Cotrimoxazole Versus Vancomycin for Invasive Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infections
Treatment With Cotrimoxazole vs. Vancomycin for Infections Caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus: Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
252
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is a major pathogen causing mainly health-care associated infections and, lately, also community acquired infections. Few treatment choices exist to treat these infections. The currently recommended antibiotics for these infections are glycopeptides (vancomycin or teicoplanin). Glycopeptide treatment hs several disadvantages. It is a last resort antibiotic family that should be reserved for the future; Vancomycin is less effective that beta-lactam drugs for SA infections susceptible to both agents; treatment can only be given intravenously; and use of vancomycin has led to the development of SA strains with partial or complete resistance to vancomycin. Cotrimoxazole is an old antibiotic active against most strains of MRSA, depending on local epidemiology. Study hypothesis: The purpose of this study is to show that cotrimoxazole is as effective as treatment with vancomycin for invasive MRSA infections. We plan a randomized controlled trial comparing treatment with cotrimoxazole vs. vancomycin for invasive MRSA infections. The primary efficacy outcome we will assess will be Improvement or cure with or without antibiotic modifications, defined as: survival at 7 days post randomization with resolution of fever (\<38 for two consecutive days) and resolution of hypotension (\>90 systolic without need for vasopressor support); and physician's assessment that the primary infection was improved or cured. The primary safety outcome will be all-cause 30-day survival.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Jun 2007
Longer than P75 for phase_3
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 26, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedSeptember 25, 2015
September 1, 2015
6.9 years
January 24, 2007
September 23, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Primary efficacy: Improved or cure with or without antibiotic modifications, defined as: survival at 7 days post randomization with resolution of fever and resolution of hypotension
7 days
Primary safety: 30-day all cause mortality
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Improved or cure without antibiotic modifications
7 days
Modification of the anti-staphylococcal treatment within 1 week of treatment onset for perceived failure of therapy
7 days
Survival at 7 days post randomization without the need for modification of the anti-staphylococcal antibiotic
7 days
Bacteriological failure, defined as persistent isolation of Staphylococcus aureus with the same phenotype 7 days after or more after treatment onset
7 days
Need for surgical intervention or other invasive procedures
30 days
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
A
EXPERIMENTALCotrimoxazole
B
ACTIVE COMPARATORVancomycin
Interventions
Cotrimoxazole arm: intravenous cotrimoxazole 4 amp (320 mg trimethoprim/ 1600 mg sulfamethoxazole) diluted in 500 ml D5W or N.S. Q 12 hours. Patients intolerant of volume overload will be given the same dose in 250ml D5W (as in the current recommendations used in the hospital). The dose was selected basing on the existing randomized controlled trial and a pharmacokinetic study . 21 For patients with GFR\< 30 the dosage interval will be increased to 4 amp (320 mg trimethoprim/ 1600 mg sulfamethoxazole) diluted in 500 ml D5W or N.S. Q 24 hours. 22 Patients on peritoneal dialysis will be given 2 amp (160 mg trimethoprim/ 800 mg sulfamethoxazole) Q 48 hours. Patients with acute renal failure treated with hemodialysis will be given the 2 amp (160 mg trimethoprim/ 800 mg sulfamethoxazole) after dialysis. Patients on continuous hemofiltration for acute renal failure will be administered the dose for GFR\<30.
intravenous vancomycin 1gr Q 12 hours. Adjustment to creatinine clearance: GFR 10-50 1 gr Q 24-96 hours, GFR \<10 1gr Q 4-7 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults \>18 years
- providing signed informed consent or, if unable, having a legal guardian or a caretaker that will sign informed consent
- Patients with documented MRSA infections:
- MRSA bacteremia
- Other microbiologically documented MRSA infections defined as a clinical source of infection (CDC criteria) plus microbiological documentation of MRSA from the source of infection
- Patients with highly probable MRSA infections, prior to microbiological documentation of the pathogen:
- Suspected neurosurgical meningitis (including VP-shunt meningitis)
- Sepsis during hemodialysis
- Ventilator-associated pneumonia with prior antibiotic treatment within 48 hours
- Catheter-related or suspected catheter-related infections
- Surgical site infection in the presence of a foreign body
You may not qualify if:
- Previous antibiotic treatment directed against MRSA \>48 hours (including vancomycin, fucidic acid, rifampicin or cotrimoxazole)
- Known allergy to either study drug
- Acute leukemia and/ or BMT with neutropenia \<500/mm3 or \<1000/mm3 and expected to decrease below 500/mm3
- Pregnancy, lactation
- Previous enrollment in this study
- Concurrent participation in another trial
- Documented Staphylococcal infection resistant to cotrimoxazole or VISA or VRSA
- Documented MSSA
- Documented left-sided endocarditis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Rambam Health Care Campus
Haifa, Israel
Rabin Medical Center; Beilinson Hospital and Davidoff Cancer Center
Petah Tikva, 49100, Israel
Related Publications (1)
Paul M, Bishara J, Yahav D, Goldberg E, Neuberger A, Ghanem-Zoubi N, Dickstein Y, Nseir W, Dan M, Leibovici L. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus vancomycin for severe infections caused by meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2015 May 14;350:h2219. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2219.
PMID: 25977146DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mical Paul, MD
Rabin Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jihad Bishara, MD
Rabin Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2007
First Posted
January 26, 2007
Study Start
June 1, 2007
Primary Completion
May 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 25, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-09