NCT07716267

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether robotic-assisted total knee replacement improves recovery compared with conventional total knee replacement in adults with knee osteoarthritis when both groups follow the same structured home-based rehabilitation program. Robotic-assisted and conventional (non-robotic) total knee replacement are both widely used as part of routine clinical care. This study will compare recovery during the first six weeks after surgery. The main questions the study aims to answer are:

  • Be randomly assigned (by chance, similar to flipping a coin) to receive either robotic-assisted or conventional total knee replacement surgery.
  • Complete a structured rehabilitation program that includes education and exercises during the four weeks before surgery and a home-based exercise program for six weeks after surgery.
  • Use a study-provided seated exercise bike, receive support from a physiotherapist through telehealth appointments, secure messaging, and home visits where required, and use a digital application to guide the rehabilitation program and record exercise completion and symptoms.
  • Complete questionnaires about knee pain, knee function, general health, quality of life, and satisfaction with the rehabilitation program.
  • Attend study assessments before surgery, immediately before surgery after completing the pre-surgery program, and about six weeks after surgery. These assessments include simple physical activities such as standing up from a chair, walking, cycling, and measuring leg strength.
  • Allow information about their surgery and hospital stay, such as the duration of surgery and the number of nights spent in hospital, to be recorded for the study. The results of this study will help researchers understand whether robotic-assisted total knee replacement provides additional benefits over conventional total knee replacement when both are combined with the same structured home-based rehabilitation program. The findings may help patients, healthcare professionals, and health services make informed decisions about the use of robotic-assisted knee replacement surgery.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
28mo left

Started Jul 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress4%
Jul 2026Dec 2028

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 6, 2026

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 21, 2026

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2028

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2028

Last Updated

July 21, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

July 6, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 16, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeRobotic-Assisted Total Knee ArthroplastyHome-Based RehabilitationTelerehabilitationRecovery of FunctionInertial Measurement UnitsForce Plates

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Oxford Knee Score (OKS), a composite patient-reported outcome measure of knee-related pain and functional limitation.

    Oxford Knee Score questionnaire (validated 12-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing knee-related pain and functional limitation, combined into a single score ranging from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating better knee-related health status).

    Baseline (4 weeks pre-operative), pre-surgery (after completion of the pre-operative program), and 6 weeks post-surgery.

Secondary Outcomes (23)

  • Adherence to the virtual comprehensive care program

    Continuously throughout the peri-operative program via the digital platform and summarised weekly (pre-operative weeks 1-4 and post-operative weeks 1-6), with a final cumulative adherence value at 6 weeks post-surgery.

  • Program completion of the virtual comprehensive care program

    Assessed at completion of the peri-operative program (6 weeks post-surgery).

  • Tourniquet time

    During the total knee arthroplasty procedure.

  • Hospital length of stay

    From hospital admission until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days.

  • KOOS-JR (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Joint Replacement), a composite patient-reported outcome measure of knee-related symptoms and functional limitation reflecting overall knee-related health status.

    Baseline (4 weeks pre-operative), pre-surgery (after completion of the pre-operative program), and 6 weeks post-surgery.

  • +18 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants undergo robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty and receive a standardized hybrid virtually-assisted comprehensive peri-operative care program comprising a 4-week pre-operative preparation phase and a 6-week post-operative rehabilitation phase, including patient education, home-based exercise, telehealth support, tele-messaging, remote monitoring, and limited in-person physiotherapy services.

Procedure: Robotic-assisted Total Knee ArthroplastyBehavioral: Hybrid Virtually-Assisted Peri-operative Rehabilitation Program

Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants undergo conventional (non-robotic) primary total knee arthroplasty and receive the same standardized hybrid virtually-assisted comprehensive peri-operative care program comprising a 4-week pre-operative preparation phase and a 6-week post-operative rehabilitation phase, including patient education, home-based exercise, telehealth support, tele-messaging, remote monitoring, and limited in-person physiotherapy services.

Procedure: Conventional Total Knee ArthroplastyBehavioral: Hybrid Virtually-Assisted Peri-operative Rehabilitation Program

Interventions

Primary total knee arthroplasty performed using conventional manual instrumentation without robotic assistance by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon. Surgical technique follows standard clinical practice.

Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

A standardized hybrid virtually-assisted comprehensive peri-operative care program delivered before and after surgery. The program comprises a 4-week pre-operative preparation phase followed by a 6-week post-operative rehabilitation phase. It includes patient education, home-based cycling and non-cycling exercises, telehealth consultations, tele-messaging support, remote monitoring, limited in-person physiotherapy services, and symptom-contingent, rule-based exercise progression. The program is delivered identically to both study groups using standardized, protocol-defined procedures.

