Interactive Voice Response (IVR) Symptom Assessment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients
Using an Interactive Voice Response Telephone System in the Assessment and Management of Symptoms in Advanced Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Primary Objectives:
- To compare the effectiveness of an interactive voice response (IVR) telephone triage/feedback system versus an interactive voice response telephone system with assessment only in monitoring and managing symptoms in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- To compare differences in mood and quality of life variables of patients using the IVR triage/feedback system versus IVR assessment only.
- To compare the healthcare utilization (emergency visits, admissions, length of stay for hospitalizations for uncontrolled symptoms) of patients using the IVR triage/feedback system versus IVR assessment only.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable lung-cancer
Started Apr 2003
Longer than P75 for not_applicable lung-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 18, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 16, 2011
CompletedDecember 16, 2011
November 1, 2011
7.8 years
January 16, 2007
September 8, 2011
November 14, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ratio of Number of Alerts Generated by Symptom Distress Over the Number of Available Assessments
Total number of alerts generated by symptom exceeding prespecified threshold for 7 symptoms - pain, fatigue, nausea, cough, constipation, vomiting and shortness of breath (Ratio alerts/number of assessments using IVR telephone triage/feedback versus IVR only). Reporting 0-10 severity scale of MD Anderson Symptom Inventory from 0 (symptom not present) to 10 (symptom bad as imagine it could be). Thresholds set at 4 on scale for all symptoms except shortness of breath and constipation where threshold set at 2. More than one symptom alert may appear per assessment causing ratio values to exceed 1.
Baseline to end of first chemotherapy cycle (generally chemotherapy and 1 assessment of response within 6-8 weeks)
Study Arms (2)
IVR Assessment Plus Triage
EXPERIMENTALInteractive Voice Response Telephone System (IVR) Plus Triage (Participants report symptoms to telephone system and doctor/nurse notified when symptom is severe) + Questionnaire
IVR Assessment Only
EXPERIMENTALIVR (Phone calls twice weekly) + Questionnaire
Interventions
Questionnaires taking about 30-45 minutes to complete.
IVR Only = Phone calls twice weekly, each call lasting less than 5 minutes.
IVR system will "triage," or sort, the symptom data by symptom severity, notifying health care professionals when a symptom is greater than the set threshold limit.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients diagnosed with stage III or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (Patients who have received other prior chemotherapy are eligible.)
- years of age or older
- English-speaking
- Lives in the United States
- Adequate vision and hearing to use the Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system
- Provides written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Current diagnosis of psychosis or dementia
- Patients unable to complete the assessment measures or unable to understand the purpose of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Charles S Cleeland, PhD, Professor
- Organization
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charles Cleeland, PhD
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2007
First Posted
January 18, 2007
Study Start
April 1, 2003
Primary Completion
February 1, 2011
Study Completion
February 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 16, 2011
Results First Posted
December 16, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-11