Study Stopped
Resources unavailable to continue study follow-up.
Prospective Evaluation of Elastic Restraint to LESSen the Effects of Heart Failure (PEERLESS-HF) Trial
PEERLESS-HF
1 other identifier
interventional
220
2 countries
35
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if patients in the HeartNet Ventricular Support System with optimal medical and device therapy arm (Treatment group) show statistically significant improvement compared to patients in the optimal medical and device therapy alone arm (Control group) after 6 months of follow-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 heart-failure
Started Oct 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_2 heart-failure
35 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 2, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 13, 2012
CompletedJuly 13, 2012
June 1, 2012
4.6 years
September 28, 2006
May 13, 2011
June 7, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Responder Analysis - Peak Oxygen Uptake (Peak VO2)
A participant was considered a "responder" if cardiopulmonary exercise testing demonstrated an improvement in peak VO2 of at least 1.0 ml/kg/min at 6 months as compared to baseline.
Baseline to 6 months
Responder Analysis - Six (6) Minute Walk (6MW) Distance
A participant was considered a "responder" if 6MW distance at 6 months was at least 45 meters more than at baseline.
Baseline to 6 months
Responder Analysis - Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Quality of Life Overall Score
A participant was considered a "responder" if the MLHF overall score had improved by at least 7 points at 6 months as compared to baseline. THE MLHF questionnaire evaluates the impact of heart failure (HF) on a subject's physical, emotional, social and mental aspects of quality of life. Each of 21 questions about how much HF impacts daily activities is scored from 0-no impact to 5-very much (overall score can range from 0 to 105). Improvement is indicated by a decrease in score.
baseline to 6 months
Number of Participant Deaths
Total number of participants who died within 12 months of enrollment into the trial.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class
baseline to 6 months
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
baseline to 6 months
Change in Left Ventricular Mass
baseline to 6 months
Responder Analysis - Peak Oxygen Uptake (Peak VO2)
baseline to 12 months
Responder Analysis - Six (6) Minute Walk (6MW) Distance
baseline to 12 Months
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Treatment
EXPERIMENTALHeartNet and Optimal Medical/Device Therapy (e.g., medications and cardiac resynchronisation therapy)
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATOROptimal Medical/Device Therapy alone (e.g., medications and/or cardiac resynchronisation therapy) (Note: For the purpose of the PEERLESS-HF study, optimal medical therapy is defined as the use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and Beta blockers in the highest tolerable doses for three months prior to study enrollment, and Optimal device therapy is defined as cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) for at least three months prior to study enrollment, when indicated.)
Interventions
The HeartNet Implant is placed on the epicardial surface of the heart surrounding both the left and right ventricles.
Optimal Medical/Device Therapy - For the purpose of the PEERLESS-HF study, optimal medical therapy is defined as the use of ACE inhibitors and Beta blockers in the highest tolerable doses for three months prior to study enrollment, and Optimal device therapy is defined as CRT or CRT-D for at least three months prior to study enrollment, when indicated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Symptomatic heart failure at enrollment (American College of Cardiology \[ACC\]/American Heart Association \[AHA\] Stage C) due to ischemic or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy
- On stable, evidence-based medical and device therapy for heart failure for 3 months prior to randomization \<a\> Pharmacological Therapy (as appropriate) \<i\> angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) for patients with ACE inhibitor intolerance or nitrate/hydralazine at the investigators discretion \<ii\> beta blockers \<iii\> diuretics, aldosterone inhibitors \<b\> Ejection fraction \< or = to 35% while maintained on optimal medical therapy \<c\> Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT), Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D) \<i\> If implanted with a CRT or CRT-D, it must be implanted \> or = to 3 months before randomization \<ii\> If currently eligible or anticipated eligibility with a CRT or CRT-D within 6 months, the patient should not be enrolled in the study
- Specific Qualifying Characteristics
- Six (6) minute walk of 150 - 450m
- Peak VO2 for males: 10.0-20.0 ml/kg/min; Peak VO2 for females: 9.0-18.0 ml/kg/min
- Left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) \<85mm and index \<40mm/m2 (LVEDD/BSA)
- Heart failure duration \> or = to 6 months
You may not qualify if:
- Patient History
- Heart failure due to a reversible condition
- Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM)
- Left ventricular assist device (LVAD), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or intravenous inotropes are required or the patient has end stage heart failure despite maintenance on best medical therapy
- Myxoma
- Active infection, sepsis, endocarditis, myocarditis or pericarditis
- Myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, cardiac or other major surgery, or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker implantation in the 3 months prior to entry
- Positive pregnancy test for pre-menopausal female
- Less than 18 years or \> or = to 75 years old
- Hemoglobin level less than 10 gm/dL or creatinine \>2.5 mg/dL
- Uncontrolled medical conditions that increase surgical risk
- Co-morbid condition that in the investigator's opinion reduces life expectancy to less than 2 years
- Surgical or Anatomical Considerations
- Heart measurement too large or small for Implant sizes
- Restrictive cardiomyopathy
- +13 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (35)
University of Alabama Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
USC Keck School of Medicine
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
University of California, San Francisco, Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Christiana Care Health System
Newark, Delaware, 19718, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Midwest Heart Foundation
Lombard, Illinois, 60148, United States
St. Vincent Hospital and Health Services
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260, United States
Genesis Medical Center
Davenport, Iowa, 52803, United States
University of Maryland, Division of Cardiology
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Caritas St. Elizabeth's Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02135, United States
Wayne State University/ Oakwood Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
Minneapolis VA Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55417, United States
St. Paul Heart Clinic
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102, United States
Mid America Heart Institute
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111, United States
BryanLGH Heart Improvement Program
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68506, United States
Morristown Memorial Hospital
Morristown, New Jersey, 07962, United States
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467, United States
The Lindner Clinical Trial Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
The Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Oklahoma Heart Hospital
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120, United States
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212, United States
The Stern Cardiovascular Center
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138, United States
Tennessee Cardiovascular Research Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205, United States
Intermountain Medical Center
Murray, Utah, 84107, United States
Inova Heart & Vascular Institute/ Fairfax Hospital
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042, United States
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
St. Boniface General Hospital
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
McGill University Hospital Centre
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Abraham WT, Anand I, Aranda JM Jr, Boehmer J, Costanzo MR, DeMarco T, Holcomb R, Ivanhoe R, Kolber M, Rayburn B. Randomized controlled trial of ventricular elastic support therapy in the treatment of symptomatic heart failure: rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2012 Nov;164(5):638-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.07.015. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
PMID: 23137493DERIVEDKeteyian SJ, Brawner CA, Ehrman JK, Ivanhoe R, Boehmer JP, Abraham WT; PEERLESS-HF Trial Investigators. Reproducibility of peak oxygen uptake and other cardiopulmonary exercise parameters: implications for clinical trials and clinical practice. Chest. 2010 Oct;138(4):950-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2624. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
PMID: 20522572DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
An interim analysis indicated trial futility based on a primary endpoint. Enrollment was suspended in July, 2009. Study was terminated as of April, 2011 due to insufficient resources.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michael Kolber, General Manager, VP of Regulatory Affairs
- Organization
- Paracor Medical, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
William T. Abraham, MD
Chief, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2006
First Posted
October 2, 2006
Study Start
October 1, 2006
Primary Completion
May 1, 2011
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
July 13, 2012
Results First Posted
July 13, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-06