Also known as: Virtual Comprehensive Care Program, Virtual Peri-operative Comprehensive Care Program, Home-based Rehabilitation Program
Conventional Total Knee ArthroplastyRobotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Primary total knee arthroplasty performed using an approved robotic-assisted surgical system by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon. Robotic assistance is used for pre-operative planning and/or intra-operative execution of bone resections and component positioning in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions for use and the surgeon's standard clinical practice.

Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged 40 years or older.
  • Knee osteoarthritis confirmed by clinical assessment and imaging (e.g., X-ray or MRI) requiring primary total knee replacement surgery.
  • Scheduled to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty with one of the participating surgeons at St John of God Murdoch Hospital.
  • Able to understand the study requirements and provide written informed consent.
  • Physically able to participate in the home-based exercise and stationary cycling rehabilitation program.

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to understand English sufficiently to provide informed consent, complete study questionnaires, or safely follow the rehabilitation program.
  • Previous major surgery on the leg undergoing knee replacement (for example, revision knee replacement or high tibial osteotomy).
  • Osteoarthritis caused by another medical condition (for example, inflammatory arthritis, previous joint infection, gout, fracture involving the joint, congenital abnormality, or haemochromatosis).
  • Chronic pain unrelated to the knee being replaced that could affect study assessments.
  • Unstable heart or lung conditions that make exercise-based rehabilitation unsafe.
  • Body weight greater than 120 kg.
  • Physical conditions that prevent safe participation in the cycling-based rehabilitation program or completion of the study assessments.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Hurworth M, Evans JM, Gibbons R, Mackie KE, Edmondston SJ. Cycle Sprint Test for the Evaluation of Lower Limb Muscle Power After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Arthroplast Today. 2021 Jun 15;9:118-121. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.05.007. eCollection 2021 Jun.

    PMID: 34189216BACKGROUND
  • Hurworth M, Trigg C, Haywood Z, Edmondston SJ. Feasibility and Patient Acceptability of a Cycling-based Telerehabilitation Program Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic Reports. 2026 Mar 18:100967. doi:10.1016/j.jorep.2026.100967

    BACKGROUND
  • Edmondston, S.J, Gibbons, R, Mackie, K.E., Haywood, Z., Hince, D., Hurworth M. Reliability of a Cycle Sprint Test to Measure Lower Limb Muscle Power. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation - International. 2021 8(4):1189. doi:10.26420/physmedrehabilint.2021.1189

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Mark Hurworth, MBChB FRACS FA(Orth)A

    Murdoch Orthopaedic Clinic, St John of God Medical Centre, 10/100 Murdoch Drive, Murdoch 6150 WA, Australia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Novak S. J. Elliott, MBiomedE PhD

    Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley WA 6102, Australia

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Novak S. J. Elliott, MBiomedE PhD

CONTACT

Mark Hurworth, MBChB FRACS FA(Orth)A

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participants and outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation. Blinding of participants will be supported through standardized peri-operative communication and delivery of an identical hybrid virtually-assisted comprehensive peri-operative care program in both groups. Participants will not be informed of their surgical allocation and will be reminded not to disclose details of their procedure during outcome assessments. Data analysts will also remain blinded through the use of masked group labels until completion of the primary analysis. Operating surgeons and clinical care providers cannot be blinded because of the nature of the surgical interventions and routine peri-operative care.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two parallel groups using a computer-based covariate-adaptive minimization algorithm with operating surgeon as the minimization factor. Participants will receive their allocated intervention and will be followed according to the study protocol, with outcomes compared between groups over the six-week postoperative follow-up period.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Mr Mark Hurworth, MBChB FRACS FA(Orth)A, Orthopaedic Surgeon

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2026

First Posted

July 21, 2026

Study Start

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Last Updated

July 21, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data underlying the primary and secondary trial analyses may be shared following publication of the primary trial results. This may include de-identified outcomes data, primary outcome data, safety data, and other trial data generated and/or analysed under this protocol. Baseline or pilot data external to this protocol will not be shared. No identifiable participant information will be shared. Data sharing will occur only where consistent with participant consent, ethics approval, institutional data governance requirements, applicable regulations, and any required data access agreement.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Beginning after publication of the primary trial results, with no specified end date. Requests will be considered after study completion and publication, subject to ethics approval, institutional data governance requirements, participant consent, applicable regulations, and execution of any required data access agreement.
Access Criteria
Access may be granted to researchers for secondary analyses, data verification, meta-research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, studies exploring new research questions, or studies testing whether findings can be repeated or confirmed. Requests must include a scientifically sound proposal or protocol and will be reviewed case-by-case by the study team, trial custodian, sponsor, or relevant data sharing committee. Access is subject to ethics approval where required, institutional governance approval, and execution of a data access agreement specifying permitted uses, data security requirements, and restrictions on re-identification.
More information