Safety and Efficacy of Valsartan vs Atenolol and Hydrochlorothiazide Combination on Blood Flow in Hypertensive Patients
A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Cross-over Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of a 20 Week Treatment of Valsartan 320 mg Versus Atenolol 100 mg in Combination With Hydrochlorothiazide on Microcirculation in Hypertensive Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
30
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
This study evaluated the effect of valsartan on small vessel blood flow in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension in direct comparison to atenolol and hydrochlorothiazide.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 hypertension
Started Dec 2005
Typical duration for phase_3 hypertension
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 6, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2007
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 6, 2011
CompletedJune 6, 2011
May 1, 2011
2 years
November 6, 2006
January 7, 2011
May 5, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected Sites
10 µl of acetylcholine (ACH) at 3 concentrations (10-7, 10-8, 10-9 M) was injected intra-dermally at 3 sites on the forearms. NaCl was injected at 2 sites on the forearms. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. Means for the 3 ACH and the 2 NaCl sites were calculated and compared. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner.
At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Plus L-NMMA Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected Sites
At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)
Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at a Sodium Nitroprusside Injected Site Compared to NaCl Injected Sites
At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)
Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at NaCl Injected Sites
At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)
Arterial Pressure Waveform Augmentation Index at the End of Treatment
At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)
Arterial Pressure Waveform Pulse Wave Velocity at the End of Treatment
At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)
Study Arms (2)
Valsartan followed by atenolol + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)
EXPERIMENTALAfter a 2-week washout period, patients were treated with valsartan for 20 weeks followed by one week in which it was tapered off. Patients received valsartan 160 mg for 4 weeks, followed by valsartan 320 mg for 16 weeks. The valsartan dose was then tapered off to 80 mg for one week. Patients took valsartan film coated tablets orally once a day (od) in the morning. After a second 2-week washout period, patients were treated with atenolol plus HCTZ for 20 weeks. Patients received atenolol 100 mg for 20 weeks. Patients took atenolol tablets orally once a day (od) in the morning. Patients received HCTZ 12.5 mg for 4 weeks starting at the beginning of the 5th week and then received 25 mg for 12 weeks. Patients took HCTZ tablets orally once a day (od) in the morning.
Atenolol + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) followed by valsartan
EXPERIMENTALAfter a 2-week washout period, patients were treated with atenolol plus HCTZ for 20 weeks followed by one week in which atenolol was tapered off and HCTZ was discontinued. Patients received atenolol 100 mg for 20 weeks. Patients took atenolol tablets orally once a day (od) in the morning. Patients received HCTZ 12.5 mg for 4 weeks starting at the beginning of the 5th week and then received 25 mg for 12 weeks. Patients took HCTZ tablets orally once a day (od) in the morning. After a second 2-week washout period, patients were treated with valsartan for 20 weeks. Patients received valsartan 160 mg for 4 weeks, followed by valsartan 320 mg for 16 weeks. Patients took valsartan film coated tablets orally once a day (od) in the morning.
Interventions
100 mg tablets orally once a day (od) in the morning.
12.5 or 25 mg tablets orally once a day (od) in the morning.
80 mg, 160 mg, or 320 mg tablets orally once a day in the morning
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Caucasian; male or female outpatients and age between 40-65 years of age, inclusive.
- At Visit 2 all patients must have a mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msSBP) of ≥ 90 mmHg and \< 110 mmHg.
You may not qualify if:
- If a single reading for arterial hypertension in msSBP \> 180 mmHg or msDBP \> 110 mmHg at any visit after randomization.
- Inability to discontinue all prior antihypertensive medications safely for a period of 2 weeks prior to randomization.
- Known history of hypotensive symptoms or orthostatic hypotension.
- Concomitant use of statins or statin intake during the four weeks prior to Visit 1.
- Known Keith-Wagener grade III or IV hypertensive retinopathy.
- A history of heart failure (NYHA II-IV).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Novartislead
Study Sites (2)
Unknown Facility
Investigative Centers, Germany
Novartis Pharma Ag
Basel, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Novartis Pharma Ag
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 6, 2006
First Posted
November 7, 2006
Study Start
December 1, 2005
Primary Completion
December 1, 2007
Study Completion
December 1, 2007
Last Updated
June 6, 2011
Results First Posted
June 6, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-05