Study Stopped
DSMB stopped study because placebo arm had more adverse events
Escitalopram in Treating Depression in Patients With Advanced Lung or Gastrointestinal Cancer
Symptom Management Trial in Cancer Survivors
3 other identifiers
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Escitalopram may help improve depression and quality of life in patients with advanced lung or gastrointestinal cancer. It is not yet known whether escitalopram is more effective than a placebo in treating depression in patients with advanced lung or gastrointestinal cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying the side effects of escitalopram and to see how well it works compared to a placebo in treating depression in patients with advanced lung or gastrointestinal cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 colorectal-cancer
Started Mar 2006
Typical duration for phase_3 colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 12, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 13, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 3, 2012
CompletedDecember 3, 2012
November 1, 2012
5.1 years
October 12, 2006
July 12, 2012
November 2, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Depression Response Rate of Escitalopram Oxalate 10 mg Once Daily Compared to Placebo Once Daily for Major Depressive Disorder
Response rate was defined as a 50% reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) scores over 4 weeks. The HAM-D can have total scores that range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater depression. Scores over 14 are considered to be in the depressed range.
4 weeks
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Scores
The change in HAM-D scores was calculated by subtracting the score at 4 weeks from the score at baseline. The HAM-D can have total scores that range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater depression. Scores over 14 are considered to be in the depressed range.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Side Effect Burden
4 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Placebo-Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo once daily for the first 4 weeks and placebo once daily for the second 4 weeks
Placebo-Escitalopram
OTHERParticipants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo once daily for the first 4 weeks and escitalopram oxalate 10 mg once daily for the second 4 weeks
Escitalopram-Placebo
OTHERParticipants in this arm were randomzied to receive escitalopram 10 mg once daily for the first 4 weeks and placebo once daily for the second 4 weeks
Interventions
escitalopram oxalate 10 mg once daily for 4 weeks
one placebo pill identical in appearance to the escitalpram pill once daily
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Massachusetts General Hospitallead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
After an interim analaysis, the DSMB decided to terminate the trial early because of the rate of adverse events (HAM-D scores increasing by at least 25%) and deaths were higher in participants receiving placebo.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- William F Pirl, MD
- Organization
- Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
William F. Pirl, MD
Massachusetts General Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 12, 2006
First Posted
October 13, 2006
Study Start
March 1, 2006
Primary Completion
April 1, 2011
Study Completion
April 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 3, 2012
Results First Posted
December 3, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-11