampton, England, NN1 5BD, United Kingdom
Peterborough Hospitals Trust
Peterborough, England, PE3 6DA, United Kingdom
Cancer Research Centre at Weston Park Hospital
Sheffield, England, S1O 2SJ, United Kingdom
Airedale General Hospital
West Yorkshire, England, BD20 6TD, United Kingdom
Western Infirmary
Glasgow, Scotland, G11 6NT, United Kingdom
Ysbyty Gwynedd
Bangor, Wales, LL57 2PW, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ernest Marshall, MD
Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2007
First Posted
March 9, 2007
Study Start
July 1, 2007
Primary Completion
July 1, 2010
Last Updated
August 12, 2013
Record last verified: 2007-05