A Prospective Randomized Trial Using Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis of the Advance Medial Pivot Knee
1 other identifier
interventional
80
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether this particular knee replacement is better than those already on the market. By participation, it will further refine the design of future total knee replacements and perhaps increase longevity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2001
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2001
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 28, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 30, 2006
CompletedAugust 12, 2010
August 1, 2010
3.9 years
November 28, 2006
August 11, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
tibial implant micromotion relative to tibia at 2 years
2 years postoperative
Study Arms (2)
Medial Pivot
ACTIVE COMPARATORPosterior Stabilized
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
medial pivot total knee arthroplasty tibial component vs standard posterior stabilized tibial component with post. Medial pivot provides a constrained medial condyle through shape of polyethylene and reduces amount of bone removal on femoral side that would otherwise be removed to accommodate PS post
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary osteoarthritis of the knee
- Mono-articular disease (Charnley Modified Type A)
You may not qualify if:
- Significant co-morbidity affecting ability to ambulate
- Flexion contracture greater than 15°
- Tibial subluxation greater than 10 mm on standing AP radiograph
- Greater than 10° of varus or 15° of valgus
- Extension lag greater than 10°
- Lateral or medial collateral ligament instability (\> 10° varus/valgus)
- Previous osteotomy about the knee
- Previous arthroplasty of the knee
- Previous patellectomy
- Leg length discrepancy greater than 10 mm
- Morbid obesity (obesity that results in significant systemic problems)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dalhousie Universitylead
- Stryker Trauma and Extremitiescollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Gross, MD FRCSC PhD
Dalhousie University & Capital District Health Authority
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 28, 2006
First Posted
November 30, 2006
Study Start
July 1, 2001
Primary Completion
June 1, 2005
Study Completion
June 1, 2006
Last Updated
August 12, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-08