NCT01943591

Brief Summary

Endovascular treatment with platinum coils is safe and effective in preventing rebleeding of intracranial aneurysms. Unfortunately, endovascular treatment of aneurysms with coils has been associated with incomplete occlusion at initial treatment (remnant) or at follow-up (recurrence). This in some studies has been as high as 20%. While many such aneurysm remnants or recurrences exhibit benign behavior, many require retreatment to prevent future hemorrhage. A recent randomized controlled trial of aneurysm coiling revealed that aneurysms between 2 and 9.9 mm diameter were more likely to have an improved angiographic and composite clinical outcome when treated with hydrogel-coated coils, an improvement inferred to result from higher packing density afforded by hydrogel expansion(1). The use of hydrogel coils is associated with technical difficulties related to expansion and limited time for deployment. The investigators theorize that similar results could be achieved by using more voluminous bare platinum coils, leading to improved packing density compared to smaller caliber coils, and thus result in lower incidence of remnants or residuals. The relationship between packing densities and composite clinical endpoints having never been shown in a robust fashion, the investigators therefore propose a randomized clinical trial opposing coiling with soft 15-caliber coils to 10-caliber bare platinum coils in aneurysms varying in size from 3 to 9.9 mm. To test the hypothesis that 15-caliber coiling systems are superior to standard 10-caliber coils in achieving better composite outcomes, the investigators propose the DELTA trial: Does Embolization with Larger coils lead to better Treatment of Aneurysms trial, a randomized controlled blinded trial with 2 subgroups of 282 patients each, 564 total: Subgroup 1: Coiled with a maximum proportion of 15-caliber coils as conditions allow Subgroup 2: Coiled with 10-caliber coils.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
210

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

15 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 12, 2013

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 17, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 13, 2013

Completed
5.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 5, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 5, 2018

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 22, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

January 22, 2020

Status Verified

December 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

5.1 years

First QC Date

September 12, 2013

Results QC Date

January 9, 2020

Last Update Submit

January 9, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

treatment trialcerebral aneurysmrandomizedcoilsendovascularAneurysmIntracranial AneurysmVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesIntracranial Arterial DiseasesCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Major Recurrence of Lesion or Presence of Residual Aneurysm

    Major radiographic recurrence of the lesion or the presence of a 'residual aneurysm' as judged by core lab

    1 year

  • Hemorrhage During the Follow-up Period

    Post-treatment hemorrhage experienced during follow-up period.

    Within 1 year following coiling

  • Retreatment of the Same Lesion by Endovascular or Surgical Means

    Retreatment of the same lesion by endovascular or surgical means during the follow-up period

    Within 1 year following coiling

  • Initial Treatment Failure

    Inability to treat aneurysm, either because access to aneurysm is difficult or technical issues.

    Within 1 year following coiling

  • Related Morbidity

    Morbidity that precludes follow up

    Within 1 year following coiling

  • Related Mortality

    Mortality that precludes follow up

    Within 1 year following coiling

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Packing Density

    within the first 3 days after coiling

  • Procedural Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Within 6 months following coiling

  • Modified Rankin Score (mRS) Greater Than 2

    at 1 year follow-up

Study Arms (2)

15-caliber platinum coils

EXPERIMENTAL

Endovascular embolization coiling using 15-caliber platinum coils

Device: Endovascular coiling with standard 10-caliber platinum coils or 15-caliber platinum coils

10-caliber coils

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Endovascular embolization coiling using standard 10-caliber platinum coils

Device: Endovascular coiling with standard 10-caliber platinum coils or 15-caliber platinum coils

Interventions

Embolization using 15-caliber platinum coils or standard 10-caliber platinum coils.

10-caliber coils15-caliber platinum coils

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • At least one ruptured or unruptured aneurysms with a dimension ≥ 10 mm (longest axis)
  • for ruptured lesions, patients should be in World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade \< IV.
  • The anatomy of the lesion is such that endovascular treatment is possible with both types of coils (not necessarily certain or probable)
  • Patient is 18 or older
  • Life expectancy is more than 2 years (able to complete follow-up)

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with planned treatment of an associated cerebral arteriovenous malformations
  • When parent vessel occlusion, without simultaneous endosaccular coiling of the aneurysm, is the primary intent of the procedure
  • Any absolute contraindication to endovascular treatment, angiography, or anaesthesia such as severe allergies to contrast or medications

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (15)

University of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

University of Massachusetts Medical School

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Stony Brook University Medical Center (SUNY)

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Location

SUNY Upstate Medical University

Syracuse, New York, United States

Location

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Location

University of Tennessee Medical Center

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Location

University of Virginia Health System

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Location

West Virginia University Hospital

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Location

Foothills Medical Center

Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada

Location

University of Alberta Hospital

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Location

Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre

Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3A7, Canada

Location

McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Location

Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada

Location

Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada

Location

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0C1, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • White PM, Lewis SC, Gholkar A, Sellar RJ, Nahser H, Cognard C, Forrester L, Wardlaw JM; HELPS trial collaborators. Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 May 14;377(9778):1655-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60408-X.

    PMID: 21571149BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Intracranial AneurysmAneurysmVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesIntracranial Arterial DiseasesCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

Trial was stopped before target number of patients were recruited due to funding being interrupted. Premature interruption of the trial does not allow a conclusion regarding the primary hypothesis.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Jean Raymond
Organization
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Research Centre

Study Officials

  • Jean Raymond, MD

    Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2013

First Posted

September 17, 2013

Study Start

November 13, 2013

Primary Completion

December 5, 2018

Study Completion

December 5, 2018

Last Updated

January 22, 2020

Results First Posted

January 22, 2020

Record last verified: 2018-12

Locations