Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of CosmetaLife™ for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of CosmetaLife™ Versus Control for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
1 other identifier
interventional
145
1 country
5
Brief Summary
This is a randomized, double-blind pivotal study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of CosmetaLife injectable dermal filler for the correction of wrinkles and folds, such as nasolabial folds (i.e., smile lines).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Oct 2006
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 20, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 10, 2011
CompletedJune 27, 2011
June 1, 2011
11 months
December 20, 2006
March 4, 2011
June 22, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale
To determine if the mean change in the 5-point Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) score at 6 months was non-inferior to the contralateral Control Restylane treated side, where on this 5-point scale 1 has no measurable nasolabial fold, 2 has some fold, 3 has moderate fold, 4 has heavier moderate fold, and a 5 has deep to a very deep nasolabial fold. For this study only moderate nasolabial folds were included (i.e., 3 or 4), where subjects scored as 5 were excluded.
baseline and 6 months
Adverse Event Reporting
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Safety and Effectiveness of CosmetaLife at 3, 9 and 12 Months
3, 9 and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
CosmetaLife
EXPERIMENTALTest Article was given at start and two week follow up if necessary, up to a maximum dose of 2 cc to achieve optimal correction as determined by investigator.
Restylane
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl Article was given at start and two week follow up if necessary, up to a maximum dose of 2 cc to achieve optimal correction as determined by investigator.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients 18 years of age or older
- Patients with moderate nasolabial folds (3-4 WSRS scale)
- Patients willing to provide written informed consent for their participation in the study
- Patients willing to abstain from other facial cosmetic procedures through the 12 month follow-up visit
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with any aesthetic facial therapy within 6 months prior to
- Patients with an any reaction to the skin test
- Patients with a history of autoimmune disorder, lidocaine reactions, allergy to heparin, other severe or chronic allergies
- Patients with a current disease state that can effect the immunoresponse, or patients on immunosuppressive therapy
- Patients with an active infection of any kind, skin disease, connective tissue disorder
- Patients who are pregnant or lactating
- Patients enrolled in another investigational clinical trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cosmetalead
- Cosmeta Corp, A Gel-Del Technologies Companycollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Beauty Renewed
Tracy, California, 95376, United States
North Atlantic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Roswell, Georgia, 30076, United States
SkinCare Physicians of Chestnut Hill
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, 02467, United States
Cosmetic Care Center, LLC
Edina, Minnesota, 55424, United States
Minnesota Clinical Study Center
Fridley, Minnesota, 55432, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. David B. Masters
- Organization
- Cosmeta, A Gel-Del Technolgies Company
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
David B. Masters, Ph.D.
Cosmeta™ Corp
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 20, 2006
First Posted
December 21, 2006
Study Start
October 1, 2006
Primary Completion
September 1, 2007
Study Completion
March 1, 2008
Last Updated
June 27, 2011
Results First Posted
June 10, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-06