Flexible GnRH Antagonist vs Flare up GnRH Agonist Protocol in Poor Responders
The Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol Provides Better Results (IVF Outcomes) Than Flare up GnRH Agonist Protocol in Poor Responders
1 other identifier
interventional
270
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare ovulation induction using a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol and flare up GnRH agonist protocol in IVF patients with poor response to ovarian stimulation. Our hypothesis is that the antagonist protocol provides better IVF outcomes compared to the flare up protocol in this group of patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Sep 2003
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2003
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 22, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2006
CompletedDecember 16, 2013
January 1, 2009
December 22, 2006
December 13, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ongoing pregnancy rate per embryo transfer
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Duration of ovarian stimulation, total rFSH used, estradiol, LH and progesterone concentration on hCG day.
Number of mature oocytes retrieved.
Number of fertilised oocytes.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- regular menstrual cycle
- or more failed IVF attempts with poor response
- or fewer oocytes retrieved
- FSH\>12 IU/l on day 3
You may not qualify if:
- PCOS
- Normal responders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Eugonialead
Study Sites (1)
Eugonia
Athens, 11528, Greece
Related Publications (2)
Tarlatzis BC, Zepiridis L, Grimbizis G, Bontis J. Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2003 Jan-Feb;9(1):61-76. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmg007.
PMID: 12638782BACKGROUNDLainas TG, Sfontouris IA, Papanikolaou EG, Zorzovilis JZ, Petsas GK, Lainas GT, Kolibianakis EM. Flexible GnRH antagonist versus flare-up GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders treated by IVF: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2008 Jun;23(6):1355-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den107. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
PMID: 18403419DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Tryfon Lainas, PhD
Eugonia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2006
First Posted
December 29, 2006
Study Start
September 1, 2003
Study Completion
July 1, 2006
Last Updated
December 16, 2013
Record last verified: 2009-01