Trial Between a Computer-Guided Insulin Infusion Protocol Versus a Standard Insulin Infusion Algorithm in Medical ICU
2 other identifiers
interventional
160
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The study is a multicenter, prospective, open-label randomized study to compare the safety and efficacy of continuous insulin infusion (CII) via a computer-guided(Glucommander) and a standard paper form protocol among the patients hospitalized in a medical intensive care unit (ICU). .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2006
Typical duration for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 30, 2013
CompletedOctober 30, 2018
October 1, 2018
2.3 years
October 31, 2006
December 8, 2008
October 2, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Blood Glucose (BG) in mg/dl Among Glucommander Group Compared to Standard Insulin Infusion
Daily mean blood glucose concentrations during insulin infusion with the Glucommander and a standard paper form insulin infusion algorithm are measured every day up until 10 days and a mean values of these levels are calculated. The Mean blood glucose concentrations are measured once the target blood glucose levels are achieved after admission
First 10 days of ICU stay
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of Patients With Severe Hypoglycemia Episodes Among the Glucommander Group Compared to Standard Algorithm
First 10 days of ICU stay
Mean Length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in Days Stay Among Glucommander Group Compared to Standard Insulin Infusion Group
During ICU hospitalization, up to 30 days
Mean Hospital Length of Stay in Days Among the Glucommander Group Compared to Standard Insulin Infusion
During the complete length of hospitalization, up to 60 days
Study Arms (2)
Computer assisted IV insulin infusion
EXPERIMENTALSubjects in this group will receive continuous intravenous (IV) Insulin Infusion using glucommander computer guided system. All patients in the study will receive Glulisine(Apidra R ) a rapid acting insulin approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Standard insulin infusion algorithm
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects in this group will receive Insulin using Standard insulin infusion algorithm. All patients in the study will receive Glulisine(Apidra R ) a rapid acting insulin approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Interventions
Glucommander is a Computer-guided Intravenous (IV) insulin infusion protocol used for glycemic control in inpatients. This algorithm directs the administration of IV insulin in response to Blood Glucose (BG) measurement at the patient's bedside. In this study, the Glucommander program was loaded into a PalmOne (Zire 31, Tungsten E2 by Palm Inc.) handheld personal digital assistant (PDA) device. During the infusion, the nurse entered BG levels into the system and the computer recommended the insulin infusion rate and a variable time to check the next glucose testing. An alarm prompted the scheduled glucose check. The insulin infusion followed the formula: Insulin/Hour = Multiplier × (BG- 60).
Standard insulin infusion Algorithm is a standard paper form insulin infusion algorithm. The algorithm is divided into four columns based on empirically determined insulin sensitivity. The first column was for the most insulin-sensitive patients, and the fourth column was for the most insulin resistant patients. The majority of patients are started in the algorithm 1 column. Insulin resistant patients, such as those receiving glucocorticoids or receiving \>80 units of insulin per day as outpatients, started in the algorithm 2 column. The insulin infusion rate was determined by the patient's BG level and was measured hourly until the patient was stable and within the target range. If BG targets were not achieved and the BG had not decreased by at least 60 mg/dL in the preceding hour, the patient was moved to the next column.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males or females between the ages of 18 and 70 years admitted to a medical ICU
- A known history of diabetes mellitus or with new hyperglycemia untreated or treated by diet, insulin therapy or with any combination of antidiabetic agents (sulfonylureas, metformin, thiazolidinediones).
- Blood glucose greater than 120 mg/dl on ≥ 2 occasions for known, treated diabetics or greater than 140 mg/dl on ≥ 2 occasions for those with new hyperglycemia.
- Subjects must have an admission blood glucose \< 400 mg/dL, without laboratory evidence of diabetic ketoacidosis (serum bicarbonate \< 18 milliequivalents/L or positive serum or urinary ketones).
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with acute hyperglycemic crises such as diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state \[38\].
- Patients with known HIV, severely impaired renal function (serum creatinine ≥3.0 mg/dl).
- Patients with mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study.
- Female subjects who are pregnant or breast feeding at time of enrollment into the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Emory Universitylead
- Sanoficollaborator
- Grady Health Systemcollaborator
- Piedmont Healthcarecollaborator
- University of Tennesseecollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Grady Memorial Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303, United States
Piedmont Hopsital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309, United States
University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis
Memphis, Tennessee, 38103, United States
University of Washington, Seattle
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
Related Publications (1)
Newton CA, Smiley D, Bode BW, Kitabchi AE, Davidson PC, Jacobs S, Steed RD, Stentz F, Peng L, Mulligan P, Freire AX, Temponi A, Umpierrez GE. A comparison study of continuous insulin infusion protocols in the medical intensive care unit: computer-guided vs. standard column-based algorithms. J Hosp Med. 2010 Oct;5(8):432-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.816.
PMID: 20945468RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study was conducted in the medical ICU and excluded postsurgical patients and subjects expected to undergo a major surgical procedure, patients with severe renal insufficiency and with a history of hyperglycemic crises.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Guillermo Umpierrez, MD
- Organization
- Emory University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Guillermo E Umpierrez, MD
Emory University SOM/Grady Health System
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bruce Bode, MD
Piedmont Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Abbas E Kitabchi, PhD,MD
University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Irl B Hirsch, MD
University of Washington
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2006
First Posted
November 1, 2006
Study Start
June 1, 2006
Primary Completion
September 1, 2008
Study Completion
September 1, 2008
Last Updated
October 30, 2018
Results First Posted
September 30, 2013
Record last verified: 2018-10