EEG Monitoring to Assess Emergence From Neuroanesthesia
A Comparison of the EEGo and BIS Monitors to Assess Emergence From Neuroanesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A highly desired result in neuroanesthesia is a prompt, controlled emergence following a neurosurgical procedure. Considerable strides have been made in this direction with volatile anesthetic agents such as sevoflurane or desflurane administered in association with the narcotic remifentanil. It is characteristic that patients will emerge within 5 to 10 minutes of cessation of these agents at the end of a neuroanesthetic. However, there are cases where emergence is delayed, especially after periods of deep anesthesia for i) cerebral protection with temporary clipping of cerebral aneurysms and ii) with microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Deep levels of anesthesia are standard for these procedures in the posterior fossa, which utilize motor evoked potentials to assess cranial nerve function. In these cases, EEG monitoring is standard. Using the EEG to monitor emergence to aid its progress makes sense. A monitor which could predict emergence in these patients would be valuable. EEG monitoring engineered to provide this information is now available in the form of the EEGo. This study is designed to test the hypothesis that the EEGo monitor will be superior to the BIS monitor to assess emergence following neuroanesthesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2007
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2008
CompletedApril 16, 2008
April 1, 2008
7 months
March 5, 2007
April 15, 2008
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
An assessment of quality of emergence - smooth, single cough, multiple coughs will be provided by the neurosurgeon
Wake up time in OR
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Twenty-four hours post surgery a directed survey of patient satisfaction and questioning regarding awareness will be done
hours
Interventions
Comparison of 2 ways of processing the EEG signal
comparison of two processed EEG monitors.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All adult patients undergoing neurosurgery where intraoperative EEG monitoring is the standard of care will be approached in the Pre-Anesthetic Clinic for participation.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal
- a history of asthma requiring routine use of bronchodilators, because the study will use desflurane as the volatile agent
- pregnancy
- non-elective aneurysm clipping
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Health Sciences Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
W. Alan C. Mutch, MD
University of Manitoba
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2007
First Posted
March 6, 2007
Study Start
August 1, 2007
Primary Completion
March 1, 2008
Study Completion
March 1, 2008
Last Updated
April 16, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-04