Citrate Anticoagulation vs. Heparin-Coated Dialyzers
Heparin-Coated Polyacrylonitrile Membrane Versus Regional Citrate Anticoagulation: a Prospective Randomised Study of 2 Anticoagulation Strategies in Patients at Risk of Bleeding
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hemodialysis causes contact activation of the coagulation pathway (1). For this reason, unfractionated or low molecular weight heparins are administered in daily practice to prevent thrombosis of the dialyzer and blood circuit, but the dose commonly used causes systemic anticoagulation. This can cause serious complications in patients with high risk of bleeding. Regional and low-dose heparinization, use of prostacycline, regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA), and high-flow-rate hemodialysis without anticoagulation have been shown to reduce bleeding complications. Each of these methods, however, is characterized by its own technical difficulties, limitations, or complications. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membranes (AN69ST) and regional citrate anticoagulation in hemodialysis patients at risk of bleeding
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jan 2005
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2006
CompletedNovember 3, 2006
November 1, 2006
November 2, 2006
November 2, 2006
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
anticoagulation efficacy as evaluated by clotting score of dialyser
anticoagulation efficacy as evaluated by occurrence of major and minor clotting events
anticoagulation efficacy as evaluated by instantaneous blood clearances
Secondary Outcomes (1)
anticoagulation efficay as evaluated by time course of coagulation parameters
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged over 18 years
- chronic kidney disease stage 5 requiring intermittent hemodialysis
- at risk of bleeding
- written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- any haemostatic disorder favouring either bleeding or clotting
- anti-vitamin K or heparin treatment
- heparin induced thrombocytopenia
- haemodynamic instability
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hopsital Leuven
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
Related Publications (2)
Natale P, Palmer SC, Ruospo M, Longmuir H, Dodds B, Prasad R, Batt TJ, Jose MD, Strippoli GF. Anticoagulation for people receiving long-term haemodialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD011858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011858.pub2.
PMID: 38189593DERIVEDEvenepoel P, Dejagere T, Verhamme P, Claes K, Kuypers D, Bammens B, Vanrenterghem Y. Heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membrane versus regional citrate anticoagulation: a prospective randomized study of 2 anticoagulation strategies in patients at risk of bleeding. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 May;49(5):642-9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.02.001.
PMID: 17472846DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pieter Evenepoel, MD, PhD
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2006
First Posted
November 3, 2006
Study Start
January 1, 2005
Study Completion
September 1, 2005
Last Updated
November 3, 2006
Record last verified: 2006-11