EEG Monitoring to Assess Emergence From Neuroanesthesia
A Comparison of the EEGo and BIS Monitors to Assess Emergence From Neuroanesthesia
A Comparison of the EEGo and BIS Monitors to Assess Emergence From Neuroanesthesia
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Study Start
August 2007
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
March 2008
Actual (reported)Study Completion
March 2008
Actual (reported)A highly desired result in neuroanesthesia is a prompt, controlled emergence following a neurosurgical procedure. Considerable strides have been made in this direction with volatile anesthetic agents such as sevoflurane or desflurane administered in association with the narcotic remifentanil. It is characteristic that patients will emerge within 5 to 10 minutes of cessation of these agents at the end of a neuroanesthetic. However, there are cases where emergence is delayed, especially after periods of deep anesthesia for i) cerebral protection with temporary clipping of cerebral aneurysms and ii) with microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Deep levels of anesthesia are standard for these procedures in the posterior fossa, which utilize motor evoked potentials to assess cranial nerve function. In these cases, EEG monitoring is standard. Using the EEG to monitor emergence to aid its progress makes sense. A monitor which could predict emergence in these patients would be valuable. EEG monitoring engineered to provide this information is now available in the form of the EEGo. This study is designed to test the hypothesis that the EEGo monitor will be superior to the BIS monitor to assess emergence following neuroanesthesia.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
March 2008
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
March 5, 2007
Actual (reported)March 6, 2007
Actual (reported)August 2007
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
March 2008
Actual (reported)March 2008
Actual (reported)An assessment of quality of emergence - smooth, single cough, multiple coughs will be provided by the neurosurgeon
Wake up time in OR
Twenty-four hours post surgery a directed survey of patient satisfaction and questioning regarding awareness will be done
hours
Comparison of 2 ways of processing the EEG signal
comparison of two processed EEG monitors.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Health Sciences Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9, Canada
W. Alan C. Mutch, MD
University of Manitoba
21 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
March 5, 2007
First Posted
March 6, 2007
Study Start
August 2007
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Research Study to Test Safety and Effectiveness of Investigational Drug in Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
March 2008
Actual (reported)Study Completion
March 2008
Actual (reported)Last Updated
April 16, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-04
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: