Disc Prosthesis Versus Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation
Effect of Lumbar Disc Prosthesis Versus Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Program in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and Degenerative Disc. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Multicentre Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
179
1 country
5
Brief Summary
Surgical methods offered to patients with chronic low back pain are controversial. In addition, new and expensive treatment methods like total disc replacemet (TDR) are a challenge for the health care services. At present, ongoing randomized studies in both Europe and USA are comparing TDR to fusion. However, to our knowledge, no randomized trials have compared TDR to non-surgical treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of a comprehensive and structured non-surgical treatment with TDR surgery in patients with chronic low back pain and localized degenerative disc changes. Main hypothesis: There is no difference in treatment effect between surgery with lumbar total disc prosthesis and a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program measured by Oswestry Disability Index after 1 and 2 years. Secondary hypothesis: There is no difference in cost - effectiveness between surgery with lumbar disc prosthesis and a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program after 1 and 2 years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2004
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2007
CompletedOctober 12, 2012
October 1, 2012
3.4 years
October 31, 2006
October 11, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Oswestry Disability Index
Cost-effectiveness (full economic analysis)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Side effects
Time out of work
Fear - avoidance beliefs
Self - efficacy for pain
Hopkins symptoms check list
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Low back pain as the main symptom for at least one year.
- Structured physiotherapy or chiropractic treatment for at least 6 months without (significant) effect.
- Oswestry Disability Index score of 30% points or more
- Degenerative changes in the intervertebral disc in one or both of the two lowest levels of the lumbar spine (L4/L5 and/or L5/S1). (Degenerative changes are classified based on MR findings according to the following criteria: At least 40% reduction of disc height, Modic changes type I and/or II, "High intensity zone" in the disc, Morphological changes classified as changes in signal intensity in the disc. To classify the disc as degenerative the first criteria alone or at least two of the other criteria must be present. The MR series are evaluated by two independent observers.)
You may not qualify if:
- Generalized chronic pain syndrome (widespread myofascial pain)
- Degeneration established in more than two levels. To be classified as a normal disc, the disc height must not be reduced more than 40% and all other criteria of degenerative disc disease aforementioned must be absent. The classification of a normal disc is performed by two independent observers. If disagreement, the pictures will be classified by a third observer and the outcome decided by simple majority.
- Symptoms of spinal stenosis
- Disc protrusion or recess stenosis with nerve root affection
- Spondylolysis
- Isthmic spondylolisthesis
- Arthritis
- Former fracture of L1 - S1
- Ongoing psychiatric or somatic disease that excludes either one or both treatment alternatives
- Does not understand Norwegian language, spoken or in writing
- Drug abuse
- Osteoporosis
- Congenital or acquired deformity
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ullevaal University Hospitallead
- The Royal Norwegian Ministry of Healthcollaborator
- St. Olavs Hospitalcollaborator
- University of Tromsocollaborator
- Haukeland University Hospital, Dept of neck and back diseasescollaborator
- Haukeland University Hospitalcollaborator
- Helse Stavanger HFcollaborator
- Falu Lasarett Röntgencollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, Bergen, 5021, Norway
Ullevål University Hospital, Orthopedic Centre
Oslo, Oslo County, 0407, Norway
Stavanger University Hospital
Stavanger, Stavanger, 4068, Norway
University Hospital of Nothern-Norway
Tromsø, Tromsø, 9038, Norway
St.Olavs Hospital, NSSL
Trondheim, Trondheim, 7005, Norway
Related Publications (5)
Hellum C, Johnsen LG, Storheim K, Nygaard OP, Brox JI, Rossvoll I, Ro M, Sandvik L, Grundnes O; Norwegian Spine Study Group. Surgery with disc prosthesis versus rehabilitation in patients with low back pain and degenerative disc: two year follow-up of randomised study. BMJ. 2011 May 19;342:d2786. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2786.
PMID: 21596740RESULTHellum C, Berg L, Gjertsen O, Johnsen LG, Neckelmann G, Storheim K, Keller A, Grundnes O, Espeland A; Norwegian Spine Study Group. Adjacent level degeneration and facet arthropathy after disc prosthesis surgery or rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc: second report of a randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Dec 1;37(25):2063-73. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318263cc46.
PMID: 22706091RESULTHellum C, Johnsen LG, Gjertsen O, Berg L, Neckelmann G, Grundnes O, Rossvoll I, Skouen JS, Brox JI, Storheim K; Norwegian Spine Study Group. Predictors of outcome after surgery with disc prosthesis and rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc: 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2012 Apr;21(4):681-90. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2145-3. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
PMID: 22246644RESULTStorheim K, Berg L, Hellum C, Gjertsen O, Neckelmann G, Espeland A, Keller A; Norwegian Spine Study Group. Fat in the lumbar multifidus muscles - predictive value and change following disc prosthesis surgery and multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc: 2-year follow-up of a randomized trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1505-5.
PMID: 28376754DERIVEDJohnsen LG, Brinckmann P, Hellum C, Rossvoll I, Leivseth G. Segmental mobility, disc height and patient-reported outcomes after surgery for degenerative disc disease: a prospective randomised trial comparing disc replacement and multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Bone Joint J. 2013 Jan;95-B(1):81-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B1.29829.
PMID: 23307678DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Kjersti Storheim, PT, PhD
Orthopedic Centre, Ullevål University Hospital / NAR
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2006
First Posted
November 1, 2006
Study Start
April 1, 2004
Primary Completion
September 1, 2007
Study Completion
September 1, 2007
Last Updated
October 12, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-10