NCT00413582

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to scientifically evaluate two different management strategies for post-operative pain after pectus excavatum repair. The hypothesis is that pain management without an epidural decreases hospital stay without compromising comfort. The primary outcome variable is length of hospitalization after the intervention.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
110

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2006

Longer than P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2006

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 18, 2006

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 20, 2006

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2010

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2010

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 16, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

January 16, 2012

Status Verified

December 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

December 18, 2006

Results QC Date

December 12, 2011

Last Update Submit

December 12, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

Pectus ExcavatumBar RepairPain ControlPectus Excavatum Repair

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Length of Hospitalization

    1 week

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Time in the Operating Room

    1 week

Study Arms (2)

1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Epidural analgesia

Drug: Epidural Analgesia

2

EXPERIMENTAL

IV narcotic analgesia

Drug: Patient-Controlled IV Analgesia

Interventions

Upon arrival to the operating room, patients will have a thoracic epidural (T 6-9) placed while in the sitting position. All epidural catheters will be inserted 3-5 cm within the epidural space and will be placed by attending anesthesiologists. Patients will receive midazolam 0.025 - 0.05 mg/kg IV (max 5mg) and/or fentanyl 0.5 - 2 mcg/kg IV for comfort during the procedure. Once the epidural is placed, the patient will be positioned for surgery. The epidural catheter will be initially bolused with 0.3ml/kg of ropivacaine 0.10% (max 10 ml), fentanyl 1 - 1.2 mcg/kg and clonidine 1.8 - 2mcg/kg. An infusion of ropivacaine 0.10%, fentanyl 2mcg/ml and clonidine 1.5mcg/ml will be initiated immediately at the rate of 0.3ml/kg/hr (max 10ml/hr). Intraoperatively, patients will receive intravenous fentanyl if indicated.

1

In the PCA arm, patients will receive fentanyl (3-6 mcg/kg) at anesthesia induction. Additional fentanyl may be administered intraoperatively as indicated. Patients who are \> 35 Kg. (in keeping with current FDA approved labeling) will receive a clonidine 0.1 mg/day transdermal patch to the deltoid immediately after induction of anesthesia. Subjects in the epidural arm also receive clonidine. Upon arrival to the post anesthesia care unit, patients will be placed on a patient controlled analgesic (PCA) pump (hydromorphone: loading dose if needed; 5-6 mcg/kg continuous infusion; 5-6 mcg/kg six minute demand dose). An additional hydromorphone dose (8mcg/kg) will be available every 2 hours for pain scores of \> 4/10 throughout the duration of PCA use.

2

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing a pectus excavatum repair with bar placement.

You may not qualify if:

  • Open repair
  • Re-Do operation
  • Known allergy to a pain medication in the protocol
  • Existing contraindications to epidural catheter placement
  • Requirement for 2 bars to be placed (rare)
  • Inadequate baseline cognitive function to understand/respond to VAS questionnaire

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Children's Mercy Hospital

Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, PostoperativeFunnel ChestAgnosia

Interventions

Analgesia, Epidural

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsBone Diseases, DevelopmentalBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMusculoskeletal AbnormalitiesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnalgesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Results Point of Contact

Title
Shawn D. St. Peter, MD
Organization
Children's Mercy Hospital

Study Officials

  • Shawn D St. Peter, MD

    Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2006

First Posted

December 20, 2006

Study Start

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion

May 1, 2010

Study Completion

October 1, 2010

Last Updated

January 16, 2012

Results First Posted

January 16, 2012

Record last verified: 2011-12

Locations