Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical ELA-Max for Anesthesia Prior to Intravenous (IV) Catheterization in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This trial is a comparison of the anesthetic effectiveness of J-Tip needle-free jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine to the anesthetic effectiveness of topical 4% ELA-Max for peripheral intravenous catheter (PIV) insertion. The researchers hypothesize that the jet injection of lidocaine will provide superior anesthesia to the ELA-Max prior to PIV insertion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 pain
Started Apr 2005
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2007
CompletedMarch 8, 2007
March 1, 2007
March 7, 2007
March 7, 2007
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
VAS pain scores for the PIV insertion as judged by the patients and the blinded observer.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Secondary outcome measures included patient and blinded observer VAS scores for pain of jet injection, patient and blinded observer scores for anxiety of PIV insertion, nursing satisfaction of placing the PIV with jet injection or ELA-Maxâ, nursing diffi
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Between the ages of 8-15 years requiring a PIV as part of their management in the emergency department.
You may not qualify if:
- Excluded from the study if they reported use of analgesic medication within 6 hours of enrollment,
- Had a Glasgow Coma Score \< 15,
- A baseline screening VAS pain score \> 20 mm, or
- A history of skin hypersensitivity or lidocaine allergy,
- Were incapable of self-reporting a pain score,
- Had a known neurological condition that alters pain perception,
- Had methemoglobinemia, or
- Did not speak or understand English.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kosair Children's Hospital
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
Related Publications (1)
Spanos S, Booth R, Koenig H, Sikes K, Gracely E, Kim IK. Jet Injection of 1% buffered lidocaine versus topical ELA-Max for anesthesia before peripheral intravenous catheterization in children: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Aug;24(8):511-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31816a8d5b.
PMID: 18645542DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
In K Kim, MD
Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Kosair Children's Hospital, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2007
First Posted
March 8, 2007
Study Start
April 1, 2005
Study Completion
April 1, 2006
Last Updated
March 8, 2007
Record last verified: 2007-03